The Stroke Assessment of Fall Risk (SAFR): predictive validity in inpatient stroke rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate relative accuracy of a newly developed Stroke Assessment of Fall Risk (SAFR) for classifying fallers and non-fallers, compared with a health system fall risk screening tool, the Fall Harm Risk Screen.

Design and setting:

Prospective quality improvement study conducted at an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit at a large urban university hospital.

Participants:

Patients admitted for inpatient stroke rehabilitation (N = 419) with imaging or clinical evidence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, between 1 August 2009 and 31 July 2010.

Interventions:

Not applicable.

Main outcome measure(s):

Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of both scales’ classifications, based on fall risk score completed upon admission to inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

Results:

A total of 68 (16%) participants fell at least once. The SAFR was significantly more accurate than the Fall Harm Risk Screen (p < 0.001), with area under the curve of 0.73, positive predictive value of 0.29, and negative predictive value of 0.94. For the Fall Harm Risk Screen, area under the curve was 0.56, positive predictive value was 0.19, and negative predictive value was 0.86. Sensitivity and specificity of the SAFR (0.78 and 0.63, respectively) was higher than the Fall Harm Risk Screen (0.57 and 0.48, respectively).

Conclusions:

An evidence-derived, population-specific fall risk assessment may more accurately predict fallers than a general fall risk screen for stroke rehabilitation patients. While the SAFR improves upon the accuracy of a general assessment tool, additional refinement may be warranted.

Keywords

Falls prediction rehabilitation stroke

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Suzuki

Sonoda

Misawa

Saitoh

Shimizu

Kotake

. Incidence and consequence of falls in inpatient rehabilitation stroke patients. Experimental Aging Res 2005; 31: 457–469.

Teasell

McRae

Foley

Bhardwaj

. The incidence and consequences of falls in stroke patients during inpatient rehabilitation: factors associated with high risk. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 329–333.

Czernuszenko

Czlonkowska

. Risk factors for falls in stroke patients during inpatient rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23: 176–188.

Rapport

Hanks

Millis

Deshpande

. Executive functioning and predictors of falls in the rehabilitation setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 629–633.

Nystrom

Hellstrom

. Fall risk six weeks from onset of stroke and the ability of the Prediction of Falls in Rehabilitation Settings Tool and motor function to predict falls. Clin Rehabil 2013; 27: 473–479.

Breisinger

Campbell

. Development and testing of the Stroke Assessment of Fall Risk (SAFR): A pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92(10): 1696.

Campbell

Matthews

. An Integrative review of factors associated with falls during post-stroke rehabilitation. J Nursing Scholarship 2010; 42(4): 404–413.

Morse

Tylko

. Development of a scale to identify the fall-prone patient. Can J Aging 1989; 8(4): 366–377.

Hendrich

. Predicting patient falls: Using the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model in clinical practice. Am J Nursing 2007; 107(11): 50–58.

10.

Gillespie

Robertson

Gillesptie

. Interventions for preventing falls ion older people living in the community (Review). The Cochrane Library 2012; (9).

11.

Rubenstein

Josephson

. Falls and their prevention in elderly people: what does the evidence show? Medical Clinics N Am 2006; 90: 807–824.

12.

Hanger

Wills

Wilkinson

. Classification of falls in stroke rehabilitation—not all falls are the same. Clin Rehabil 2014; 28(2): 183–195.

13.

Hill

Hoffman

Hill

. Measuring falls events in acute hospitals—A comparison of threereporting methods to identify missing data in the hospital reporting system. J Am Geriatrics Soc 2010; 58:1347–1352.

14.

Morse

. Preventing patient falls. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1997, p.151.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB