Evaluate the effects of a Pilates exercise programme on walking and balance in people with multiple sclerosis and compare this exercise approach to conventional physical therapy sessions.
Design:
Randomized controlled trial.
Setting:
Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Subjects:
Forty-five people with multiple sclerosis, 29 females, mean age (SD) was 43.2 (11.6) years; mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (S.D) was 4.3 (1.3).
Interventions:
Participants received 12 weekly training sessions of either Pilates (n=22) or standardized physical therapy (n=23) in an outpatient basis.
Main measures:
Spatio-temporal parameters of walking and posturography parameters during static stance. Functional tests included the Time Up and Go Test, 2 and 6-minute walk test, Functional Reach Test, Berg Balance Scale and the Four Square Step Test. In addition, the following self-report forms included the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale.
Results:
At the termination, both groups had significantly increased their walking speed (P=0.021) and mean step length (P=0.023). According to the 2-minute and 6-minute walking tests, both groups at the end of the intervention program had increased their walking speed. Mean (SD) increase in the Pilates and physical therapy groups were 39.1 (78.3) and 25.3 (67.2) meters, respectively. There was no effect of group X time in all instrumented and clinical balance and gait measures.
Conclusions:
Pilates is a possible treatment option for people with multiple sclerosis in order to improve their walking and balance capabilities. However, this approach does not have any significant advantage over standardized physical therapy.
CameronMHLordS. Postural control in multiple sclerosis: Implications for fall prevention. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep2010; 10: 407–412.
2.
PetersonEWChoCCvon KochLFinlaysonML. Injurious falls among middle aged and older adults with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2008; 89: 1031–1037.
3.
KalronAAchironA. Postural control, falls and fear of falling in people with multiple sclerosis without mobility aids. J Neurol Sci2013; 335: 186–190.
4.
CattaneoDJonsdottirJZocchiMRegolaA. Effects of balance exercises on people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Clin Rehabil2007; 21: 771–781.
5.
StephensJDuSchuttleDHatcherCShmunesJSlaninkaC. Use of awareness through movement improves balance and balance confidence in people with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled study. Neurol Report2001; 25: 39–49.
6.
StraudiSBenedettiMGVenturiniEMancaMFotiCBasagliaN. Does robot-assisted gait training ameliorate gait abnormalities in multiple sclerosis? A pilot randomized-control trial. NeuroRehabilitation2013; 33: 555–563.
7.
JacksonKEdginton-BigelowKCooperCMerrimanHA. Group kickboxing program for balance, mobility, and quality of life in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther2012; 36: 131–137.
8.
KalronAPasitselskyDGreenberg-AbrahamiMAchironA. Do textured insoles effect postural control and spatiotemporal parameters of gait and plantar sensation in people with multiple sclerosis?PM R2015; 7:17–25.
9.
BayraktarDGuclu-GunduzAYaziciG. Effects of Ai-Chi on balance, functional mobility, strength and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation2013; 33: 431–437.
10.
NilsagårdYEForsbergASvon KochL. Balance exercise for persons with multiple sclerosis using Wii games: a randomised, controlled multi-centre study. Mult Scler2013; 19: 209–216.
11.
RombergAVirtanenARuutiainenJ. Effects of a 6-month exercise program on patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized study. Neurology2004; 63: 2034–2038.
12.
LordSWadeDHalliganP. A comparison of two physiotherapy treatment approaches to improve walking in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil1998; 12: 477–486.
13.
WilesCNewcombeRFullerK. Controlled randomised crossover trial of the effects of physiotherapy on mobility in chronic multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2001; 70: 174–179.
14.
KilberWBPressJSciasciaA. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med2006; 36: 189–198.
15.
SheaSMorielloG. Feasibility and outcomes of a classical Pilates program on lower extremity, posture, balance, gait, and quality of life in someone with impairments due to a stroke. J Bodyw Mov Ther2014; 18: 332–360.
16.
HyunJHwangboKLeeCW. The effects of Pilates mat exercise on the balance ability of elderly females. J Phys Ther Sci2014; 26: 291–293.
17.
FreemanJGearMPauliA. The effect of core stability training on balance and mobility in ambulant individuals with multiple sclerosis: A multicenter series of single case studies. Mult Scler2010; 16: 1377–1384.
18.
Guclu-GundazACitakerSIrkecCNazlielBBatur-CaglayanHZ. The effects of pilates on balance, mobility and strength in patients with multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation2014; 34: 337–342.
19.
MarandiSMNejadVSShanazariZZolaktafV. A comparison of 12 weeks of pilates and aquatic training on the dynamic balance of women with multiple sclerosis. Int J Prev Med2013; 4: S110–S117.
20.
van der LindenMLBulleyCGeneenLJHooperJECowanPMercerTH. Pilates for people with multiple sclerosis who use a wheelchair: feasibility, efficacy and participant experiences. Disabil Rehabil2014; 36: 932–939.
21.
ChanLHeinemannAWRobertsJ. Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2014; 57: 558–560
22.
PolmanCHReingoldSCBanwellB. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol2011; 69: 292–302.
23.
KurtzkeJF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology1983; 33: 1444–1452.
24.
FreemanJFoxEGearMHoughA. Pilates based core stability training in ambulant individuals with multiple sclerosis: protocol for a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurology2012; 12: 19.
25.
NilsagardYLundholmCGunnarssonLGDenisonE. Clinical relevance using timed walk tests and ‘timed up and go’ testing in persons with multiple sclerosis. Physiother Res Int2007; 12: 105–114.
26.
BaertIFreemanJSmedalT. Responsiveness and clinically meaningful improvement, according to disability level, of walking measures after rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a European multi-center study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2014, 28: 621–631.
27.
DuncanPWWienerDKChandlerJStudenskiS. Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol1990; 45: 192–197.
28.
BlumLKorner-BitenskyN. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys.Ther2008; 88: 559–566.
29.
WagnerJMNorrisRAVan DillenLRThomasFPNaismithRT. Four square step test in ambulant persons with multiple sclerosis: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Int J Rehabil Res2013; 36: 253–259.
30.
HobartJCRiaziALampingDLFitzpatrickRThompsonAJ. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: the 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology2003; 60: 31–36.
31.
KosDKerckhofsECarreaIVerzaRRamosMJansaJ. Evaluation of the Modified Fatique Impact Scale in four different European countries. Multiple Sclerosis2005; 11: 76–80.
32.
KalronADvirZFridLAchironA. Quantifying gait impairment using an instrumented treadmill in people with multiple sclerosis. ISRN Neurol2013; 2013: 867575.
33.
JohnsonLPutrinoDJamesI. The effects of a supervised Pilates training program on balance in Parkinson’s disease. Adv Park Dis2013; 2: 58–61.
34.
BulloVBergaminMGobboSSieverdesJCZaccariaMNeunhaeusererDErmolaoA. The effects of Pilates exercise training on physical fitness and wellbeing in the elderly: A systematic review for future exercise prescription. Preventive Medicine2015; 75:1–11.
35.
BarkerALBirdMLTalevskiJ. Effect of Pilates exercise for improving balance in older adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation2015; 96: 715–723.
36.
SuhYWeikertMDlugonskiDBalantrapuSMotlRW. Social conitive variables as correlates of physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis: findings from a longitudinal, observational study. Behav Med2011; 37: 87–94.
