Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on arm function and decreasing unilateral spatial neglect in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the functional recovery of stroke patients with unilateral neglect.

Design:

Randomized controlled experimental study.

Setting:

Outpatient rehabilitation hospital.

Subjects:

Thirty patients with stroke were randomly assigned to two groups: an rTMS group (experimental) and a control group.

Interventions:

Stroke patients in the experimental group underwent comprehensive rehabilitation therapy and rTMS. Stroke patients in the control group underwent sham therapy and comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. Participants in both groups received therapy 5 days per week for 4 weeks.

Main measures:

Line bisection, Albert, Box and block and Grip strength tests were assessed before and after the four-week therapy period.

Results:

A significant difference in the post-training gains in Line bisection (16.53 SD 9.78 vs. 3.60 SD 5.02), Albert (14.13 SD 4.92 vs. 3.26 SD 2.01), Box and block (15.06 SD 9.68 vs. 6.93 SD 7.52), and Grip strength tests (3.60 SD 2.66 vs 0.80 SD 1.26) was observed between the experimental group and the control group (P<0.05). In addition, the effect size for gains in the experimental and control groups was very strong in AT, BBT (effect size=2.15, 0.77 respectively).

Conclusion:

We conclude that rTMS might be effective in improvement in reduction of the unilateral neglect and motor function.

Keywords

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation unilateral spatial neglect stroke

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Marotta

Mckeeff

Behrmann

Hemispatial neglect: its effects on visual perception and visually guided grasping. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 1262–1271.

Goldon

Leslie

Christopher

Visual neglect can be object-based or scene-based depending on task representation. Cortex 2004; 40: 237–246.

Katz

Ring

Soreker

Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Arch Phys Med & Rehabil 1999; 80: 379–384.

Kopp

Kunkel

Muhlnickel

Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke. Clin Neurosci 1999; 4: 807–810.

Dijkerman

Ietswarrt

Johnston

Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patient ? A pilot study. Clinical Rehabil 2004; 18: 538–549

Pandian

Arora

Kaur

. Mirror therapy in unilateral neglect after stroke (MUST trial): a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2014; 83:1012–1017.

Baker

Jalinous

Freeston

IL.

Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985; 1: 1106–1107.

Ridding

Rothwell

JC.

Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation?

Nat Rev Neurosci 2007; 8: 559–567.

Tao

Zhu

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on hand function recovery and excitability of the motor cortex after stroke: a meta-analaysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 93: 422–30.

10.

Kim

Min

. Facilitating visuospatial attention for the contralateral hemifield by repetitive TMS on the posterior parietal cortex. Neurosci Lett 2005; 382: 280–282.

11.

Chieffo

De Prezzo

Houdayer

. Deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil on lower limb motor function in chronic stroke: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95: 1141–1147.

12.

Folstein

McHugh

PR.

‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–198

13.

Bouska

Kwatny

Manual for application of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test to the adult population. Philadelphia: Academic therapy pubilcation, 1983

14.

Brighina

Bisiach

Oliveri

. 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans. Neurosci Lett, 2003; 336: 131–133.

15.

Bouska

Kwatny

Manual for application of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test to the adult population. Philadelphia: Academic therapy pubilcation, 1983

16.

Albert

ML.

A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology, 1973; 23: 658–684.

17.

Trombly

Radomski

MV.

Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction (5^th ed). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002.

18.

Lee

Jang

KP.

An analysis of grip strength for korean adults. J Ergo Soc Korea, 1997; 16: 565–572.

19.

Martin

Naeser

Theoret

. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Semin Speech Lang. 2004; 25: 181–191.

20.

Kleinman

Newhart

Davis

Right hemispatial neglect: frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke. Brain Cogn. 2007; 64: 50–59.

21.

Brighina

Bisiach

Oliveri

. 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2003; 336: 131–133.

22.

Mally

Dinya

Recovery of motor disability and spasticity in post-stroke after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Res Bull. 2008; 76: 388–396.

23.

Sasaki

Mizutani

Kakuda

. Comparison of the effects of high and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb hemiparesis in the early phase of stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013; 22: 413–418.

24.

Pomeroy

Cloud

Tallis

. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and muscle contraction to enhance stroke recovery: A randomized proof of principle and feasibility investigation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21: 509–517.

25.

Dafotakis

Grefkes

Eickhoff

SB.

Effects of r-TMS on grip force control following subcortical stroke. Exp Neurol. 2008; 211: 407–412.

26.

Livingston

Ingersoll

CD.

Intra-rater reliability of a transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to obtain motor evoked potentials. Int J Neurosci. 2008; 118: 239–256.

27.

Sugawara

Kasai

Facilitation of motor evoked potentials and H-reflexes of flexor carpi radialis muscle induced by voluntary teeth clenching. Hum Mov Sci. 2002; 21: 203–212.