Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled feasibility trial comparing treatment session numbers

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial investigating the optimal number of treatment sessions of acupuncture, used as an adjunct to usual care, for managing chronic low back pain.

Methods:

In total, 45 participants with chronic low back pain were recruited and randomly allocated to receive usual care plus 4, 7, or 10 sessions of acupuncture (15/group). Primary outcomes were recruitment rate, randomization rate, treatment compliance, completion of the outcome measures, and retention rates. Secondary outcomes included back function, pain intensity and bothersomeness, generic health status, activity disability, and participant satisfaction. Data were collected at baseline and discharge, and at 6 and 12 weeks post randomization.

Results:

The recruitment method was demonstrated to be successful: recruitment rate was 43.7%, and randomization rate was 100%. Compliance with treatment was high among participants (86.7%, 86.7%, and 100% for the 4-, 7-, and 10-session group, respectively). Outcome questionnaires used in this study were found to be appropriate for a future randomized controlled trial. Participant retention rates were 88.9% at discharge and at 6 weeks post randomization and 84.4% at 12 weeks post randomization. Secondary outcomes (except for pain intensity) favored the 10-session acupuncture group at 12 weeks post randomization. Over 90% of participants indicated that they were “very satisfied” and/or “extremely satisfied” with the acupuncture treatment.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrated that a full-scale randomized controlled trial using the methodology described above is feasible, and such a trial is essential to test the dose dependence of acupuncture.

Keywords

Acupuncture treatment sessions dose dependence chronic low back pain feasibility study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Freburger

Holmes

Agans

et al . The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med 2009; 169(3): 251–258.

Hoy

Brooks

Blyth

et al . The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010; 24(6): 769–781.

Airaksinen

Brox

Cedraschi

et al . Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2006; 15(2): s192–s300.

Chou

Qaseem

Snow

et al . Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147(7): 478–491.

Savigny

Kuntze

Watson

et al . Low back pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009.

Xue

Zhang

Lin

et al . Acupuncture, chiropractic and osteopathy use in Australia: a national population survey. BMC Public Health 2008; 8(1): 1–8.

Hopton

Curnoe

Kanaan

et al . Acupuncture in practice: mapping the providers, the patients and the settings in a national cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2012; 2(1): e000456.

Austin

Ramamonjiarivelo

et al . Acupuncture use in the United States: who, where, why, and at what price? Health Mark Q 2015; 32(2): 113–128.

Liu

Skinner

McDonough

et al . Acupuncture for low back pain: an overview of systematic reviews. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015; 2015: 328196.

10.

Ezzo

Berman

Hadhazy

et al . Is acupuncture effective for the treatment of chronic pain? A systematic review. Pain 2000; 86(3): 217–225.

11.

White

Cummings

Barlas

et al . Defining an adequate dose of acupuncture using a neurophysiological approach—a narrative review of the literature. Acupunct Med 2008; 26(2): 111–120.

12.

Ceccherelli

Gagliardi

Barbagli

et al . Correlation between the number of sessions and therapeutical effect in patients suffering from low back pain treated with acupuncture: a randomized controlled blind study. Minerva Med 2003; 94(4 suppl. 1): 39–44.

13.

MacPherson

Fitter

Factors that influence outcome: an evaluation of change with acupuncture. Acupunct Med 1998; 16(1): 33–39.

14.

Yuan

Purepong

Hunter

et al . Different frequencies of acupuncture treatment for chronic low back pain: an assessor-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial. Complement Ther Med 2009; 17(3): 131–140.

15.

MacPherson

Maschino

Lewith

et al . Characteristics of acupuncture treatment associated with outcome: an individual patient meta-analysis of 17,922 patients with chronic pain in randomised controlled trials. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(10): e77438.

16.

Liu

Skinner

McDonough

et al . Does the dose of Traditional Chinese Medicine acupuncture in addition to usual care affect outcomes for adults with chronic low back pain? Protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study. Phys Ther Rev 2015; 20: 275–282.

17.

Boutron

Moher

Altman

et al . Methods and processes of the CONSORT group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148(4): W60–W66.

18.

MacPherson

Altman

Hammerschlag

et al . Revised standards for reporting interventions in clinical trials of acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. J Evid Based Med 2010; 3(3): 140–155.

19.

Little

Lewith

Webley

et al . Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42(12): 965–968.

20.

UK BEAM Trial Team. United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ 2004; 329(7479): 1377.

21.

Roland

Morris

A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983; 8(2): 141–144.

22.

Scott

Huskisson

EC.

Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2(2): 175–184.

23.

Ware

Kosinski

Keller

SD.

A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34(3): 220–233.

24.

Ries

PW.

Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey. United States, 1984. Vital Health Stat 1986; 10(156): 1–191.

25.

Hudak

Wright

JG.

The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3167–3177.

26.

Julious

SA.

Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 2005; 4(4): 287–291.

27.

E9 Expert Working Group. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Statistical principles for clinical trials. International conference on harmonisation E9 expert working group. Stat Med 1999; 18(15): 1905–1942.

28.

Bell

Fiero

Horton

et al . Handling missing data in RCTs: a review of the top medical journals. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 118.

29.

Shih

Problems in dealing with missing data and informative censoring in clinical trials. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2002; 3(1): 4.

30.

White

Horton

Carpenter

et al . Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data. Br Med J 2011; 342: d40.

31.

Roland

Fairbank

The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3115–3124.

32.

Ostelo

RWJG

de Vet

HCW

. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005; 19(4): 593–607.

33.

McDonough

Tully

Boyd

et al . Pedometer-driven walking for chronic low back pain: a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain 2013; 29(11): 972–981.

34.

Furlan

Pennick

Bombardier

et al . 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 2009; 34(18): 1929–1941.

35.

Craig

Dieppe

Macintyre

et al . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: a1655.

36.

Bombardier

Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3100–3103.

37.

Cope

DG.

Using electronic surveys in nursing research. Oncol Nurs Forum 2014; 41(6): 681–682.

38.

Zeng

Chung

JW-Y

. Acupuncture for chronic nonspecific low back pain: an overview of systematic reviews. Eur J Integr Med 2015; 7(2): 94–107.

39.

Maher

Sherrington

Herbert

et al . Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003; 83(8): 713–721.

40.

Arain

Campbell

Cooper

et al . What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 67.

41.

Meng

Wang

Ngeow

et al . Acupuncture for chronic low back pain in older patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Rheumatology 2003; 42(12): 1508–1517.

42.

Cherkin

Sherman

Avins

et al . A randomized trial comparing acupuncture, simulated acupuncture, and usual care for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169(9): 858–866.

43.

Hunter

McDonough

Bradbury

et al . Exercise and auricular acupuncture for chronic low-back pain: a feasibility randomized-controlled trial. Clin J Pain 2012; 28(3): 259–267.

44.

Hinman

McCrory

Pirotta

et al . Acupuncture for chronic knee pain: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312(13): 1313–1322.