‘Feeling sad and useless’: an investigation into personal acceptance of disability and its association with depression following stroke

Abstract

Objectives: To study the association of acceptance of disability with depression following stroke and its ability to predict depression at follow-up.

Design: A prospective cohort mixed (quantitative and qualitative) design was used.

Setting and subjects: Patients admitted to a stroke unit were consecutively recruited. Eighty-nine participated at one month and 81 were followed up nine months post stroke.

Main measures: Depressive disorder was assessed using a structured clinical interview. Disability and acceptance of disability were measured using self-report scales. At one month post stroke, 60 consecutive participants also participated in open-ended interviews exploring their individual concerns about having had a stroke and their responses were analysed qualitatively.

Results: One-third of participants were found to have depression (29/89; 33% at one month and 24/81; 30% at nine months). Non-acceptance of disability remained associated with depression after controlling for age, gender, original stroke severity and current disability at one month (odds ratio (OR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09—1.47) and nine months (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.22—1.75). Also, non-acceptance of disability measured at one month independently predicted depression measured at nine months (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.05—1.35). The qualitative findings illustrated a self-reproachful element to non-acceptance of disability. Patients with depression often said that they ‘should still’ be capable and sometimes referred to themselves as ‘useless’; whereas patients who were not depressed commonly reported having accepted stroke-related disability.

Conclusions: These finding suggest that personal beliefs about accepting disability are associated with and predict emotional adaptation following stroke.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hackett ML , Yapa C. , Parag V. , Anderson CS Frequency of depression after stroke: a systematic review of observational studies. Stroke 2005; 36: 1330-40.

Carson, AJ , MacHale S. , Allen K. , Lawrie SM , Dennis M. , House A. , Sharpe, M. Depression after stroke and lesion location: a systematic review. Lancet 2000; 356: 122-26.

Hackett ML , Anderson CS Predictors of depression after stroke: a systematic review of observational studies. Stroke 2005; 36: 2296-301.

Wade D. , Leigh-Smith J. , Hewer R. Depressed mood after stroke. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151: 200-205.

Whyte EM , Mulsant BH Post stroke depression: epidemiology, pathophysiology and biological treatment . Soc Biol Psychiatry 2002; 52: 253-64.

House A. Depression after stroke. BMJ 1987; 294: 76-78.

Haaga DA , Dyck MJ , Ernst D. Empirical status of cognitive theory of depression. Psychol Bull 1991; 110: 215-36.

Morrison V. , Johnston M. , MacWalter R. Predictors of distress following an acute stroke: disability, control cognitions and satisfaction with care. Psychol Health 2000; 15: 395-407.

Thomas SA , Lincoln NB Factors related to depression after stroke. Br J Clin Psychol 2006; 45: 49-61.

10.

Lewis SC , Dennis MS , O’Rourke SJ , Sharpe M. Negative attitudes among short-term stroke survivors predict worse long-term survival. Stroke 2001; 32: 1640-45.

11.

American Heart Association. Know the facts get the stats: our guide to heart disease, stroke and risks. Dallas: American Heart Association, 2002.

12.

Wescott, P. Stroke - questions and answers. London: The Stroke Association, 2000.

13.

Wolfe C. , Rudd T. , Beech R. Executive summary and principal recommendations for research and developments of stroke services and research. In Wolfe C , Rudd T , Beech R. eds. Stroke services and research. London: The Stroke Association, 1996.

14.

Dembo T. , Leviton G. , Wright B. Adjustment to misfortune - a problem of social-psychological rehabilitation . Artif Limbs 1956; 3: 4-62.

15.

Wright B. Physical disability: a psychosocial approach. second edition. New York: Harper Row, 1983.

16.

Townend E. , Tinson D. , Kwan J. , Sharpe M. Fear of recurrence and beliefs about preventing recurrence in persons who have suffered a stroke. J Psychosom Res 2006 ; 61: 747-55.

17.

Hodkinson HM Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing 1972; 1: 233-38.

18.

Enderby PM , Wood VA , Wade DT , Langton-Hewer R. The Frenchay aphasia screening test: a short simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 1987; 8: 166-70.

19.

Richie J. , Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman A , Burgess R. eds. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994, 172-94.

20.

First M. , Spitzer R. , Gibbon M. , Williams J. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis 1 disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-I/P). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 2001.

21.

APA (American Psychiatric Association). Diagnostic criteria from DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

22.

Wade TD ed. NIH (The National Institutes of Health led by Brott, T). Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992, 293-96.

23.

Mahoney F. , Barthel D. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 56-61.

24.

Nouri FM , Lincoln NB An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 301-305.

25.

Felton B. , Revenson T. Coping with chronic illness: A study of illness controllability and the influence of coping strategies on psychological adjustment. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984; 52: 343-53.

26.

Hankey GJ , Jamrozik K. , Broadhurst RJ , Forbes S. , Burvill PW , Anderson CS , Stewart-Wynne EG Five-year survival after first-ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke 2000; 31: 2080-86.

27.

Clarke P. Towards a greater understanding of the experience of stroke: integrating quantitative and qualitative methods. J Aging Stud 2003 ; 17: 171-87.

28.

Stein J. , Shafqat S. , Doherty D. , Frates E. , Furie KL Patient knowledge and expectations for functional recovery after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: 591-96.

29.

Moore, D. Acceptance of disability and its correlates. J Soc Psychol 1998; 138: 13-25.

30.

Simpson B. Self concept and acceptance of disability in people with hearing and physical disabilities. Proc Br Psychol Soc 2001; 9: 253-54.

31.

Ellis-Hill CS , Payne S. , Ward C. Self-body split: issues of identity in physical recovery following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 725-33.

32.

Becker G. Continuity after stroke: implications of a life course disruption in old age . Gerontologist 1993; 33: 148-58.

33.

Schou I. , Ekeberg Ø. , Ruland CM , Sandvik I. , Kåresen. Pessimism as a predictor of emotional morbidity one year following breast cancer surgery. Psycho-Oncology 2004 ; 13: 309-20.

34.

Nicholl CR , Lincoln NB , Muncaster K. , Thomas S. Cognitions and post-stroke depression. Br J Clin Psychol 2002; 41: 221-31.

35.

NAO (National Audit Office). Reducing brain damage: Faster access to better stroke care. HC 452, Session 2005-2006: Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London: Stationary Office, 2006.

36.

Norman A. Public sector psychology in the wake of the 2005 White House Conference on Aging. Psychol Serv 2008; 5: 85-93.

37.

Karlin BE , Humphreys K. Improving Medicare coverage of psychological services for older Americans . Am Psychol 2007; 62: 637-49.

38.

Stiers W. , Stucky K. A survey of training in rehabilitation psychology practice in the United States and Canada. Rehabil Psychol 2008; 53: 536-43.