Early or delayed provision of an ankle-foot orthosis in patients with acute and subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective:

(1) To study the effects of providing ankle-foot orthoses in subjects with (sub)acute stroke; and (2) to study whether the point in time at which an ankle-foot orthosis is provided post-stroke (early or delayed) influences these effects.

Design:

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting:

Rehabilitation centre.

Subjects:

Unilateral hemiparetic stroke subjects with indication for use of an ankle-foot orthosis and maximal six weeks post-stroke.

Interventions:

Subjects were randomly assigned to: early provision (at inclusion; Week 1) or delayed provision (eight weeks later; Week 9).

Outcome measures:

10-metre walk test, 6-minute walk test, Timed Up and Go Test, stairs test, Functional Ambulation Categories, Berg Balance Scale, Rivermead Mobility Index and Barthel Index; assessed in Weeks 1, 3, 9 and 11.

Results:

A total of 33 subjects were randomized (16 early, 17 delayed). Positive effects of ankle-foot orthoses were found two weeks after provision, both when provided early (significant effects on all outcomes) or delayed (Berg Balance Scale p = 0.011, Functional Ambulation Categories p = 0.008, 6-minute walk test p = 0.005, Timed Up and Go Test p = 0.028). Comparing effects after early and delayed provision showed that early provision resulted in increased levels of improvement on Berg Balance Scale (+5.1 points, p = 0.002), Barthel Index (+1.9 points, p = 0.002) and non-significant improvements on 10-metre walk test (+0.14 m/s, p = 0.093) and Timed Up and Go Test (–5.4 seconds, p = 0.087), compared with delayed provision.

Conclusions:

We found positive effects of providing ankle-foot orthoses in (sub)acute stroke subjects that had not used these orthoses before.

Keywords

Ankle-foot orthosis stroke rehabilitation functional outcome timing of provision randomized controlled trial

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Leung

Mosely

. Impact of ankle-foot orthoses on gait and leg muscle activity in adults with hemiplegia. Physiother 2003; 89: 39–55.

Chen

C-L

Yeung

K-T

Wang

C-H

Chu

H-T

Yeh

C-Y

. Anterior ankle-foot orthosis effects on postural stability in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1587–1592.

Tyson

Thornton

. The effect of a hinged ankle foot orthosis on hemiplegic gait: Objective measures and users’ opinions. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 53–58.

Corcoran

Jebsen

Brengelmann

Simons

. Effects of plastic and metal leg braces on speed and energy cost of hemiparetic ambulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 69–77.

de Wit

Buurke

Nijlant

IJzerman

Hermens

. The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 550–557.

Simons

van Asseldonk

van der Kooij

Geurts

Buurke

. Ankle-foot orthoses in stroke: Effects on functional balance, weight-bearing asymmetry and the contribution of each lower limb to balance control. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2009; 24: 769–775.

Franceschini

Massucci

Ferrari

Agosti

Paroli

. Effects of an ankle-foot orthosis on spatiotemporal parameters and energy cost of hemiparetic gait. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 368–372.

Stinear

Ackerley

Byblow

. Rehabilitation is initiated early after stroke, but most motor rehabilitation trials are not: A systematic review. Stroke 2013; 44: 2039–2045.

Tyson

Kent

. Effects of an ankle-foot orthosis on balance and walking after stroke: A systematic review and pooled meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94: 1377–1385.

10.

Tyson

Rogerson

. Assistive walking devices in nonambulant patients undergoing rehabilitation after stroke: The effects on functional mobility, walking impairments, and patients’ opinion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 475–479.

11.

Pomeroy

Rowe

Clark

, et al. A randomized controlled evaluation of the efficacy of an ankle-foot cast on walking recovery early after stroke: SWIFT cast trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016; 30: 40–48.

12.

de Sèze

Bonhomme

Daviet

, et al. Effect of early compensation of distal motor defiencey by the Chignon ankle-foot orthosis on gait in hemiplegic patients: A randomized pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2011; 25: 989–998.

13.

Holden

Gill

Magliozzi

Nathan

Piehl-Baker

. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984; 64: 35–40.

14.

van Peppen

RPS

Kwakkel

Harmeling-van der Wel

, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline in Physiotherapy-management of patients with Stroke (in Dutch: KNGF-richtlijn Beroerte). Ned Tijdschr v Fysioth 2004; 114: 1–78.

15.

Gage

. Gait analysis. An essential tool in the treatment of cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 288: 126–134.

16.

Folstein

McHugh

. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–198.

17.

Stolk-Hornsveld

Crow

Hendriks

van der Baan

Harmeling-van der Wel

. The Erasmus MC modifications to the (revised) Nottingham Sensory Assessment: A reliable somatosensory assessment measure for patients with intracranial disorders. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 160–172.

18.

Collin

Wade

. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: A pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53: 576–579.

19.

Wade

. Measurements in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

20.

Berg

Wood-Dauphinee

Williams

Gayton

. Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 1989; 41: 304–311.

21.

Eng

Chu

Dawson

Kim

Hepburn

. Functional walk tests in individuals with stroke: Relation to perceived exertion and myocardial exertion. Stroke 2002; 33: 756–761.

22.

Podsiadlo

Richardson

. The timed “Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142–148.

23.

Collen

Wade

Robb

Bradshaw

. The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991; 13: 50–54.

24.

Collin

Wade

Davies

Horne

. The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61–63.

25.

Perera

Mody

Woodman

Studenski

. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54: 743–749.

26.

Tilson

Sullivan

Cen

, et al. Meaningful gait speed improvement during the first 60 days poststroke: Minimal clinically important difference. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 196–208.

27.

Perry

Garrett

Gronley

Mulroy

. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995; 26: 982–989.

28.

Kwakkel

Kollen

Twisk

. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 2348–2353.

29.

Liaw

Hsieh

Chen

Lee

Lin

. The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30: 656–661.

30.

Stevenson

. Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale. Aust J Physiother 2001; 47: 29–38.

31.

Wang

Yen

Lee

Lin

Wang

Yang

. Effects of an ankle-foot orthosis on balance performance in patients with hemiparesis of different durations. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 37–44.

32.

Mao

Hsueh

Tang

Sheu

Hsieh

. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke 2002; 33: 1022–1027.

33.

Hsieh

Wang

Chen

Sheu

Hsieh

. Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 233–238.

34.

Lairamore

Garrison

Bandy

Zabel

. Comparison of tibialis anterior muscle electromyography, ankle angle, and velocity when individuals post stroke walk with different orthoses. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011; 35: 402–410.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.38 MB