Short-term effects on mobility,activities of daily living and health-related quality of life of a Conductive Education programme for adults with multiple sclerosis,Parkinson's disease and stroke

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of 10 sessions of Conductive Education on mobility, functional independence and health-related quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and stroke.

Design: Observational, pretest—posttest design.

Setting: The National Institute of Conductive Education, Birmingham, UK.

Participants: One hundred and twenty-nine self-referred community-living individuals with moderate disability.

Intervention: Following an individual consultation, participants attended 10 diagnostic-specific group sessions of Conductive Education, scheduled daily or less commonly weekly.

Outcome measures: All participants were assessed using the Barthel Index and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily living Index. Stroke, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease patients also completed the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey, the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54 questionnaire (MSQoL-54) and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) respectively.

Results: One hundred and five individuals completed the programme as well as all pre and post-assessments. Of these, 34 had suffered a stroke, 55 had Parkinson's disease and 16 had multiple sclerosis. Stroke patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily living Index (mean change 3.4, P<0.001) and the SF-36 mental health subsection (mean change 7.8, P<0.001). Non-significant trends towards improved physical and mental function were demonstrated by other outcome measures across all three diagnoses.

Conclusions: The results emphasize potential benefits of Conductive Education for individuals with stroke. The results will inform further randomized comparisons of the effects of Conductive Education in neurologically disabled people.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Read J. , Sutton A. Conductive education for adults with motor disorders. Br J Ther Rehabil 1995; 2: 675-78.

Sutton A. Conductive Education as rehabilitation. In Roffe C ed. Proceedings of the 6th National CME conference , 2001, Keele. University of Keele, 2002: 38-45.

Whitall J. , McCombe WS , Silver KH , Macko RF Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 2390-95.

Feys HM , de Weerdt WJ , Selz BE et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: A single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke 1998; 29: 785-92.

Nuyens GE , de Weerdt WJ , Spaepen Jr AJ , Kiekens C. , Feys HM Reduction of spastic hypertonia during repeated passive knee movements in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 ; 83: 930-35.

Butefisch C. , Hummelsheim H. , Denzler P. , Mauritz KH Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995; 130: 59-68.

Brown M. , Mikula-Toth A. Adult Conductive Education. Stanley Thornes, 1997.

Bandyopadhyay S. , Beynon J. , Hallam S. , Corne J. , OMahony M. Conductive education-based physiotherapy in Parkinsons disease. Br J Ther Rehabil 2002 ; 9: 176-79.

Cott CA , Wright FV An evaluation of a conductive education program for adults with neurological disability. Physiother Can 2001; 53: 182-89.

10.

Laver A. , Brown M. The evaluation of a short-term conductive education programme with a sample of 12 adults with a primary diagnosis of stroke. Conductive Education Occasional Papers 1995; 2: 45-60.

11.

McDowell I. , Newell C. The 10-Item Modified Barthel Index. In Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, second edition. Oxford University Press, 1996.

12.

Nouri FM , Lincoln NB An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 301-305.

13.

Ware JJ , Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36®): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.

14.

Ware JJ , Snow K. , Kosinski M. , Gandek B. SF-36® Health Survey manual and interpretation guide. New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, 1993.

15.

Vickrey B. , Hays R. , Harooni R. , Myers L. , Ellison E. A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 187-206.

16.

Jenkinson C. , Fitzpatrick R. , Peto V. The Parkinsons disease questionnaire: User manual for the PDQ-39, PDQ-8 and PDQ summary index. Health Services Research Unit, Department of Public Health, 1998.

17.

Peto V. , Jenkinson C. , Fitzpatrick R. , Greenhall R. The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well-being for individuals with Parkinsons disease. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 241-48.

18.

Johnson SK , Frederick J. , Kaufman M. , Mountjoy B. A controlled investigation of bodywork in multiple sclerosis. J Altern Complement Med 1999; 5: 237-43.

19.

Stallibrass C. , Sissons P. , Chalmers C. Randomized controlled trial of the Alexander Technique for idiopathic Parkinsons disease. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 705-18.