A quasi-experimental feasibility study to determine the effect of a systematic treatment programme on the scores of the Nottingham Adjustment Scale of individuals with visual field deficits following stroke
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2011
A quasi-experimental feasibility study to determine the effect of a systematic treatment programme on the scores of the Nottingham Adjustment Scale of individuals with visual field deficits following stroke
Objective: To evaluate a systematic treatment programme developed by the
researcher that targeted aspects of visual functioning affected by visual field
deficits following stroke.
Design: The study design was a non-equivalent control (conventional)
group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental feasibility design, using multisite data
collection methods at specified stages.
Setting: The study was undertaken within three acute hospital settings
as outpatient follow-up sessions.
Subjects: Individuals who had visual field deficits three months post
stroke were studied.
Interventions: A treatment group received routine occupational therapy
and an experimental group received, in addition, a systematic treatment programme.
The treatment phase of both groups lasted six weeks.
Main measures: The Nottingham Adjustment Scale, a measure developed
specifically for visual impairment, was used as the primary outcome measure.
Results: The change in Nottingham Adjustment Scale score was compared
between the experimental (n = 7) and conventional
(n = 8) treatment groups using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test.
The result of Z =−2.028
(P =0.043) showed that there was a
statistically significant difference between the change in Nottingham Adjustment
Scale score between both groups.
Conclusions: The introduction of the systematic treatment programme
resulted in a statistically significant change in the scores of the Nottingham
Adjustment Scale.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JulkunenLTenovnuoOJaaskelainenSHamalainenH. Rehabilitation of chronic post-stroke visual field
defect with computer-assisted training: a clinical neuropsychological
study. Restor Neurol Neurosci2003; 21:
19–28.
2.
KerkhoffGMunBingerGEberle-StraussGStogererE. Rehabilitation of hemianopic alexia in patients with
postgeniculate visual field disorders. Neuropsychol
Rehabil1992; 2:
21–42.
3.
KastenESabelB. Visual field enlargement after computer training in
brain-damaged patients with homonymous deficits: and open pilot
trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci1995; 8:
113–27.
4.
PambakianAMannanSHodgsonTKennardC. Saccadic visual search training: a treatment for
patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry2004; 75:
1443–7.
5.
SabelBKenkelSKastenE. Vision restoration therapy (VRT) efficacy as assessed
by comparative perimetric analysis and subjective questionnaires.
Restor Neurol Neurosci2004; 22:
399–420.
6.
ZihlJ. Visual scanning behaviour in patients with homonymous
hemianopia. Neuropsychologia1995; 33:
297–303.
7.
ZihlJVon CramonD. Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with
postgeniculate damage. Brain1985; 108:
335–65.
8.
NellesGEsserJEcksteingATiedeAGerhardHDienerH. Compensatory visual field training for patients with
hemianopia after stroke. Neurosci Lett2001; 306:
189–92.
9.
DoddsABaileyPPearsonAYatesL. Psychological factors in acquired visual impairment:
the development of a scale of adjustment. J Vis Impair
Blind1991; Sept:
306–10.
10.
AllenM. The meaning of visual impairment to visually impaired
adults. J Adv Nurs1989; 14:
640–6.
11.
KauhanenMKorpelainenJHiltunenP. Poststroke depression correlates with cognitive
impairment and neurological deficits. Stroke1999; 30:
1875–80.
12.
Taylor L. A mixed methods study of the development and impact of a
systematic treatment programme for visual field deficits following
stroke. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia School of Allied
Health Professions, 2006.
13.
DoddsANgLYatesL. Residential rehabilitation 2. Psychological outcome
of rehabilitation. The New Beacon J Blind Welfare1992; LXXVI:
373–7.
14.
KodsiSYoungeB. The four metre confrontation visual field
test. J Clin Neuro-ophthalmol1993; 13:
40–3.
15.
WelshR. Finger counting in the four quadrants as a method of
visual field gross screening. Arch Ophthalmol1961; 66:
678–9.
16.
GrayCFrenchJBatesDCartlidgeNVenablesGJamesO. Recovery of visual fields in acute stroke: homonymous
hemianopia associated with adverse prognosis. Age
Ageing1989; 18:
419–21.
17.
EnderbyPWoodVWadeDLangton HewerR. The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test; a short, simple
test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int
Rehabil Med1987; 8:
166–70.
18.
WadeDVergisE. The short orientation–memory–concentration test: a
study of its reliability and validity. Clin
Rehabil1999; 13:
164–70.
19.
WilsonBCockburnJHalliganP. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial
neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1987; 68:
98–102.
20.
ShahSVanclayFCooperB. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for
stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol1989; 8:
703–9.
21.
BoutronIMoherDAltmanDSchulzKRavaudPCONSORTgroup. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomize trials
of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.
Ann Intern Med2008; 148:
295–309.
22.
TurnerAFosterMJohnstonS. Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction – principles,
skills and practice, third edition.
Edinburgh: Churchill
Livingstone, 1992.
23.
AhlsioBBrittonMMurrayVTheorellT. Disablement and quality of life after
stroke. Stroke1984; 15:
886–90.
