Aim: To develop a grounded theory of nursing’s contribution to patient rehabilitation from the perspective of nurses working in inpatient rehabilitation.
Design: Grounded theory method, informed by the theoretical perspective of symbolic interactionism, was used to guide data collection and analysis, and the development of a grounded theory.
Setting: Five inpatient rehabilitation units in Australia.
Participants: Thirty-five registered and 18 enrolled nurses participated in audio-taped interviews and/or were observed during periods of their everyday practice.
Findings: The analysis revealed a situation whereby nurses made decisions about when to ‘opt in’ and when to ‘opt out’ of inpatient rehabilitation. This occurred on two levels: with their interaction with patients and allied health professionals, and when faced with negative system issues that impacted on their ability to contribute to patient rehabilitation. The primary contribution nurses made to inpatient rehabilitation was working directly with patients, enabling them to self-care. Nurses coached patients when their decisions about ‘opting in’ and ‘opting out’ were based on assessment of the person in their particular context. In contrast, the nurses mostly distanced themselves from system-based problems, ‘opting out’ of addressing them. They did this not to make their working lives easier, but more manageable.
Conclusion: System-based problems impacted negatively on the nurses’ ability to deliver comprehensive rehabilitation care. As a consequence, some nurses felt unable to influence the care and they withdrew professionally to make their work lives more manageable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Gibbon B.Career aspirations of staff working on a stroke unit. Br J Ther Rehabil1994; 7: 436-42.
2.
Waters KRGetting dressed in the early morning: styles of staff/patient interaction on rehabilitation hospital wards for elderly people. J Adv Nurs1994; 19: 239-48.
3.
Kirkevold M.The role of nursing in the rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: Towards a unified theoretical perspective. Adv Nurs Sci1997; 19: 55-64.
4.
Burton CRA description of the nursing role in stroke rehabilitation. J Adv Nurs2000; 32: 174-81.
5.
Singleton JKNurses’ perspectives of encouraging clients’ care-of-self in a short-term rehabilitation unit within a long-term care facility . Rehabil Nurs2000; 25: 23-35.
6.
Long AF, Kneafsey R., Ryan J., Berry J.The role of the nurse within the multi-professional rehabilitation team. J Adv Nurs2002; 37: 70-78.
7.
O’Connor SENursing interventions in stroke rehabilitation: A study of nurses’ views of their pattern of care in stroke units. Rehabil Nurs2000; 25: 224-30.
8.
O’Connor SEMode of care delivery in stroke rehabilitation nursing: a development of Kirkevold’s unified theoretical perspective of the role of the nurse. Clin Effect Nurs2000; 4: 180-88.
9.
Pryor J., Smith C.A framework for the specialty practice of rehabilitation nursing. Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney Monograph Series No 4. Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Ryde, NSW, 2000.
10.
Pryor J., Smith C.A framework for the role of registered nurses in the specialty practice of rehabilitation nursing in Australia. J Adv Nurs2002; 39: 249-57.
11.
I Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses’ Association.Rehabilitation Nursing Competency standards for Registered Nurses. Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses’ Association, Putney, NSW, 2003.
12.
Caldwell K., Atwal A., Copp G., Brett-Richards M., Coleman K.Team working. Preparing for practice: how well are practitioners prepared for teamwork. Br J Nurs2006-2007; 15: 1250-54.
13.
Dalley J., Sim J.Nurses’ perceptions of physiotherapists as rehabilitation team members . Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 380-89.
14.
Hill MC, Johnson J.An exploratory study of nurses’ perceptions of their role in neurological rehabilitation. Rehabil Nurs1999; 24: 152-57.
15.
Booth J., Waters KRThe multifaceted role of the nurse in the day hospital. J Adv Nurs1995; 22: 700-706.
16.
Strasser DC , Falconer JA, Herrin JS, Bowen SE, Stevens AB, Uomoto J.Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2005 ; 86: 403-409.
17.
Charon JMSymbolic interactionism: an introduction, an interpretation, an integration , fifth edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989.
18.
Flick U.An introduction to qualitative researchLondon: Sage, 1998.
19.
Ezzy D.Qualitative analysis: practice and innovationsCrows Nest : Allen & Unwin, 2002.
20.
Dingwall R. , Murphy E., Watson P., Greatbatch D., Parker S.Catching goldfish: Quality in qualitative research. J Health Serv Res Policy1998; 3: 167-72.
21.
Glaser BGTheoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press, 1978.
22.
Glaser BG, Strauss ALThe discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967 .
23.
Strauss A., Corbin J.Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques . Newbury Park: Sage, 1990.
24.
Strauss A., Corbin J.Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedure for developing grounded theory, second edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.
25.
Glaser BGBasics of grounded theory analysis: emergence vs forcing. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press, 1992.
26.
Glaser BGDoing grounded theory: issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press, 1998.
27.
Rodgers B., Cowles K.The qualitative research audit trail: a complex collection of documentation . Res Nurs Health1993; 16: 219-26.
28.
Guba EG, Lincoln YSFourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage, 1989.
29.
Sandelowski M.Reembodying qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res2002; 12: 104-15.
30.
O’Connell B., Irurita VFFacilitating the process of theory development by creating a visual data analogue trail. Grad Res Nurs2000; 2: 1-7.
31.
Hall WA, Callery P.Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: incorporating reflexivity and relationality . Qual Health Res2001; 11: 257-72.
32.
Pryor J., O’Connell B.Incongruence between nurses’ and patients’ understandings and expectations of rehabilitation. J Clin Nurs2009; 18: 1766-74.
33.
Pryor J.Coaching patients to self-care: a primary responsibility of nursing. Int J Older People Nurs2009; 4: 79-88.
34.
Pryor J.A nursing perspective on the relationship between nursing and allied health in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil2008; 30: 314-22.
35.
Pryor J.Role ambiguity in rehabilitation settings: a professional concern for nursing . Collegian2007; 14: 25-31.
36.
Pryor J.Nurses’ responses to systemic constraints in the inpatient rehabilitation setting. J Australasian Rehabil Nurses Assoc2008; 11: 17-26.
37.
Long A., Kneafsey R., Berry J., Ryan J., Howard R.Teamworking in rehabilitation: exploring the role of the nurse. London: The English Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health, 2001.
38.
Spooner-Lane RS, Patton WADeterminants of burnout among public hospital nurses. Aust J Adv Nurs2007; 25: 8-16.
39.
Mumma CMRehabilitation and rehabilitation nursing. Crit Care Nurs Clin N Am2001; 13: 335-40.
40.
Michael K.A case for rehabilitation in palliative care. Rehabil Nurs2001; 26: 84, 113.
41.
Neal LJThe rehabilitation nurse in the home care setting: Care of the client with HIV or AIDS. Rehabil Nurs1997; 22: 239-42.
42.
Clay M.Rehabilitation in nursing homes. Nurs Older People2001; 13: 21-25.
43.
Williams A. , Botti M.Issues concerning the on-going care of patients with comorbidities in acute care and post-discharge in Australia: a literature review. J Adv Nurs2002; 40: 131-40.
44.
Landefeld CS , Palmer RM, Kresevic DM, Fortinsky RH, Kowal J.A randomised trial of care in a hospital medical unit especially designed to improve the functional outcomes of acutely ill older patients. N Engl J Med1995; 332: 1338-44.
45.
Mahoney JE, Sager MA, Jalaluddin M.New walking dependence associated with hospitalisation for acute medical illness: incidence and significance. J Gerontol Med Sci1998; 53: 307-12.
46.
Sager MA, Franke T., Inouye SK et al. Functional outcomes of acute medical illness and hospitalisation in older persons. Arch Intern Med1996; 165: 645-52.
47.
Bosley R.Geriatric rehab should be widely available. Hosp Healthcare2002; April: 16-17.
48.
McLellan L.Introduction to rehabilitation. In Wilson BA, McLellan DL eds. Rehabilitation studies handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1997: 1-19.
49.
Pryor J.Nursing and rehabilitation. In Pryor J ed. Rehabilitation - a vital nursing function. Deakin, ACT: Royal College of Nursing Australia, 1999: 1-13.
50.
Buchan H.Different countries, different cultures: convergent or divergent evolution for healthcare quality?Qual Healthcare1998 ; 7: S62-S67.
