Rehabilitation in practice: Learning about research - how can trainees in rehabilitation medicine become competent in appraising and conducting research?
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online December, 2010
Rehabilitation in practice: Learning about research - how can trainees in rehabilitation medicine become competent in appraising and conducting research?
This series of articles for rehabilitation in practice aims to cover a knowledge element of the rehabilitation medicine curriculum. Nevertheless they are intended to be of interest to a multidisciplinary audience. The competency addressed in this article is ‘The trainee is able to critically appraise scientific, clinical and sociological research literature’ and ‘The trainee is able to complete a clinical audit study from the planning to final report stage’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Oxford English Dictionary Online. Accessed 2009 , from: www.oed.com/
2.
Joint Royal Colleges of Physicians Training Board.Specialty training for rehabilitation medicine. London: Joint Royal Colleges of Physicians Training Board, 2010.
3.
Australasian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine.Australasian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine training program. Module 3: Research. 2007. Accessed 20 July 2010, from http://afrm.racp.edu.au/index.cfm?objectid=77F86A21-9732-5163-B61DC0F70321AFE8.
4.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (Revised Common Program Requirements). 2007. Accessed 20 July 2010, from www.acgme.org/acWebsite/RRC_340/340_prIndex.asp .
5.
Whyte J., Boninger ML, Helkowski W., Braddom RLThe Rehabilitation Medicine Scientist Training Program: impact and lessons learned. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2008; 88: 169-79.
6.
European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.Log Book. European Union of Medical Specialists, 2007. Accessed 20 July 2010, from www.euro-prm.org/images/stories/Certification_docs/Logbook.doc .
7.
Imamura M., Hsing W., Dewey Platt L., Fregni F.How to develop research capacity using a collaborative training approach: the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISPRM) international training program experience. J Rehabil Med2009; 41: 295-6.
8.
Isprm.Research in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. Accessed 20 July 2010, from www.isprm.org/?CategoryID=351.
9.
Department of Health.The National Service Framework for long term conditions. London: Department of Health, 2005: 88-9.
10.
Webster J., Parker J., Moore D., Johnson J.Research activities and perspectives of individuals completing a research enrichment program for physiatrists. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2003; 82: 403-9.
11.
Blake D., Lezotte D., Yablon S., Rondinelli R.Structured research training in residency training programs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1994; 73: 245-50.
12.
Buschbacher R., Braddom RL, Buschbacher R., Braddom RLResident versus program director perceptions about PM&R research training. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1995; 74: 90-100.
13.
Pomeroy V., Tallis RC, Stitt E.Dismantling some barriers to evidence-based rehabilitation with ‘hands-on’ clinical research secondments. Physiotherapy2003; 89: 266-75.
14.
DeLisa JA, DeLisa JAShaping the future of medical rehabilitation research: Using the interdisciplinary research model. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 531-37.
15.
DeLisa JA, DeLisa JAAspects of training important to future physical and rehabilitation medicine physicians and our specialty training. J Rehabil Med2008; 40: 785-86.
16.
Frontera WR , Fuhrer MJ, Jette AM et al. Rehabilitation medicine summit: building research capacity. Executive summary. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2006; 87: 148-52.
17.
Stucki G., Stucki G.Developing human functioning and rehabilitation research. Part I: Academic training programs. J Rehabil Med2007; 39: 323-33.
18.
Stucki G., Celio M., Stucki G., Celio M.Developing human functioning and rehabilitation research. Part II: Interdisciplinary university centers and national and regional collaboration networks. J Rehabil Med2007; 39: 334-42.
19.
Wade DT, Wade DTBarriers to rehabilitation research, and overcoming them. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 1-4.
20.
DeLisa JAAcademic physiatry. Trends, opportunities and challenges. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1993 ; 72: 113-16.
21.
Braddom RL, Braddom RLWhy is physiatric research important?Am J Phys Med Rehabil1991; 70: 61-2.
22.
DeLateur B.Fostering research in the physiatrist’s future or, there is nothing quite so practical as a good, sound theory. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71: S4-S6.
23.
Boninger ML , Chan L., Harvey R. et al. Resident research education in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a practical approach. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2001; 80: 706-12.
24.
Stucki G., Reinhardt JD, Grimby G., Stucki G., Reinhardt JD, Grimby G.Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields. Part II: Conceptual descriptions and domains for research. J Rehabil Med2007; 39: 299-307.
25.
Stucki G., Grimby G., Stucki G., Grimby G.Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields. Part I: Developing a comprehensive structure from the cell to society . J Rehabil Med2007; 39: 293-8.
26.
Tate DGThe state of rehabilitation research: art or science?Arch Phys Med Rehabil2006; 87: 160-6.
27.
Stewart P.Academic medicine: a faltering engine. BMJ2002; 324: 437-8.
28.
Hakansson A. , Beckman A., Ekvall E., Merlo J., Mansson N-O .Research methods courses as a means of developing academic general practice. Scand J Primary Health Care2005; 23: 132-6.
29.
Macfarlane F., Shaw S., Greenhalgh T., Carter Y.General practices as emergent research organizations: a qualitative study into organizational development. Fam Pract2005; 22: 298-304.
30.
Safa M., Jazieh A-R.Lack of a uniform approach to clinical research training for hematology oncology fellows. J Cancer Educ2006; 21: 166-8.
31.
Nahleh Z., Komrokji R., Jazieh A-R., Sparks D.Cancer research training: the Southwest Oncology Group Young Investigator Training Program (YITP). J Cancer Educ2006 ; 21: 77-9.
32.
Wojtecki C. , Wade M., Pato M.Teaching interested clinicians how to develop research projects. Acad Psychiatry2007; 31: 168-70.
33.
Kohlwes R., Shunk R., Avins A., Garber J., Bent S., Shlipak M.The PRIME curriculum. Clinical research training during residency. J Gen Intern Med2006; 21: 506-9.
34.
Ried K., Montgomery B., Stocks N., Farmer E.General practice research training: impact of the Australian Registrar Research workshop on research skills, confidence, interest and involvement of participants . Fam Pract2008; 25: 119-26.
35.
Leira E., Granner M., Torner J., Callison R., Adams Jr H.Education research: the challenge of incorporating formal research methodology training in a neurology residency. Neurology2008; 70: 79-84.
36.
Dores G., Chang S., Berger V., Perkins S., Hursting S., Weed D.Evaluating research training outcomes: experince from the cancer prevention fellowship program at the National Cancer Institute. Acad Med2006; 81: 535-41.
37.
Strydom A., Higgins N.Are dedicated research posts of value to psychiatry trainees?Psychiatr Bull2004; 28: 260-3.
38.
Dodani S., Kazmi K., Laporte R., Wilson J.Effectiveness of research training workshop taught by traditional and video-teleconference methods in a developing country. Global Public Health2009; 4: 82-95.
39.
Chapman G., Sellaeg K., Levy-Milne R., Barr S.Towards increased capacity for practice-based research among health professionals: implementing a multisite qualitative research project with dieticians. Qual Health Res2007; 17: 902-7.
40.
DeLisa JA, Jain SS, Campagnolo D. et al. A method to assess the trainee profiles of medical students attracted to our physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1993; 72: 2-5.
