To summarize evidence on the effectiveness of virtual reality games and conventional therapy or no-intervention for fall prevention in the elderly.
Data sources:
An electronic data search (last searched December 2016) was performed on 10 databases (Web of Science, EMBASE, PUBMED, CINAHL, LILACS, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, Scopus, SciELO, PEDro) and retained only randomized controlled trials.
Review method:
Sample characteristics and intervention parameters were compared, focusing on clinical homogeneity of demographic characteristics, type/duration of interventions, outcomes (balance, reaction time, mobility, lower limb strength and fear of falling) and low risk of bias. Based on homogeneity, a meta-analysis was considered. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias.
Results:
A total of 28 studies met the inclusion criteria and were appraised (n: 1121 elderly participants). We found that virtual reality games presented positive effects on balance and fear of falling compared with no-intervention. Virtual reality games were also superior to conventional interventions for balance improvements and fear of falling. The six studies included in the meta-analysis demonstrated that virtual reality games significantly improved mobility and balance after 3–6 and 8–12 weeks of intervention when compared with no-intervention. The risk of bias revealed that less than one-third of the studies correctly described the random sequence generation and allocation concealment procedures.
Conclusion:
Our review suggests positive clinical effects of virtual reality games for balance and mobility improvements compared with no-treatment and conventional interventions. However, owing to the high risk of bias and large variability of intervention protocols, the evidence remains inconclusive and further research is warranted.
ShubertTE. Evidence-based exercise prescription for balance and falls prevention: A current review of the literature. J Geriatr Phys Ther2011; 34: 100–108.
2.
O’LoughlinJLRobitailleYBoivinJ-FSuissaS. Incidence of and risk factors for falls and injurious falls among the community-dwelling elderly. Am J Epidemiol1993; 137: 342–354.
3.
TrompASmitJDeegDBouterLLipsP. Predictors for falls and fractures in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. J Bone Miner Res1998; 13: 1932–1939.
4.
NevittMCCummingsSRHudesES. Risk factors for injurious falls: A prospective study. J Gerontol1991; 46: M164–M170.
5.
FullerGF. Falls in the elderly. Am Fam Physician2000; 61: 2159–2168.
6.
GillespieLDRobertsonMCGillespieWJet al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2012; 9: CD007146.
7.
FitzgeraldDTrakarnratanakulNSmythBCaulfieldB. Effects of a wobble board-based therapeutic exergaming system for balance training on dynamic postural stability and intrinsic motivation levels. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2010; 40: 11–19.
8.
WarburtonDEBredinSSHoritaLTet al. The health benefits of interactive video game exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab2007; 32: 655–663.
9.
Van DiestMLamothCJStegengaJVerkerkeGJPostemaK. Exergaming for balance training of elderly: State of the art and future developments. J Neuroeng Rehabil2013; 10: 101.
10.
NikolausTBachM. Preventing falls in community-dwelling frail older people using a home intervention team (HIT): Results from the randomized falls-HIT trial. J Am Geriatr Soc2003; 51: 300–305.
11.
CampbellAJRobertsonMCLa GrowSJet al. Randomised controlled trial of prevention of falls in people aged > or =75 with severe visual impairment: The VIP trial. BMJ2005; 331: 817.
12.
LangeBSRequejoPFlynnSMet al. The potential of virtual reality and gaming to assist successful aging with disability. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am2010; 21:339–356.
13.
LevinMF. Can virtual reality offer enriched environments for rehabilitation?Expert Rev Neurother2011; 11: 153–155.
14.
LamothCJAlinghRCaljouwSR. Exergaming for elderly: Effects of different types of game feedback on performance of a balance task. Stud Health Technol Inform2012; 181: 103–107.
15.
de BruinEDSchoeneDPichierriGSmithST. Use of virtual reality technique for the training of motor control in the elderly. Some theoretical considerations. Z Gerontol Geriatr2010; 43: 229–234.
16.
MolinaKIRicciNAde MoraesSAPerraciniMR. Virtual reality using games for improving physical functioning in older adults: A systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil2014; 11: 156.
17.
MillerKJAdairBSPearceAJSaidCMOzanneEMorrisMM. Effectiveness and feasibility of virtual reality and gaming system use at home by older adults for enabling physical activity to improve health-related domains: A systematic review. Age Ageing2014; 43: 188–195.
18.
PietrzakECoteaCPullmanS. Using commercial video games for falls prevention in older adults: The way for the future?J Geriatr Phys Ther2014; 37: 166–177.
19.
KnoblochKYoonUVogtPM. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. J Craniomaxillofac Surg2011; 39: 91–92.
20.
HuangXLinJDemner-FushmanD. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, American Medical Informatics Association, 2006, p.359.
21.
HigginsJPTGreenS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
22.
Armijo-OlivoSOspinaMda CostaBRet al. Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials. PloS One2014; 9: e96920.
23.
WrightCCSimJ. Intention-to-treat approach to data from randomized controlled trials: A sensitivity analysis. J Clin Epidemiol2003; 56: 833–842.
24.
ChoGHHwangboGShinHS. The effects of virtual reality-based balance training on balance of the elderly. J Phys Ther Sci2014; 26: 615–617.
25.
HsiehW-MChenC-CWangS-Cet al. Virtual reality system based on Kinect for the elderly in fall prevention. Technol Health Care2014; 22: 27–36.
26.
MaillotPPerrotAHartleyA. The braking force in walking: Age-related differences and improvement in older adults with exergame training. J Aging Phys Act2014; 22: 518–526.
27.
BierylaKADoldNM. Feasibility of Wii Fit training to improve clinical measures of balance in older adults. Clin Interv Aging2013; 8: 775–781.
28.
LaiC-HPengC-WChenY-LHuangC-PHsiaoY-LChenS-C. Effects of interactive video-game based system exercise on the balance of the elderly. Gait Posture2013; 37: 511–515.
29.
SchoeneDLordSRDelbaereKSeverinoCDaviesTASmithST. A randomized controlled pilot study of home-based step training in older people using videogame technology. PloS One2013; 8: e57734.
30.
KubickiAPetrementGBonnetblancFBallayYMoureyF. Practice-related improvements in postural control during rapid arm movement in older adults: A preliminary study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci2011; 67: 196–203.
31.
MaillotPPerrotAHartleyA. Effects of interactive physical-activity video-game training on physical and cognitive function in older adults. Psychol Aging2012; 27: 589–600.
32.
RendonAALohmanEBThorpeDJohnsonEGMedinaEBradleyB. The effect of virtual reality gaming on dynamic balance in older adults. Age Ageing2012; 41: 549–552.
33.
GschwindYJEichbergSEjupiAet al. ICT-based system to predict and prevent falls (iStoppFalls): Results from an international multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act2015; 12: 10.
34.
GschwindYJSchoeneDLordSRet al. The effect of sensor-based exercise at home on functional performance associated with fall risk in older people – a comparison of two exergame interventions. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act2015; 12: 11.
35.
SchoeneDValenzuelaTTosonBet al. Interactive cognitive-motor step training improves cognitive risk factors of falling in older adults – a randomized controlled trial. PloS One2015; 10: e0145161.
36.
SinghDKRajaratnamBSPalaniswamyVPearsonHRamanVPBongPS. Participating in a virtual reality balance exercise program can reduce risk and fear of falls. Maturitas2012; 73: 239–243.
37.
DuqueGBoersmaDLoza-DiazGet al. Effects of balance training using a virtual-reality system in older fallers. Clin Interv Aging2013; 8: 257–263.
38.
DanielK. Wii-hab for pre-frail older adults. Rehabil Nurs2012; 37: 195–201.
39.
FrancoJRJacobsKInzerilloCKluzikJ. The effect of the Nintendo Wii Fit and exercise in improving balance and quality of life in community dwelling elders. Technol Health Care2012; 20: 95–115.
40.
PichierriGMurerKde BruinED. A cognitive-motor intervention using a dance video game to enhance foot placement accuracy and gait under dual task conditions in older adults: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr2012; 12: 74.
41.
PichierriGCoppeALorenzettiSMurerKde BruinED. The effect of a cognitive-motor intervention on voluntary step execution under single and dual task conditions in older adults: A randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Interv Aging2012; 7: 175–184.
42.
PluchinoALeeSYAsfourSRoosBASignorileJF. Pilot study comparing changes in postural control after training using a video game balance board program and 2 standard activity-based balance intervention programs. Arch Phys Med Rehab2012; 93: 1138–1146.
43.
SinghDRajaratnamBPalaniswamyVRamanVBongPPearsonH. Effects of balance-focused interactive games compared to therapeutic balance classes for older women. Climacteric2013; 16: 141–146.
44.
ToulotteCTourselCOlivierN. Wii Fit® training vs. adapted physical activities: Which one is the most appropriate to improve the balance of independent senior subjects? A randomized controlled study. Clin Rehab2012; 26: 827–835.
45.
SzturmTBetkerALMoussaviZDesaiAGoodmanV. Effects of an interactive computer game exercise regimen on balance impairment in frail community-dwelling older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther2011; 91: 1449–1462.
46.
JorgensenMGLaessoeUHendriksenCNielsenOBFAagaardP. Efficacy of Nintendo Wii training on mechanical leg muscle function and postural balance in community-dwelling older adults: A randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci2012; 68: 845–852.
47.
LeeW-HChoK-HKimS-HLeeJ-H. The effect of a virtual reality-based exercise program using a video game on the balance, gait and fall prevention in the elderly women. J Sport Leis Studies2011; 44: 605–614.
48.
FuASGaoKLTungAKTsangWWKwanMM. Effectiveness of exergaming training in reducing risk and incidence of falls in frail older adults with a history of falls. Arch Phys Med Rehab2015; 96: 2096–2102.
49.
KwokBCPuaYH. Effects of WiiActive exercises on fear of falling and functional outcomes in community-dwelling older adults: A randomised control trial. Age Ageing2016; 45: 621–627.
50.
ParkJYimJ. A new approach to improve cognition, muscle strength, and postural balance in community-dwelling elderly with a 3-D virtual reality kayak program. Tohoku J Exp Med2016; 238: 1–8.
51.
YeşilyaprakSSYıldırımMŞTomrukMErtekinÖAlgunZC. Comparison of the effects of virtual reality-based balance exercises and conventional exercises on balance and fall risk in older adults living in nursing homes in Turkey. Physiother Theory Pract2016; 32: 191–201.
52.
KueiderAMParisiJMGrossALRebokGW. Computerized cognitive training with older adults: A systematic review. PloS One2012; 7: e40588.
53.
SherringtonCWhitneyJCLordSRHerbertRDCummingRGCloseJC. Effective exercise for the prevention of falls: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc2008; 56: 2234–2243.
54.
NICE. NICE clinical guideline 161. Falls: Assessment and prevention of falls in older people. In: NICE (ed.). London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2013, p.315.
55.
KennyRARubensteinLZTinettiMEet al. Summary of the updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc2011; 59: 148–157.
56.
MoyerVA. Prevention of falls in community-dwelling older adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med2012; 157: 197–204.
57.
KojimaGMasudTKendrickDet al. Does the timed up and go test predict future falls among British community-dwelling older people? Prospective cohort study nested within a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr2015; 15: 38.
58.
LinMRHwangHFHuMHWuHDWangYWHuangFC. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc2004; 52: 1343–1348.
59.
ShimadaHSuzukawaMTiedemannAKobayashiKYoshidaHSuzukiT. Which neuromuscular or cognitive test is the optimal screening tool to predict falls in frail community-dwelling older people?Gerontology2009; 55: 532–538.
60.
Shumway-CookABrauerSWoollacottM. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther2000; 80: 896–903.
61.
LajoieYGallagherSP. Predicting falls within the elderly community: comparison of postural sway, reaction time, the Berg Balance Scale and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale for comparing fallers and non-fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr2004; 38: 11–26.
62.
LajoieYGirardAGuayM. Comparison of the reaction time, the Berg Scale and the ABC in non-fallers and fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr2002; 35: 215–225.
63.
DonoghueD. How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people. J Rehab Med2009; 41: 343–346.
64.
ChouCHHwangCLWuYT. Effect of exercise on physical function, daily living activities, and quality of life in the frail older adults: A meta-analysisArch Phys Med Rehab2012; 93: 237–244.
65.
HuttonLFrameRMaggoHet al. The perceptions of physical activity in an elderly population at risk of falling: A focus group study. N Z J Physiother2009; 37: 85–92.
66.
GluudLL. Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol2006; 163: 493–501.
67.
JüniPAltmanDGEggerM. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ2001; 323: 42–46.
68.
SchulzKFGrimesDA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: Chance, not choice. Lancet2002; 359: 515–519.
69.
AltmanD. Randomisation. Essential for reducing bias. BMJ1991; 302: 1481–1482.
70.
SchulzKFChalmersIHayesRJAltmanDG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA1995; 273: 408–412.
71.
SchulzKFGrimesDA. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: Defending against deciphering. Lancet2002; 359: 614–618.
72.
MoherDPhamBJonesAet al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Lancet1998; 352: 609–613.
73.
NüeschEReichenbachSTrelleSet al. The importance of allocation concealment and patient blinding in osteoarthritis trials: A meta-epidemiologic study. Arthritis Rheum2009; 61: 1633–1641.
74.
PsatyBMPrenticeRL. Minimizing bias in randomized trials: The importance of blinding. JAMA2010; 304: 793–794.
75.
NüeschETrelleSReichenbachSet al. The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: Meta-epidemiological study. BMJ2009; 339: b3244.
76.
TierneyJFStewartLA. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol2005; 34: 79–87.
77.
Armijo-OlivoSWarrenSMageeD. Intention to treat analysis, compliance, drop-outs and how to deal with missing data in clinical research: A review. Phys Ther Rev2009; 14: 36–49.
78.
WalkerMShaperAG. Follow-up of subjects in prospective studies based in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract1984; 34: 365–370.
79.
WoolardRHCartyKPhilipWirtzet al. Research fundamentals. Follow-up of subjects in clinical trials: Addressing subject attrition. Acad Emerg Med2004; 11: 859–866.
80.
YordanovYDechartresAPorcherRBoutronIAltmanDGRavaudP. Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials. BMJ2015; 350: h809.
81.
Armijo-OlivoSda CostaBRCummingsGGet al. PEDro or Cochrane to assess the quality of clinical trials? A meta-epidemiological study. PloS One2015; 10: e0132634.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
