The objectives were to provide an estimate of expected enrolment and attrition rates based on published studies of existing self-management interventions for people with multiple sclerosis, and to identify contributing factors and impact on outcomes.
Review methods:
A systematic literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, OT Seeker, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases. Controlled trials with or without randomization using either a between-group or within-person design were included if they met specified criteria. A random-effect meta-regression analysis was conducted to estimate the overall enrolment and attrition proportions, effect of person- and study-related factors, and impact on outcomes.
Results:
A total of 48 studies, comprising 4446 persons were identified. The estimated enrolment rate was 50.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49.6 to 51.1) and the estimated attrition rates in the intervention and control groups were 16.8% (95% CI: 16.2 to 17.3) and 14.4% (95% CI: 13.8 to 14.9), respectively. The main reported reason for refusing to participate was lack of interest (70.6%), while the reported reasons for dropping out were mainly owing to medical issues (26.1%) and disliking the intervention (17.9%). Trial, programme, and patient-related variables were found to influence the enrolment and/or attrition rates. Studies that had a 10% higher attrition rate had an effect size that was larger by 0.19 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.24).
Conclusion:
Greater understanding of the factors associated with enrolment and attrition rates would help in planning and developing a more appealing self-management intervention that patients can easily accept and incorporate into their everyday lives.
GiovannoniGRhoadesRW. Individualizing treatment goals and interventions for people with MS. Curr Opin Neurol2012; 25: S20–27.
2.
BarlowJWrightCSheasbyJTurnerAHainsworthJ. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: A review. Patient Educ Couns2002; 48(2): 177–187.
3.
KuspinarARodriguezAMMayoNE. The effects of clinical interventions on health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis. Mult Scler2012; 18(12): 1686–1704.
4.
PlowMAFinlaysonMRezacM. A scoping review of self-management interventions for adults with multiple sclerosis. PM&R2011; 3(3): 251–262.
5.
Rae-GrantADTurnerAPSloanAMillerDHunzikerJHaselkornJK. Self-management in neurological disorders: Systematic review of the literature and potential interventions in multiple sclerosis care. J Rehabil Res Dev2011; 48(9): 1087–1100.
6.
PigottTD. Missing predictors in models of effect size. Eval Health Prof2001; 24(3): 277–307.
7.
MenzinJCaonCNicholsCWhiteLAFriedmanMPillMW. Narrative review of the literature on adherence to disease-modifying therapies among patients with multiple sclerosis. J Manag Care Pharm2013; 19(1 Supp A): S24–S40.
8.
PattiF. Optimizing the benefit of multiple sclerosis therapy: The importance of treatment adherence. Patient Prefer Adherence2010; 4: 1–9.
9.
AsanoMDawesDJArafahAMorielloCMayoNE. What does a structured review of the effectiveness of exercise interventions for persons with multiple sclerosis tell us about the challenges of designing trials?Mult Scler2009; 15(4): 412–421.
10.
PloughmanMAustinMWMurdochM, et al. Factors influencing healthy aging with multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil2012; 34(1): 26–33.
11.
MalcomsonKSLowe-StrongASDunwoodyL. What can we learn from the personal insights of individuals living and coping with multiple sclerosis?Disabil Rehabil2008; 30(9): 662–674.
12.
WittesJ. Missing inaction: Preventing missing outcome data in randomized clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat2009; 19(6): 957–968.
13.
HigginsJPDeeksJJ. Selecting studies and collecting data. In: HigginsJPGreenS (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2008, pp.151–185.
14.
LorigKRHolmanHR. Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med2003; 26(1): 1–7.
15.
PlowMAFinlaysonMRezacM. A scoping review of self-management interventions for adults with multiple sclerosis. PM&R2011; 3(3): 251–262.
16.
O’ConnorDGreenSHigginsJP. Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. In: HigginsJPGreenS (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2008, pp.83–94.
17.
RenesesBMunozELopez-IborJJ. Factors predicting drop-out in community mental health centres. World Psychiatry2009; 8(3): 173–177.
18.
ColomboOFerrettiVVFerrarisC, et al. Is drop-out from obesity treatment a predictable and preventable event?Nutr J2014; 13: 13.
19.
GroeneveldIFProperKIvan der BeekAJHildebrandtVHvan MechelenW. Factors associated with non-participation and drop-out in a lifestyle intervention for workers with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2009; 6: 80.
20.
SchindlerAHillerWWitthoftM. What predicts outcome, response, and drop-out in CBT of depressive adults? A naturalistic study. Behav Cogn Psychother2013; 41(3): 365–370.
21.
WellsAAPalinkasLAQiuXEllK. Cancer patients’ perspectives on discontinuing depression treatment: the “drop out” phenomenon. Patient Pref Adher2011; 5: 465–470.
22.
MaidaSDalla CostaGRodegherMFalautanoMComiGMartinelliV. Overcoming recruitment challenges in patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from an Italian survey. Clinical trials (London, England), 2014; 11(6): 667–672.
23.
TabachnickBGFidellLS. Using multivariate statistics, 6th edition.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2012.
24.
EggerMSmithGDAltmanDG. Systematic reviews in health care. Meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2007.
25.
DongYPengCY. Principled missing data methods for researchers. Springerplus2013; 2(1): 222.
26.
SchaferJL. Multiple imputation: A primer. Stat Methods in Med1999; 8(1): 3–15.
27.
SchwartzCE. Teaching coping skills enhances quality of life more than peer support: Results of a randomized trial with multiple sclerosis patients. Health Psychol1999; 18(3): 211–220.
28.
MohrDCLikoskyWBertagnolliA, et al. Telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy for the treatment of depressive symptoms in multiple sclerosis. J Consult Clin Psychol2000; 68(2): 356–361.
29.
O’HaraLCadburyHDeSLIdeL. Evaluation of the effectiveness of professionally guided self-care for people with multiple sclerosis living in the community: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2002; 16(2): 119–128.
30.
EgnerAPhillipsVLVoraRWiggersE. Depression, fatigue, and health-related quality of life among people with advanced multiple sclerosis: Results from an exploratory telerehabilitation study. Neurorehabil2003; 18(2): 125–133.
31.
StuifbergenABeckerHBlozisSTimmermanGKullbergV. A randomized clinical trial of a wellness intervention for women with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003; 84(4): 467–476.
32.
WassemRDudleyW. Symptom management and adjustment of patients with multiple sclerosis: A 4-year longitudinal intervention study. Clin Nurs Res2003; 12(1): 102–117.
33.
MathiowetzVGFinlaysonMLMatuskaKMChenHYLuoP. Randomized controlled trial of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2005; 11(5): 592–601.
34.
MohrDCHartSLJulianL, et al. Telephone-administered psychotherapy for depression. Arch Gen Psychiat2005; 62(9): 1007–1014.
35.
EnnisMThainJBoggildMBakerGAYoungCA. A randomized controlled trial of a health promotion education programme for people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil. 2006; 20(9): 783–792.
36.
EakinEGBullSSRileyKMReevesMMMcLaughlinPGutierrezS. Resources for health: A primary-care-based diet and physical activity intervention targeting urban latinos with multiple chronic conditions. Health Psychol2007; 26(4): 392–400.
37.
KosDDuportailMD’hoogheMBNagelsGKerckhofsE. Multidisciplinary fatigue management programme in multiple sclerosis: A randomized clinical trial. Mult Scler2007; 13(8): 996–1003.
38.
McAuleyEMotlRWMorrisKS, et al. Enhancing physical activity adherence and well-being in multiple sclerosis: A randomised controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2007; 13(5): 652–659.
39.
BombardierCHCunniffeMWadhwaniRGibbonsLEBlakeKDKraftGH. The efficacy of telephone counseling for health promotion in people with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2008; 89(10): 1849–1856.
40.
KasperJKopkeSMuhlhauserINublingMHeesenC. Informed shared decision making about immunotherapy for patients with multiple sclerosis (ISDIMS): A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Neurol2008; 15(12): 1345–1352.
41.
RigbySAThorntonEWYoungCA. A randomized group intervention trial to enhance mood and self-efficacy in people with multiple sclerosis. Br J Health Psychol2008; 13(4): 4–31.
42.
Van KesselKMoss-MorrisRWilloughbyEChalderTJohnsonMHRobinsonE. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavior therapy for multiple sclerosis fatigue. Psychos Med2008; 70(2): 205–213.
43.
BarlowJTurnerAEdwardsRGilchristM. A randomised controlled trial of lay-led self-management for people with multiple sclerosis. Patient Educat Counsel2009; (1): 81–89.
44.
KopkeSKasperJMuhlhauserINublingMHeesenC. Patient education program to enhance decision autonomy in multiple sclerosis relapse management: A randomized-controlled trial. Mult Scler2009; 15(1): 96–104.
45.
GhahariSLeighPTPassmoreAE. Effectiveness of an online fatigue self-management programme for people with chronic neurological conditions: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2010; 24(8): 727–744.
46.
HugosCLCoppermanLFFullerBEYadavVLoveraJBourdetteDN. Clinical trial of a formal group fatigue program in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2010; 16(6): 724–732.
47.
SolariAMartinelliVTrojanoM, et al. An information aid for newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients improves disease knowledge and satisfaction with care. Mult Scler2010; 16(11): 1393–1405.
48.
FinlaysonMPreissnerKChoCPlowM. Randomized trial of a teleconference-delivered fatigue management program for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2011; 17(9): 1130–1140.
49.
MillerDMMooreSMFoxRJ, et al. Web-based self-management for patients with multiple sclerosis: A practical, randomized trial. Telemed J e-Health2011; 17(1): 2011–2012.
50.
ArtemiadisAKVervainiotiAAAlexopoulosECRombosAAnagnostouliMCDarviriC. Stress management and multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2012; 27(4): 406–416.
51.
Moss-MorrisRMcCronePYardleyLvan KesselKWillsGDennisonL. A pilot randomised controlled trial of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy self-management programme (MS Invigor8) for multiple sclerosis fatigue. Behav Res Ther2012; 50(6): 415–421.
52.
ThomasSThomasPWKerstenP, et al. A pragmatic parallel arm multi-centre randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based fatigue management programme (FACETS) for people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych2013; 84(10): 1092–1099.
53.
KopkeSKernSZiemssenT, et al. Evidence-based patient information programme in early multiple sclerosis: A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych2014; 85(4): 411–418.
54.
PlowMBethouxFMcDanielCMcGlynnMMarcusB. Randomized controlled pilot study of customized pamphlets to promote physical activity and symptom self-management in women with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil2014; 28(2): 139–148.
55.
SandroffBMKlarenREPiluttiLADlugonskiDBenedictRHBMotlRW. Randomized controlled trial of physical activity, cognition, and walking in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol2014; 261(2): 363–372.
56.
TurnerAPSloanAPKivlahanDRHaselkornJK. Telephone counseling and home telehealth monitoring to improve medication adherence: Results of a pilot trial among individuals with multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol2014; (2): 136–146.
57.
EhdeDMElzeaJLVerrallAMGibbonsLESmithAEAmtmannD. Efficacy of a telephone-delivered self-management intervention for persons with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial with a one-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96(11): 1945–1958.e2.
58.
van KesselKWouldesTMoss-MorrisR. A New Zealand pilot randomized controlled trial of a web-based interactive self-management programme (MSInvigor8) with and without email support for the treatment of multiple sclerosis fatigue. Clin Rehabil2016; 30(5): 454–462.
59.
TesarNBaumhacklUKoppMGuntherV. Effects of psychological group therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand2003; 107(6): 394–399.
60.
VanageSMGilbertsonKKMathiowetzV. Effects of an energy conservation course on fatigue impact for persons with progressive multiple sclerosis. Am J Occupat Ther2003; (3): 315–323.
61.
PattenSBNewmanSBeckerMRiddellCMetzL. Disease management for depression in an MS clinic. Int J Psych Med2007; 37(4): 459–473.
62.
BoeschotenRENieuwenhuisMMvanOP, et al. Feasibility and outcome of a web-based self-help intervention for depressive symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. J Neurol Sci2012; 315(1–2): 104–109.
63.
FeickeJSporhaseUKohlerJBuschCWirtzM. A multicenter, prospective, quasi-experimental evaluation study of a patient education program to foster multiple sclerosis self-management competencies. Patient Educat Counsel2014; 97(3): 361–369.
64.
GiordanoALugaresiAConfalonieriP, et al. Implementation of the ‘Sapere Migliora’ information aid for newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis in routine clinical practice: A late-phase controlled trial. Mult Scler2014; 20(9): 1234–1243.
65.
FoleyFWLaRoccaNGSandersASZemonV. Rehabilitation of intimacy and sexual dysfunction in couples with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2001; 7(6): 417–421.
66.
MathiowetzVMatuskaKMMurphyME. Efficacy of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82(4): 449–456.
67.
FinlaysonM. Pilot study of an energy conservation education program delivered by telephone conference call to people with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil2005; 20(4): 267–277.
68.
NavipourHMadaniHMohebbiMRNavipourRRoozbayaniPPaydarA. Improved fatigue in individuals with multiple sclerosis after participating in a short-term self-care programme. Neurorehabil2006; 21(1): 37–41.
69.
SauterCZebenholzerKHisakawaJZeitlhoferJVassK. A longitudinal study on effects of a six-week course for energy conservation for multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler2008; 14(4): 500–505.
70.
FinlaysonMPetersonEWChoC. Pilot study of a fall risk management program for middle aged and older adults with MS. Neurorehabil2009; 25(2): 107–115.
71.
HartleyS. Developing a self-management and exercise model for people with multiple sclerosis. Including commentary by Plummer-D’Amato P and Giesser B. Int J Ther Rehabil2009; 16(1): 34–42.
72.
ShevilEFinlaysonM. Pilot study of a cognitive intervention program for persons with multiple sclerosis. Health Ed Res2010; (1): 41–53.
73.
SahebalzamaniMZamiriMRashvandF. The effects of self-care training on quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis. Iranian J Nurs Midwif Res2012; 17(1): 7–11.
74.
KerstenSMahliMDrosselmeyerJ, et al. A pilot study of an exercise-based patient education program in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Int2014: 306878.
75.
ReadeJWWhiteMBWhiteCPRussellCS. What would you say? Expressing the difficulties of living with multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs2012; 44(1): 54–63.
76.
KaplanRMAtkinsCJ. Selective attrition causes overestimates of treatment effects in studies of weight loss. Addictive Behaviors1987; 12(3): 297–302.
77.
MelvilleKMCaseyLMKavanaghDJ. Dropout from Internet-based treatment for psychological disorders. Br J Clin Psychol. 2010; 49((Pt 4)): 455–471.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
