Abstract

Dear Editor,
I read with concern the recent article by Thibault et al. 1 Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency has conclusively been demonstrated to be a failed concept. The meta-analysis cited by the authors 2 is an early publication whose findings have been conclusively refuted following more rigorous examination.3–5 Additionally, ‘Liberation Procedures’ aiming to intervene directly with potential venous lesions have consistently been proven to have no efficacy. 6
Appraisal of more contemporary literature also fails to support the contention that Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection is important in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS).7–9 Likewise, treatment of C. pneumoniae infection in MS patients has been demonstrated to have no effect on disease progression. 10
Hence, the authors’ original hypothesis, premised on out-of-date information, is fatally flawed. Additionally, alteration of blood flow is a soft surrogate endpoint that does not warrant attention when clinically relevant endpoints such as relapse rates and disease progression have been thoroughly investigated.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
