Background: Goal-directed training is an activity-based approach to therapy. Meaningful, client-selected goals are used to provide opportunities for problem solving and to indirectly drive the movements required to successfully meet the task demands. This is in contrast to interventions that focus on changing body functions. Here, the principles of goal-directed training will be studied through two case studies with the aim of linking theories of treatment to clinical practice.
Principles illustrated: The approach is based on the dynamic systems motor control theory and occupation-based therapy models, which suggest that movement patterns emerge from the interaction between the person's abilities, environment and the goal. Motor learning principles are applied to structure and schedule practice.
Theory in practice: Four components provide the basis for goal-directed training: (1) selection of a meaningful goal; (2) analysis of baseline performance; (3) intervention/ practice regime; and (4) evaluation of outcome. Two individuals with acquired brain injury practised self-care tasks: eating and tying hair into a ponytail. Intensive training was undertaken over four weeks and the intervention outcome measured using the Goal Attainment Scale.
Conclusions: The positive achievements in the self-care tasks illustrated that theories of motor control and motor learning can be applied to goal-directed training. The examples demonstrated that the approach could be applied to individuals with a range of abilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Lesensky S , Kaplan L . Occupational therapy and motor learning: putting theory into practice . OT Practice2000; 5: 13-16 .
2.
Mathiowetz V , Haugen JB . Motor behavior research: Implications for therapeutic approaches to central nervous system dysfunction . Am J Occup Ther1994; 48: 733-745 .
3.
Schmidt RA , Lee TD . Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics , 1999.
4.
Kielhofner G . A model of human occupation: theory and application, third edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins , 2002.
5.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists . Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective, revised edition. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists , 2002.
6.
Law M , Cooper BA , Strong S , Stewart D , Rigby P , Letts L . The person-environment-occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance . Can J Occup Ther1996; 63: 9-23 .
7.
Fisher AG . Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework: Eleanor Clarke Slagel Lecture . Am J Occup Ther1998; 52: 509-521 .
8.
McLellan DL . Introduction to rehabilitation. In Wilson BA , McLellan DL eds. Rehabilitation studies handbook. Cambridge University Press , 1997: 1-20.
9.
Fisher AG. A model for planning and implementing top-down, client centred and occupation based occupational therapy intervention. Unpublished manuscript 2002.
10.
Kimmerie M , Mainwaring L , Borenstein M . The functional repertoire of the hand and its application to assessment . Am J Occup Ther2003; 57: 489-498 .
11.
Trombly C . Carr and Shepherd approach: Motor relearning programme for stroke patients. In Trombly C ed. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. Williams and Wilkins , 1989: 155-160.
12.
Eliasson AC . Improving the use of hands in daily activities: aspects of treatment of children with cerebral palsy . Phys Occup Ther Pediatr2005; 25: 37-60 .
13.
Horak FB . Assumptions underlying motor control for neurologic rehabilitation. In Lister MJ ed. II STEP: Contemporary management of motor control problems. Oklahoma Foundation for Physical Therapy , 1990: 11-28.
14.
Missiuna C , Mandich AD , Polatajko H , Malloy-Miller T . Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP): Part 1 - theoretical foundation . Phys Occup Ther Pediatr2001; 20: 69-81 .
15.
Fitts PM , Posner MI . Human performance. Brooks/ Cole Publishing , 1967.
16.
Eliasson AC . Sensorimotor integration of normal and impaired development of precision movement of the hand. In Henderson A , Pehoski C eds. Hand function in the child: foundations for remediation. Mosby , 1995: 40-54.
17.
Kiresuk TJ , Sherman RE . Goal Attainment Scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs . Community Ment Health J1968; 4: 443-453 .
18.
King GA , McDougall J , Palisano R , Gritzan J , Tucker MA . Goal attainment scaling: its use in evaluating pediatric therapy programs . Phys Occup Ther Pediatr1999; 19: 31-52 .
19.
Gentile AM . Implicit and explicit processes during acquisition of functional skills . Scand J Occup Ther1998; 5: 7-16 .
20.
Landin D . The role of verbal cues in skill learning . Quest1994; 46: 299-313 .
Kernodle MW , Carlton LG . Information feedback and the learning of multiple degree-of-freedom activities . J Mot Behav1992; 24: 187-196 .
23.
Rose DJ . A multi-level approach to the study of motor control and learning. Allyn and Bacon , 1997.
24.
Wu C-y , Wong M-y , Wong MK . Effects of task goal and personal preference on seated reaching kinematics after stroke . Stroke2001; 32: 70-76 .
25.
Ferguson JM , Trombly C . The effect of added purpose and meaningful occupation on motor learning . Am J Occup Ther1997; 51: 508-515 .
26.
Kottke FK , Halpern D , Easron JKM , Ozel AT , Burrill CA . The training of coordination . Arch Phys Med Rehabil1972; 59: 567-572 .
27.
Kwakkel G , van Peppen R , Wagenaar RC et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta analysis . Stroke2004; 35: 2529-2539 .
28.
Gentile AM . Skill acquisition: Action, movement and neuromotor processes. In Carr JH , Shepherd RB eds. Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Aspen Publications , 2000: 111-188.
29.
Majnemer A , Mazer B . New directions in the outcome evaluation of children with cerebral palsy . Semin Pediatr Neurol2004; 11: 11-17 .
30.
Mitchell T , Cusick A . Evaluation of a client-centred paediatric rehabilitation programme using goal attainment scaling . Aust Occup Ther J1998; 45: 7-17 .
