This article tries to answer two questions. The first is whether capitalist class formation is now taking place at a transnational level; the second is what regime of corporate governance was becoming dominant in the last quarter of the 20th century. The answers given are based on a comparison of the networks of interlocking directorates among the 176 largest corporations in the world economy as of 1976 and 1996. The analysis suggests that from the 1970s to the 1990s an Atlantic business system developed. However, Japanese firms were not integrated into this network while the European Union was indeed creating a European business community. The research lends support to the hypothesis that the network has become less a device for domination and control and more a device for building hegemony. This also suggests that corporate governance is increasingly based on exit strategies rather than on voice as has been common in continental European contexts.
Amin, S. (2000) `The Political Economy of the Twentieth Century', Monthly Review52(2): 1-17.
2.
Bairoch, P. (2000) `The Constituent Economic Principles of Globalization in Historical Perspective', International Sociology15(2): 197-214.
3.
Barnet, R. J. and Muller, R. E. (1974) Global Reach: The Power of the Multinational Corporation. New York: Simon and Schuster.
4.
Burbach, R. and Robinson, W. I. (1999) `The Fin De Siecle Debate: Globalization as Epochal Shift', Science and Society63(1): 10-39.
5.
Davis, G. F. and Mizruchi, M. S. (1999) `The Money Center Cannot Hold: Commercial Banks in the US System of Corporate Governance', Administrative Science Quarterly44(2): 215-239.
6.
Doremus, P. N. , Keller, W. W. et al. (1998) The Myth of the Global Corporation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Fennema, M. (1982) International Networks of Banks and Industry. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
8.
Fennema, M. and Schijf, H. (1978) `Analysing Interlocking Directorates: Theory and Methods', Social Networks1: 298-332.
9.
Fennema, M. and Schijf, H. (1985) `The Transnational Network', in F. N. Stokman, R. Ziegler and J. Scott (eds) Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Countries. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
Fennema, M. and van der Pijl, K. (1987) `International Bank Capital and the New Liberalism', in S. Mizruchi and M. Schwartz (eds) Corporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Gerlach, M. L. (1992) Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Gill, S. (1990) American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) `The Strength of Weak Ties', American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360-1380.
14.
Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1996) Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
Kennedy, M. C. (1988) `The New Global Network of Corporate Power and the Decline of National Self-Determination', Contemporary Crises12: 245-276.
16.
Mills, C. W. (1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Mizruchi, M. S. (1996) `What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates', Annual Review of Sociology22: 271-299.
18.
Nooteboom, B. (1999) `Voice- and Exit-Based Forms of Corporate Control: Anglo-American, European, and Japanese', Journal of Economic Issues33(4): 845-861.
19.
Palloix, C. (1975) L'Internationalisation du capital. Elements critiques. Paris: Maspéro.
20.
Rhodes, M. and van Apeldoorn, B. (1998) `Capital Unbound? The Transformation of European Corporate Governance', Journal of European Public Policy5(3): 406-427.
21.
Scott, J. (1997) Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Sklair, L. (2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
Stokman, F. N. and Wasseur, F. W. (1985) `National Networks in 1976: A Structural Comparison', in F. N. Stokman, R. Ziegler and J. Scott (eds) Networks of Corporate Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
Stokman, F. N. , Ziegler, R. and Scott, J., eds (1985) Networks of Corporate Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
Therborn, G. (2000) `Globalization', International Sociology15(2): 151-179.
26.
Tomasic, R. and Bottomley, S. (1991) The Fiduciary Duties of Directors in Listed Public Companies. Canberra: Centre for National Corporate Law Research.
27.
Useem, M. (1984) The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the US and UK. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Van Apeldoorn, B. (2000) `Transnational Class Agency and European Governance: The Case of the European Round Table of Industrialists', New Political Economy5(2): 167-181.
29.
Van Apeldoorn, B. (2002) Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle over European Integration. London: Routledge.
30.
Van der Pijl, K. (1984) The Making of an Atlantic Ruling Class. London: Verso.
31.
Van der Pijl, K. (1998) Transnational Classes and International Relations. London: Routledge.
32.
Wallerstein, I. (1974) The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York and London: Academic Press.
33.
Wallerstein, I. (1980) The Modern World-System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600-1750. New York and London: Academic Press.
34.
Westney, D. E. (1996) `The Japanese Business System: Key Features and Prospects for Change', Journal of Asian Business12(1): 21-50.
35.
Windolf, P. (2001) `Markets and Networks: Corporate Networks in Six Countries', Corporate Governance in a Globalizing World, NIAS, 23-5 April.
36.
Wittek, R. and Wielers, R. (1998) `Gossip in Organizations', Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory4(2): 189-204.
