The ROARI project – Road Accident Acute Rehabilitation Initiative: a randomised clinical trial of two targeted early interventions for road-related trauma
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2015
The ROARI project – Road Accident Acute Rehabilitation Initiative: a randomised clinical trial of two targeted early interventions for road-related trauma
To determine the effectiveness of an Early Rehabilitation Intervention (ERI ) versus a Brief Education Intervention (BEI) following road trauma. Primary objective: return to work or usual activities at 12 weeks (for minor/moderate injury) and 24 weeks for major injury. Secondary objectives: Reduction in pain, anxiety, depression, disability and incidence of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and improved quality of life.
Design:
A multi-site single-blinded stratified randomized clinical trial (RCT).
Methods:
184 patients (92 in each arm) were recruited over 18 months and followed for 12 weeks (minor/moderate injury) and 24 weeks (major injury). Screening questionnaires at 2-4 weeks and follow-up interviews by phone for all outcome measures were undertaken. For those in the ERI group with a positive screen for high risk of persistent symptoms, an early assessment and intervention by a Rehabilitation Physician was offered. Those in the BEI group were sent written information and advised to see their GP.
Results:
89.4% of injuries were mild in this cohort. At 12 weeks 73.8% and 69.1% of patients in the ERI and the BEI groups respectively had returned to work or usual activities. There were no significant differences between the two intervention groups with respect to the primary or any secondary outcome measures.
Conclusion:
This is the first RCT of an ERI following road trauma in Australia. A targeted ERI is as effective as a BEI in assisting those with mild/moderate trauma to return to work or usual activities.
ConnellyLBSupanganR. The Economic Costs of Road Traffic Crashes: Australia, States and Territories. Acc Anal Prev2006; 38: 1087–1093.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). National Health Survey: Injuries, Australia, 2001. ABS, 2001.
3.
MathersCDVosETStevensonCEBeggSJ. The burden of disease and injury in Australia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization2001; 79: 1076–1084.
4.
KorenDArnonIKleinE. Acute stress response and posttraumatic stress disorder in traffic accident victims: A one year prospective follow up study. Am J Psychiatry1999; 156: 367–373.
5.
ReadKMKuferaJADischingerPCKernsTJHoSMBurgessAR. Life-altering outcomes after lower extremity injury sustained in motor vehicle crashes. J Trauma2004; 57: 815–823.
6.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Berry JG and Harrison JE 2008. Serious injury due to land transport accidents, Australia, 2005 -06. Injury research and statistics series number 42. Cat. no. INJCAT 113. Adelaide: AIHW.
7.
WandBMBirdCMcAuleyJHDoreCJMacDowellMDe SouzaLH. Early intervention for the management of acute low back pain: a single-blind randomized controlled trial of biopsychosocial education, manual therapy and exercise. Spine2004; 29: 2350–2356.
8.
KarjalainenKMalmivaaraAvan TulderMRoineRJauhiainenMHurriH. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain among working age adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2003:CD002193.
9.
SullivanMLAdamsHRhodenizerTStandishWD. A psychosocial risk factor–targeted intervention for the prevention of chronic pain and disability following whiplash injury. Phys Ther2006; 86: 8–18.
10.
PonsfordJ. Rehabilitation interventions after mild head injury. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005; 18: 692–697.
11.
PaniakCToller-LobeGReynoldsSMelnykANagyJ. A randomized trial of two treatments for mild traumatic brain injury: 1 year follow-up. Brain Inj. 2000; 14: 219–226.
12.
O’DonnellMLLauWTippingSHolmesACEllenSJudsonR. Stepped early psychological intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder, other anxiety disorders and depression following serious injury. J Trauma Stress2012; 25; 125–133.
13.
BrookeKFauxSGWilsonSFLiauwWBowmanMKlienL. Outcomes of motor vehicle crashes with fracture: a pilot study of early rehabilitation interventions. J Rehabil Med2014; 46: 335–340.
14.
Centre for Road Safety Transport for NSW, Road Traffic Crashes in New South Wales. Statistical statement for the year ended 31 December 2010. North Sydney: Centre for Road Safety Transport for NSW; 2012.
15.
GroahSLLibinALauderdaleMKrollTDeJongGHsiehJ. Beyond the evidence-based practice paradigm to achieve best practice in rehabilitation medicine: a clinical review. PM & R2009; 1: 941–50.
16.
WilliamsonODEpiGDGabbeBJPhysioBCameronPAEdwardsER. Predictors of moderate or severe pain 6 months after orthopaedic injury: a prospective cohort study. J Ortho Trauma2009; 23: 139–44.
17.
HoursMBernardMCharnayPChossegrosLJavouheyEFortE. Functional outcome after road-crash injury: description of the ESPARR victims cohort and 6-month follow-up results. Acc Anal Prev2010; 42: 412–21.
18.
LintonSJBoersmaK. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain2003; 19: 80–86.
19.
MacintyrePESchugSAScottDAVisserEJWalkerSM and Working Group of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Faculty of Pain Medicine. Acute Pain Management: Scientific Evidence (3rd Edition). Melbourne: ANZCA; 2010.
20.
ClayFJNewsteadSVWatsonWLOzanne-SmithJGuyJMcClureRJ. Bio-psychosocial determinants of persistent pain 6 months after non-life-threatening acute orthopaedic trauma. J Pain2010; 11: 420–30.
21.
KeefeFJRumbleMEScipioCDGiordanoLAPerriLM. Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science. J Pain2004; 5: 195–211.
22.
FauxSGDonaldsonLBrookeKJ. Motorcycle crash casualties and their In-hospital management – observations from St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney. Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety2009; 204: 30–32.
23.
KhanFBaguleyIJCameronID. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injuryMed J Aust2003; 178: 290–295.
24.
KhanFAmatyaBHoffmanK. Systematic review of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with multiple trauma. Br J Surg2012; 99(Suppl 1): 88–96.
25.
New South Wales Department of Health Agency for Clinical Innovation and the NSW Institute of Trauma and Injury Management. NSW Trauma Services. Chatswood: NSW Institute of Trauma and Injury Management; 2012.
26.
BakerSPO’NeillBHaddonWJrLongWB. The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma1974; 14: 187–196.
EllulJWatkinsCBarerD. Estimating total Barthel scores from just three items: the European Stroke Database ‘minimum dataset’ for assessing functional status at discharge from hospital. Age Ageing1998; 27: 115–22.
29.
SpitzerRLKroenkeKWilliamsJBLoweB. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med2006; 166: 1092–7.
30.
Pinto-MezaASerrano-BlancoAPenarrubiaMTBlancoEHaroJM. Assessing depression in primary care with the PHQ-9: can it be carried out over the telephone?J Gen Intern Med2005; 20: 738–742.
31.
HockingsRLMcAuleyJHMaherCG. A systematic review of the predictive ability of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Spine2008; 33: E494–500.
32.
LiskowBCampbellJNickelEJPowellBJ. Validity of the CAGE questionnaire in screening for alcohol dependence in a walk-in (triage) clinic. J Stud Alcohol1995; 56: 277–281.
33.
MayfieldDMcLeodGHallIP. The CAGE questionnaire: Validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry1974; 131; 1121–1123.
34.
Motor Accident Authority of NSW. Guidelines for the management of anxiety following motor vehicle accidents. Sydney: MAA. 2003; 1876958 170.
35.
Australasian Faculty of Pain Medicine and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Standards for the provision of inpatient rehabilitation medicine services in public and private hospitals. Sydney: RACP. 2011.
36.
BrazierJRobertsJTsuchiyaABusschbachJ. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ200413: 873–884.
37.
JohnsenLGHellumCNygaardOPStorheimKBroxJIRossvollI. Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders2013; 14: 148.
38.
OuimettePWadeMPrinsASchohnM. Identifying PTSD in primary care: comparison of the Primary Care-PTSD screen (PC-PTSD) and the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ). J Anxiety Disord2008; 22: 337–43.
MacKenzieEJMorrisJAJurkovichGJYasuiYCushingBMBurgessAR. Return to work following injury: the role of economic, social, and job-related factors. Am J Public Health1998; 88: 1630–1637.
41.
HarrisIAYoungJMJalaludinBBSolomonMJ. The effect of compensation on general health in patients sustaining fractures in motor vehicle trauma. J Ortho Trauma2008; 22: 216–220.
42.
UrquhartDMWilliamsonODGabbeBJCicuttiniFMCameronPARichardsonMD. Outcomes of patients with orthopaedic trauma admitted to level 1 trauma centres. ANZ J Surg2006; 76: 600–606.
43.
FortEBouffardECharnayPBernardMBoissonDLaumonB. Return to work following road accidents: factors associated with late work resumption. J Rehabil Med2011; 43: 283–291.
44.
ComperPBisschopSMCarnideNTriccoA. A systematic review of treatments for mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj2005; 19: 863–880.
45.
BellKRTemkinNREsselmanPCDoctorJNBombardierCHFraserRT. The effect of a scheduled telephone intervention on outcome after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab2005; 86 : 851–856.
46.
BuggATurpinGMasonSScholesC. A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of writing as a self-help intervention for traumatic injury patients at risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder. Behav Res Ther2009; 47: 6–12.
47.
WesselySBryantRAGreenbergNEarnshawMSharpleyJHughesJH. Does psychoeducation help prevent post traumatic psychological distress?Psychiatry2008; 71: 287–302.
48.
SheedyJHarveyEFauxSGeffenGShoresEA. Emergency department assessment of mild traumatic brain injury and the prediction of post concussive symptoms: a 3- month prospective study. J Head Trauma Rehabil2009; 24: 333–343.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
