The role of movement errors in modifying spatiotemporal gait asymmetry post stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective:

Current rehabilitation to improve gait symmetry following stroke is based on one of two competing motor learning strategies: minimizing or augmenting symmetry errors. We sought to determine which of those motor learning strategies best improves overground spatiotemporal gait symmetry.

Design:

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting:

Rehabilitation research lab.

Subjects:

In all, 47 participants (59 ± 12 years old) with chronic hemiparesis post stroke and spatiotemporal gait asymmetry were randomized to error augmentation, error minimization, or conventional treadmill training (control) groups.

Interventions:

To augment or minimize asymmetry on a step-by-step basis, we developed a responsive, “closed-loop” control system, using a split-belt instrumented treadmill that continuously adjusted the difference in belt speeds to be proportional to the patient’s current asymmetry.

Main measures:

Overground spatiotemporal asymmetries and gait speeds were collected prior to and following 18 training sessions.

Results:

Step length asymmetry reduced after training, but stance time did not. There was no group × time interaction. Gait speed improved after training, but was not affected by type of asymmetry, or group. Of those who trained to modify step length asymmetry, there was a moderately strong linear relationship between the change in step length asymmetry and the change in gait speed.

Conclusion:

Augmenting errors was not superior to minimizing errors or providing only verbal feedback during conventional treadmill walking. Therefore, the use of verbal feedback to target spatiotemporal asymmetry, which was common to all participants, appears to be sufficient to reduce step length asymmetry. Alterations in stance time asymmetry were not elicited in any group.

Keywords

Gait stroke asymmetry adaptation learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Patterson

Gage

Brooks

et al

Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. Gait Posture 2010; 31: 241–246.

Awad

Palmer

Pohlig

et al

Walking speed and step length asymmetry modify the energy cost of walking after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29: 416–423.

Lewek

Bradley

Wutzke

et al

The relationship between spatiotemporal gait asymmetry and balance in individuals with chronic stroke. J Appl Biomech 2014; 30: 31–36.

Norvell

Czerniecki

Reiber

et al

The prevalence of knee pain and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis among veteran traumatic amputees and nonamputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 487–493.

Jorgensen

Crabtree

Reeve

et al

Ambulatory level and asymmetrical weight bearing after stroke affects bone loss in the upper and lower part of the femoral neck differently: bone adaptation after decreased mechanical loading. Bone 2000; 27: 701–707.

Duncan

Sullivan

Behrman

et al

Protocol for the locomotor experience applied post-stroke (LEAPS) trial: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol 2007; 7: 39.

Hornby

Campbell

Kahn

et al

Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke. A randomized controlled study. Stroke 2008; 39: 1786–1792.

Sullivan

Brown

Klassen

et al

Effects of task-specific locomotor and strength training in adults who were ambulatory after stroke: results of the STEPS randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2007; 87: 1580–602; discussion 603–607.

Duncan

Sullivan

Behrman

et al

Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2026–2036.

10.

Patterson

Rodgers

Macko

et al

Effect of treadmill exercise training on spatial and temporal gait parameters in subjects with chronic stroke: a preliminary report. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008; 45: 221–228.

11.

Silver

Macko

Forrester

et al

Effects of aerobic treadmill training on gait velocity, cadence, and gait symmetry in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a preliminary report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000; 14: 65–71.

12.

Savin

Tseng

Whitall

et al

Poststroke hemiparesis impairs the rate but not magnitude of adaptation of spatial and temporal locomotor features. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27: 24–34.

13.

Kahn

Hornby

TG.

Rapid and long-term adaptations in gait symmetry following unilateral step training in people with hemiparesis. Phys Ther 2009; 89: 474–483.

14.

Lam

Luttmann

Houldin

et al

Treadmill-based locomotor training with leg weights to enhance functional ambulation in people with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther 2009; 33: 129–135.

15.

Kawato

. Feedback-error-learning neural network for supervised learning. In: Eckmiller

(ed.) Advanced neural computers. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990, pp.365–372.

16.

Schmidt

RA.

A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev 1975; 82: 225–260.

17.

Wutzke

Faldowski

Lewek

MD.

Individuals poststroke do not perceive their spatiotemporal gait asymmetries as abnormal. Phys Ther 2015; 95: 1244–1253.

18.

Reisman

Wityk

Silver

et al

Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke. Brain 2007; 130: 1861–1872.

19.

Reisman

McLean

Keller

et al

Repeated split-belt treadmill training improves poststroke step length asymmetry. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27: 460–468.

20.

Emken

Reinkensmeyer

DJ.

Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005; 13: 33–39.

21.

Gordon

Ferris

DP.

Learning to walk with a robotic ankle exoskeleton. J Biomech 2007; 40: 2636–2644.

22.

Feasel

Whitton

Kassler

et al

The integrated virtual environment rehabilitation treadmill system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2011; 19: 290–297.

23.

Plummer

Behrman

Duncan

et al

Effects of stroke severity and training duration on locomotor recovery after stroke: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 137–151.

24.

ACSM. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.

25.

Noble

Prentice

SD.

Adaptation to unilateral change in lower limb mechanical properties during human walking. Exp Brain Res 2006; 169: 482–495.

26.

Reisman

Block

Bastian

AJ.

Interlimb coordination during locomotion: what can be adapted and stored?

J Neurophysiol 2005; 94: 2403–2415.

27.

Taylor

II Hudson

Seeger

et al

VRPN: a device-independent, network-transparent VR peripheral system. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology, 15–17 November 2001, Banff, AB, Canada. New York: ACM.

28.

Gordon

Gulanick

Costa

et al

Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Circulation 2004; 109: 2031–2041.

29.

Lewek

Randall

EP.

Reliability of spatiotemporal asymmetry during overground walking for individuals following chronic stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 2011; 35: 116–121.

30.

Lewek

Cruz

Moore

et al

Allowing intralimb kinematic variability during locomotor training poststroke improves kinematic consistency: a subgroup analysis from a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2009; 89: 829–839.

31.

van Vliet

Wulf

. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 831–840.

32.

Kao

Srivastava

Agrawal

et al

Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. Gait Posture 2013; 37: 113–120.

33.

Domingo

Ferris

DP.

The effects of error augmentation on learning to walk on a narrow balance beam. Exp Brain Res 2010; 206: 359–370.

34.

Helm

Reisman

DS.

The split-belt walking paradigm: exploring motor learning and spatiotemporal asymmetry poststroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2015; 26: 703–713.

35.

Malone

Bastian

Torres-Oviedo

How does the motor system correct for errors in time and space during locomotor adaptation?

J Neurophysiol 2012; 108: 672–683.

36.

Awad

Reisman

Kesar

et al

Targeting paretic propulsion to improve poststroke walking function: a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95: 840–848.

37.

Flansbjer

Holmback

Downham

et al

Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 75–82.

38.

Awad

Reisman

Pohlig

et al

Reducing the cost of transport and increasing walking distance after stroke: a randomized controlled trial on fast locomotor training combined with functional electrical stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016; 30: 661–670.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.21 MB