Evaluating sustainability in local public projects: Performance indicators,transparency,and the risk of greenwashing

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to analyze how sustainability is measured and verified in local territorial projects funded by European, national, and regional resources. Although the supranational and national levels promote the integration of sustainability principles, their actual verifiability at the local level often relies on indicators that are poorly structured or entirely absent. Methodology: The study adopts a qualitative approach based on a multiple case study design, conducted exclusively through desk analysis of the 2021,2027 European programming period. The Amministrazione Trasparente section or OpenBilanci are both sources of data, as well as project-level data extracted from OpenCoesione and strategic planning documents released by individual municipalities. Three municipalities from the Lazio Region (C1, C2, and C3) are included in the sample, which is categorized by demographic size according to ISTAT data and picked based on transparency, data availability, and project traceability. The analysis develops in three stages: classification of projects according to the three dimensions of sustainability; mapping and evaluation of performance indicators (KPIs) reported in public documentation; and identification of potential greenwashing risks through the linkage between identified KPIs (or their absence) and funded projects. Results: The findings highlight significant difficulties in verifying sustainability within funded projects and the risk that sustainability remains merely formal, thereby increasing exposure to greenwashing. Relevance and Implications for Research and Practice: The originality of the study lies in treating the absence of sustainability measurability indicators not as a methodological shortcoming but as an empirical result in itself, capable of linking the lack of KPIs with greenwashing risk. The framework that is developed allows for a joint assessment of KPI presence and greenwashing risk, making it a comparative tool to assess the reliability of sustainability claims at the local level.

Keywords

sustainability assurance public accountability local governments audit practices greenwashing risk European Union funds

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akomea-Frimpong

Agar

Alidu

A-R

, et al. (2024) A literature review of environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators in the construction industry [preprint]. Preprints 1: 0203. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0203.v1

Anh

(2023) Sustainable performance measurement in public sectors: a systematic literature review. VNU University of Economics and Business 3(6): 58. https://doi.org/10.57110/vnujeb.v3i6.225

Annan-Aggrey

Arku

(2023) ‘New wine in old wineskins?’—Understanding the framing of SDGs in the local government context in Ghana. Progress in Development Studies 23(1): 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934221112225

Appannan

Mohd Said

Ong

, et al. (2022) Promoting sustainable development through strategies, environmental management accounting and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 32(4): 1914–1930. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3828

Argentiero

Chiarini

Marzano

(2020). Does Tax Evasion Affect Economic Crime? Fiscal Studies 41(2): 441–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12214

Bell

Morse

(2008) Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edition. Earthscan.

Bowen

(2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9(2): 27. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Bradley

Heald

Hodges

(2022) Causes, consequences and possible resolution of the local authority audit crisis in England. Public Money & Management 43(4): 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2129550

Bryan

(2021). Sustainability reporting at EU level: Leading by Example? Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 34(3): 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-05-2021-0083

10.

Bulkeley

Betsill

(2005) Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics 14(1): 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178

11.

Correia

(2019) Sustainability: an overview of the triple bottom line and sustainability implementation. International Journal of Strategic Engineering (IJoSE) 2(1): 10–29. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJoSE.2019010103

12.

de Freitas Netto

Sobral

MFF

Ribeiro

ARB

, et al. (2020) Concepts and forms of greenwashing: a systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe 32(19): 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3

13.

Dzomira

(2020) Corporate governance and performance of audit committee and internal audit functions in an emerging economy’s public sector. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance 13(1): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686220923789

14.

European Commission (2019) The European Green Deal (COM(2019) 640 Final). Publications Office of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640

15.

European Communities (1987) Single european act. Official Journal of the European Communities - Legislation 169: 1–29. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:11986U

16.

Eurostat . (2017). Sustainable Development in the European Union, Monitoring Report on Progress Towards the Sdgs in an EU Context (Report No. KS-04-17-780). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2785/237722. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-flagship-publications/-/ks-04-17-780

17.

Hooghe

Marks

(2001) Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

18.

Javed

Kong

Iqbal

, et al. (2022) A systematic review of barriers in adoption of environmental management accounting in Chinese SMEs for sustainable performance [retracted]. Frontiers in Public Health 10: 832711. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.832711

19.

Kaur

Lodhia

(2019) Sustainability accounting, accountability and reporting in the public sector: an overview and suggestions for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research 27(4): 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2019-510

20.

Kolcava

(2023) Greenwashing and public demand for government regulation. Journal of Public Policy 43(1): 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X22000203

21.

Krantz

Gustafsson

(2021) Localizing the sustainable development goals through an integrated approach in municipalities: early experiences from a Swedish forerunner. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 64(14): 2571–2589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1892829

22.

Liu

Zhong

(2025) Challenging to change? Examining the link between public participation and greenwashing based on organizational inertia. Sustainability 17(3): 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031229

23.

Meadows

Randers

, et al. (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books.

24.

Membrillo-Hernández

Lara-Prieto

Caratozzolo

(2021) Sustainability: a public policy, a concept, or a competence? Efforts on the implementation of sustainability as a transversal competence throughout higher education programs. Sustainability 13(6): 3156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063156

25.

Nemes

Scanlan

Smith

, et al. (2022) An integrated framework to assess greenwashing. Sustainability 14(8): 4431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084431

26.

OECD (2008) Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en

27.

OpenCoesione (2021) OpenCoesione: Monitoraggio dei progetti finanziati dalle politiche di coesione. https://opencoesione.gov.it.

28.

Ramos

Domingues

Caeiro

, et al. (2021) Co-creating a sustainability performance assessment tool for public sector organisations. Journal of Cleaner Production 320: 128738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128738

29.

Ríos

A-M

Guillamón

M-D

Benito

(2024) The influence of local government transparency on the implementation of the sustainable development goals in municipalities. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management 36(4): 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-12-2023-0229

30.

Sachs

Schmidt-Traub

Kroll

, et al. (2019) Sustainable development report 2019. Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN). https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/reports/sustainable-development-report-2019

31.

Tang

Yang

Chen

, et al. (2020) Greenwashing of local government: the human-caused risks in the process of environmental information disclosure in China. Sustainability 12(16): 6329. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166329

32.

Ulmer

Divine

Wydra

(2023) Lost in translation? Tanzanian students’ views on sustainability and language, and the implications for the pledge to leave no one behind. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 24(8): 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2022-0163

33.

United Nations (1992) Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21

34.

Vicente

Benito

Bastida

(2013) Transparency and political budget cycles at municipal level. Swiss Political Science Review 19(2): 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12036

35.

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.

36.

Yin

(2018) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th edition. Sage Publications.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.22 MB