A randomized controlled trial of the effects of muscle stretching,manual therapy and steroid injections in addition to ‘stay active’ care on health-related quality of life in acute or subacute low back pain
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2011
A randomized controlled trial of the effects of muscle stretching,manual therapy and steroid injections in addition to ‘stay active’ care on health-related quality of life in acute or subacute low back pain
Objective: To evaluate the health-related quality of life effects of muscle stretching, manual therapy and steroid injections in addition to ‘stay active’ care in acute or subacute low back pain patients.
Study design: A randomized, controlled trial during 10 weeks with four treatment groups.
Setting: Nine primary health care and one outpatient orthopaedic hospital department.
Subjects: One hundred and sixty patients with acute or subacute low back pain.
Interventions: Ten weeks of ‘stay active’ care only (group 1), or ‘stay active’ and muscle stretching (group 2), or ‘stay active’, muscle stretching and manual therapy (group 3), or ‘stay active’, muscle stretching, manual therapy and steroid injections (group 4).
Main measures: The Gothenburg Quality of Life instrument subscales Well-being score and Complaint score.
Results: In a multivariate analysis adjusted for possible outcome affecting variables other than the treatment given Well-being score was 68.4 (12.5), 72.1 (12.4), 72,3 (12.4) and 72.7 (12.5) in groups 1–4, respectively (P for trend <0.05). There were significant trends for the well-being components patience (P < 0.005), energy (P < 0.05), mood (P < 0.05) and family situation (P < 0.05). The remaining two components and Complaint score showed a non-significant trend towards improvement.
Conclusion: The effects on health-related quality of life were greater the larger the number of treatment modalities available. The ‘stay active’ treatment group, with the most restricted number of modalities, had the most modest health-related quality of life improvement, while group 4 with the most generous choice of treatment modalities, had the greatest improvement.
NachemsonALJonssonE. Neck and back pain: The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.
2.
van TulderMWKoesBWBouterLM. A cost-of-illness study of back pain in the Netherlands. Pain1995; 62(2): 233–240.
3.
GrotleMBroxJIVeierødMBGlomsrødBLønnJHVøllestadNK. Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: patients consulting primary care for the first time. Spine2005; 30: 976–982.
4.
JacobTBarasMZeevAEpsteinL. A longitudinal, community-based study of low back pain outcomes. Spine2004; 29: 1810–1817.
5.
HestbaekLLeboeuf-YdeCMannicheC. Low back pain: what is the long-term course? A review of studies of general patient populations. Eur Spine J2003; 12: 149–165.
6.
van den HoogenHJKoesBWvan EijkJTBouterLMDevilleW. On the course of low back pain in general practice: a one year follow up study. Ann Rheum Dis1998; 57: 13–19.
7.
PincusTSantosRBreenABurtonKAUnderwoodMR. A review and proposal for a core set of prognostic factors for prospective cohorts in low back pain: a consensus statement. Arthritis Rheum2008; 59: 14–24.
8.
KarjalainenKMalmivaaraAvan TulderM. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low-back pain among wotking age adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2003(2): CD002193–CD002193.
9.
LintonSJ. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine2000; 25: 1148–1156.
10.
MasonVLSkevingtonSMOsbornM. Assessing the properties of the WHOQOL-Pain: quality of life in chronic low back pain patients during treatment. Clin J Pain2010; 26: 583–592.
11.
BouterLMvan TulderMWKoesBW. Methodologic issues in low back pain research in primary care. Spine1998; 23: 2014–2020.
12.
SaundersCEggerMDonovanJ. Reporting on quality of life in randomised control trials: Bibliographic study. BMJ1998; 317: 1191–1194.
13.
DeyoRAAnderssonGBombardierC. Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain. Spine1994; 19(suppl): 2032S–6S.
14.
UnderwoodMRMortonVFarrinATeamUBT. Do baseline characteristics predict respons to treatment for low back pain? Secondary analysis of the UK BEAM dataset. Rheumatology2007; 46: 1297–1302.
15.
GoldbyLJMooreAPDoustJTrewME. A randomized controlled trial investigating the efficiency of musculoskeletal physiotherapy on chronic low back disorder. Spine2006; 31: 1083–1093.
16.
NiemistöLLahtinen-SuopankiTRissanenPLindgrenK-ASarnaSHurriH. A randomized trial of combined manipulation, stabilizing exercises, and physician consultation compared to physician consultation alone for chronic low back pain. Spine2003; 28: 2185–2191.
17.
HayEMullisRLewisM. Comparison of physical treatments versus a brief pain-management programme for back pain in primary care: a randomised clinical trial in physiotherapy practice. Lancet2005; 365: 2024–2030.
18.
WandBMBirdCMcAuleyJHMacDowellMDe SouzaLH. Early intervention for the management of acute low back pain: a single-blind randomized controlled trial of biopsychosocial education, manual therapy, and exercise. Spine2004; 29: 2350–2356.
19.
HurleyDAMcDonoughSMDempsterMMooreAPBaxterGD. A randomized clinical trial of manipulative therapy and interferential therapy for acute low back pain. Spine2004; 29: 2207–2216.
20.
LintonSJHalldénK. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain1998; 14: 209–215.
21.
RabinRde CharroF. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med2001; 33: 337–343.
22.
TibblinGTibblinBPecivaSKullmanSSvärdsuddK. ‘The Göteborg quality-of life instrument’ – an assessment of well-being and symptoms among men born 1913 and 1923. Scand J Prim Health Care1990(suppl): 35–40.
23.
BlombergSSvärdsuddKTibblinG. Manual therapy with steroid injections in low-back pain. Improvement of quality of life in a controlled trial with four months’ follow-up. Scand J Prim Health Care1993; 11: 83–90.
24.
BogefeldtJPGrunnesjöMISvärdsuddKFBlombergSEI. Sick leave reductions from a comprehensive manual therapy programme for low back pain. The Gotland low back pain study. Clin Rehabil2008; 22: 529–541.
25.
GrunnesjöMIBogefeldtJPSvärdsuddKFBlombergSEI. A randomized controlled trial of stay-active care versus manual therapy in addition to stay-active care: functional variables and pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2004; 27: 431–441.
26.
BlombergS. A pragmatic management strategy for low-back pain - an integrated multimodal programme. In: HutsonMEllisRTextbook of musculoskeletal medicine, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. part 4.
27.
WaddellG. The back pain revolution. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1998.
28.
IndahlAVelundLReikeraasO. Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered: a randomized clinical trial. Spine1995; 20: 473–477.
29.
TorstensenTALjunggrenAEMeenHDOdlandEMowinkelPaf GeijerstamS. Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise in patients with chronic low back pain. A pragmatic, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine1998; 23: 2616–2624.
30.
EvjentOHambergJ. Muscle stretching in manual therapy, a clinical manual, the extremities. Alfta: Alfta Rehab Förslag, 1985.
31.
EvjentOHambergJ. Muscle stretching in manual therapy, a clinical manual, the spinal column and the TM-joint. Vol 2, Alfta: Alfta Rehab Förlag, 1985.
32.
SullivanMKarlssonJBengtssonCFurunesBLapidusLLissnerL. The Göteborg Quality of Life Instrument – a psychometric evaluation of assessments of symptoms and well-being among women in a general population. Scand J Prim Health Care1993; 11: 267–275.
33.
HaywoodKLGarrattAFitzpatrickR. Quality of life in older people: a structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Qual Life Res2005; 14: 1651–1668.
34.
CederlundRIwarssonSLundborgG. Quality of life in Swedish workers exposed to hand-arm vibration. Occup Ther Intern2007; 14: 156–169.
35.
SAS language and procedures. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2000.
36.
KindP. Measuring quality of life in evaluating clinical interventions: an overview. Ann Med2001; 33: 323–327.
37.
BrennanGPFritzJMHunterSJThackerayADelittoAErhardRE. Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/subacute ‘nonspecific’ low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine2006; 31: 623–631.
