To determine how motor imagery is being delivered in upper limb rehabilitation to guide practice and research.
Data source:
MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO databases were searched from 1987 to November 2014
Study selection:
English, adults, any clinical population or diagnosis, intervention for upper limb with an outcome measure used. All types of studies were included. Two authors independently selected studies for review using consensus.
Data extraction:
Seven motor imagery elements were extracted using a model implemented in sport research: PETTLEP model (Physical, Environment, Task, Timing, Learning, Emotion, and Perspective).
Results:
The search yielded 1107 articles with 1059 excluded leaving 48 articles for full review. A total of 38 articles involved individuals with stroke, five articles involved individuals with complex regional pain syndrome, and five articles for other conditions. Motor imagery elements most commonly described were physical, environment, task, and perspective. Elements less commonly described were timing, learning, and emotional aspects. There were significant differences between study populations (e.g. stroke and complex regional pain syndrome) and within populations on how motor imagery was delivered.
Conclusion:
Many of the imagery elements reviewed are not being considered or reported on in the selected studies. How motor imagery is being delivered within and between populations is inconsistent, which may lead to difficulties in determining key elements of effectiveness.
GuillotAColletC. Construction of the motor imagery integrative model in sport: A review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2008; 1: 31–44.
2.
MunzertJLoreyBZentgrafK. Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Res Rev2009; 60: 306–326.
3.
JacksonPLLafleurMFMalouinFRichardsCDoyonJ. Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 1133–1141.
4.
PageSJ. Imagery improves upper extremity motor function in chronic stroke patients: A pilot study. OTJR2000; 20: 200–215.
5.
PageSJLevinePSistoSJohnstonMV. A randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 233–240.
6.
PageSJLevinePSistoSAJohnstonMV. Mental practice combined with physical practice for upper-limb motor deficit in subacute stroke. Phys Ther2001; 81: 1455–1462.
7.
PageSJLevinePLeonardAC. Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2005; 86: 399–402.
8.
PageSJLevinePLeonardA. Mental practice in chronic stroke: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Stroke2007; 38: 1293–1297.
9.
PageSJSzaflarskiJPEliassenJCPanHCramerSC. Cortical plasticity following motor skill learning during mental practice in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2009; 23: 382–388.
10.
PageSJLevinePKhouryJC. Modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice thinking through better motor outcomes. Stroke2009; 40: 551–554.
11.
PageSJDunningKHermanVLeonardALevineP. Longer versus shorter mental practice sessions for affected upper extremity movement after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2011; 25: 627–637.
12.
LiuKPChanCCLeeTMHui-ChanCW. Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 1403–1408.
13.
LiuKPChanCCLeeTMHui-ChanCW. Mental imagery for relearning of people after brain injury. Brain Inj2004; 18: 1163–1172.
14.
LiuKPChanCCWongRS. A randomized controlled trial of mental imagery augment generalization of learning in acute poststroke patients. Stroke2009; 40: 2222–2225.
15.
Bovend’EerdtTJHDawesHSackleyCIzadiHWadeDT. Mental techniques during manual stretching in spasticity – A pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2009; 23: 137–145.
16.
Bovend’EerdtTJDawesHSackleyCIzadiHWadeDT. An integrated motor imagery program to improve functional task performance in neurorehabilitation: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2010; 91: 939–946.
17.
YooEParkEChungB. Mental practice effect on line-tracing accuracy in persons with hemiparetic stroke: A preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 1213–1218.
18.
StevensJAStoykovME. Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003; 84: 1090–1092.
19.
DijkermanHCIetswaartMJohnstonMMacWalterRS. Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clin Rehabil2004; 18: 538–549.
20.
CrosbieJHMcDonoughSMGilmoreDHWiggamMI. The adjunctive role of mental practice in the rehabilitation of the upper limb after hemiplegic stroke: A pilot study. Clin Rehabil2004; 18: 60–68.
21.
GaggioliAMeneghiniAMorgantiFAlcanizMRivaG. A strategy for computer-assisted mental practice in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2006; 20: 503–507.
22.
ButlerAJPageSJ. Mental practice with motor imagery: Evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2006; 87: 2–11.
23.
MullerKButefischCMSeitzRJHombergV. Mental practice improves hand function after hemiparetic stroke. Restorative Neurol Neurosci2007; 25: 501–511.
24.
HemmenBSeelenHA. Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase. Clin Rehabil2007; 21: 587–594.
25.
SimmonsLSharmaNBaronJPomeroyVM. Motor imagery to enhance recovery after subcortical stroke: Who might benefit, daily dose, and potential effects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2008; 22: 458–467.
26.
RiccioIIolasconGBarillariMRGimiglianoRGimiglianoF. Mental practice is effective in upper limb recovery after stroke: A randomized single-blind cross-over study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2010; 46: 19–25.
27.
CrajeCvan der GraafCLemFCGeurtsACSteenbergenB. Determining specificity of motor imagery training for upper limb improvement in chronic stroke patients: A training protocol and pilot results. Int J Rehabil Res2010; 33: 359–362.
28.
SantamatoAPanzaFFiloniS. Effect of botulinum toxin type A, motor imagery and motor observation on motor function of hemiparetic upper limb after stroke. Brain Inj2010; 24: 1108–1112.
29.
WuAJRadelJHanna-PladdyB. Improved function after combined physical and mental practice after stroke: A case of hemiparesis and apraxia. AJOT2011; 65: 161–168.
30.
TrobiaJGaggioliAAntoniettiA. Combined use of music and virtual reality to support mental practice in stroke rehabilitation. J Cyber Ther Rehabil2011; 4: 57–61.
31.
IetswaartMJohnstonMDijkermanHC. Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: Randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain2011; 134: 1373–1386.
32.
BraunSMBeurskensAJKleynenMOudelaarBScholsJMWadeDT. A multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare subacute ‘treatment as usual’ with and without mental practice among persons with stroke in dutch nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc2012; 13: 85.e1–85.e7.
33.
NilsenDMGillenGDiRussoTGordonAM. Effect of imagery perspective on occupational performance after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. AJOT2012; 66: 320–329.
34.
GuttmanABurstinABrownRBrilSDicksteinR. Motor imagery practice for improving sit to stand and reaching to grasp in individuals with poststroke hemiparesis. Top Stroke Rehab2012; 19: 306–319.
35.
HongIKChoiJBLeeJH. Cortical changes after mental imagery training combined with electromyography-triggered electrical stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Stroke2012; 43: 2506–2509.
36.
TimmermansAAAVerbuntJAvan WoerdenRMoennekensMPernotDHSeelenHAM. Effect of mental practice on the improvement of function and daily activity performance of the upper extremity in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc2013; 14: 204–212.
37.
GuillotALebonFVernayMGirbonJPDoyonJColletC. Effect of motor imagery in the rehabilitation of burn patients. J Burn Care Res2009; 30: 686–693.
38.
StenekesMWGeertzenJHNicolaiJ-ADe JongBMMulderT. Effects of motor imagery on hand function during immobilization after flexor tendon repair. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2009; 90: 553–559.
39.
GrangeonMGuillotASanchoP. Rehabilitation of the elbow extension with motor imagery in a patient with quadriplegia after tendon transfer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2010; 91: 1143–1146.
40.
GrangeonMRevolPGuillotARodeGColletC. Could motor imagery be effective in upper limb rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury? A case study. Spinal Cord2012; 50: 766–771.
41.
SmaniaNBazoliFPivaDGuidettiG. Visuomotor imagery and rehabilitation of neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1997; 78: 430–436.
42.
McCarthyMGraham BeaumontJThompsonRPringleH. The role of imagery in the rehabilitation of neglect in severely disabled brain-injured adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2002; 17: 407–422.
43.
FerreiraHPLeite LopesMALuizRRCardosoLAndreC. Is visual scanning better than mental practice in hemispatial neglect? Results from a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil2011; 18: 155–161.
44.
WelfringerALeifert-FiebachGBabinskyRBrandtT. Visuomotor imagery as a new tool in the rehabilitation of neglect: A randomized controlled study of feasibility and efficacy. Disabil Rehabil2011; 12: 2033–2043.
45.
Liefert-FiebachGWelfringerABabinskiRBrandtT. Motor imagery training in patients with chronic neglect: A pilot study. NeuroRehabil2013; 32: 43–58.
46.
MoseleyGL. Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: A randomised controlled trial. Pain2004; 108: 192–198.
47.
MoseleyGL. Is successful rehabilitation of complex regional pain syndrome due to sustained attention to the affected limb? A randomised clinical trial. Pain2005; 114: 54–61.
48.
MoseleyGL. Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology2006; 67: 2129–2134.
49.
MoseleyGLZaluckiNBirkleinFMarinusJVan HiltenJJLuomajokiH. Thinking about movement hurts: The effect of motor imagery on pain and swelling in people with chronic arm pain. Arthritis Care Res2008; 59: 623–631.
50.
WalzADUsichenkoTMoseleyGLLotzeM. Graded motor imagery and the impact on pain processing in a case of CRPS. Clin J Pain2013; 29: 276–279.
51.
MacIverKLloydDMKellySRobertsNNurmikkoT. Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery. Brain2008; 131: 2181–2191.
52.
Barclay-GoddardREStevensonTJPoluhaWThalmanL. Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2011; 5: CD005950.
53.
NilsenDMGillenGGordonAM. Use of mental practice to improve upper-limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. AJOT2010; 64: 695–708.
54.
SharmaNPomeroyVMBaronJC. Motor imagery: A backdoor to the motor system after stroke?Stroke2006; 37: 1941–1952.
55.
Zimmermann-SchlatterASchusterCPuhanMASiekierkaESteurerJ. Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil2008; 5: 8.
56.
BraunSMBeurskensAJBormPJSchackTWadeDT. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2006; 87: 842–852.
57.
BraunSKleynenMHeelMKruithofNWadeDBeurskensA. The effects of mental practice in neurological rehabilitation; A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Hum Neurosci2013; 7: 1–23.
58.
MalouinFJacksonPLRichardsCL. Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review. Front Hum Neurosci2013; 7: 1–20.
59.
HolmesPCollinsD. The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. J Appl Sport Psychol2001; 13: 60–83.
60.
SchusterCButlerJAndrewsBKischkaUEttlinT. Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: Study protocol of a randomised controlled pilot trial using a mixed methods approach. Trials2009; 10: 97.
61.
ColletCGuillotALebonFMacIntyreTMoranA. Measuring motor imagery using psychometric, behavioral, and psychophysiological tools. Exerc Sport Sci Rev2011; 39: 85–92.
62.
PerssonALVeenhuizenHZachrisonLGardG. Relaxation as treatment for chronic musculoskeletal pain a systematic review of randomised controlled studies. Physical Therapy Reviews2008; 13(5): 355–365.
63.
ManzoniGMPagniniFCastelnuovoGMolinariE. Relaxation training for anxiety: A ten-years systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry2008; 8: 41.
64.
van HeugtenCGregórioGWWadeD. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: a systematic review of content of treatment. Neuropsychol Rehabil2012; 22: 653–673.
