To determine the effects of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) on gait, balance, gross motor function and activities of daily living in children with cerebral palsy.
Data sources:
Five databases were searched (Pubmed, Psycinfo, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier and Cochrane Library) before January 2018.
Review methods:
Studies of the effect of AFOs on gait, balance, gross motor function and activities of daily living in children with cerebral palsy were included. Articles with a modified PEDRO score ≥ 5/9 were selected. Data regarding population, AFO, interventions and outcomes were extracted. When possible, standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated from the outcomes.
Results:
Thirty-two articles, corresponding to 56 studies (884 children) were included. Fifty-one studies included children with spastic cerebral palsy. AFOs increased stride length (SMD = 0.88, P < 0.001) and gait speed (SMD = 0.28, P < 0.001), and decreased cadence (SMD = –0.72, P < 0.001). Gross motor function scores improved (Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) D (SMD = 0.30, P = 0.004), E (SMD = 0.28, P = 0.02), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) (SMD = 0.57, P < 0.001)). Data relating to balance and activities of daily living were insufficient to conclude. Posterior AFOs (solid, hinged, supra-malleolar, dynamic) increased ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact (SMD = 1.65, P < 0.001) and during swing (SMD = 1.34, P < 0.001), and decreased ankle power generation in stance (SMD = –0.72, P < 0.001) in children with equinus gait.
Conclusion:
In children with spastic cerebral palsy, there is strong evidence that AFOs induce small improvements in gait speed and moderate evidence that AFOs have a small to moderate effect on gross motor function. In children with equinus gait, there is strong evidence that posterior AFOs induce large changes in distal kinematics.
BjornsonKFZhouCStevensonRDet al. Relation of stride activity and participation in mobility-based life habits among children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2014; 95(2): 360–368.
2.
WingstrandMHägglundGRodby-BousquetE.Ankle-foot orthoses in children with cerebral palsy: a cross sectional population based study of 2200 children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2014; 215: 327.
SacazeEGarlantezecRRémy-NérisOet al. A survey of medical and paramedical involvement in children with cerebral palsy in Britanny: preliminary results. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2013; 56(4): 253–267.
5.
FigueiredoEMFerreiraGBMoreiraRCet al. Efficacy of ankle-foot orthoses on gait of children with cerebral palsy: systematic review of literature. Pediatr Phys Ther2008; 20(3): 207–223.
6.
NetoHPGreccoLAGalliMet al. Comparison of articulated and rigid ankle-foot orthoses in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Pediatr Phys Ther2012; 24(4): 308–312.
7.
AboutorabiAArazpourMBaniMAet al. Efficacy of ankle foot orthoses types on walking in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2017; 60: 393–402.
8.
MorrisCBowersRRossKet al. Orthotic management of cerebral palsy: recommendations from a consensus conference. Neurorehabilitation2011; 28(1): 37–46.
9.
KerkumYLBrehmM-ABuizerAIet al. Defining the mechanical properties of a spring-hinged ankle foot orthosis to assess its potential use in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Appl Biomech2014; 30(6): 728–731.
10.
Van GestelLMolenaersGHuenaertsCet al. Effect of dynamic orthoses on gait: a retrospective control study in children with hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol2008; 50(1): 63–67.
11.
RiesAJNovacheckTFSchwartzMH.The efficacy of ankle-foot orthoses on improving the gait of children with diplegic cerebral palsy: a multiple outcome analysis. PM R2015; 7: 922–929.
12.
LucareliPRMdeOLucarelliJGet al. Changes in joint kinematics in children with cerebral palsy while walking with and without a floor reaction ankle-foot orthosis. Clinics2007; 62(1): 63–68.
13.
BrehmM-AHarlaarJSchwartzM.Effect of ankle-foot orthoses on walking efficiency and gait in children with cerebral palsy. J Rehabil Med2008; 40(7): 529–534.
14.
BS 7313-1.1:1990. Prosthetics and orthotics. Terminology. Glossary of general terms relating to external limb prostheses and external orthoses.
15.
MaherCGSherringtonCHerbertRDet al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther2003; 83(8): 713–721.
16.
TysonSFSadeghi-DemnehENesterCJ.A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on gait biomechanics after stroke. Clin Rehabil2013; 27(10): 879–891.
17.
RidgewellEDobsonFBachTet al. A systematic review to determine best practice reporting guidelines for AFO interventions in studies involving children with cerebral palsy. Prosthet Orthot Int2010; 34(2): 129–145.
18.
EddisonNMulhollandMChockalingamN.Do research papers provide enough information on design and material used in ankle foot orthoses for children with cerebral palsy? A systematic review. J Child Orthop2017; 11(4): 263–271.
19.
RethlefsenSKayRDennisSet al. The effects of fixed and articulated ankle-foot orthoses on gait patterns in subjects with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop1999; 19(4): 470–474.
20.
CrenshawSHerzogRCastagnoPet al. The efficacy of tone-reducing features in orthotics on the gait of children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop2000; 20(2): 210–216.
21.
BuckonCEThomasSSJakobson-HustonSet al. Comparison of three ankle-foot orthosis configurations for children with spastic hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol2001; 43(6): 371–378.
22.
RomkesJHellAKBrunnerR.Changes in muscle activity in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy while walking with and without ankle-foot orthoses. Gait Posture2006; 24(4): 467–474.
23.
BalabanBYasarEDalUet al. The effect of hinged ankle-foot orthosis on gait and energy expenditure in spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil2007; 29(2): 139–144.
24.
SmithPAHassaniSGrafAet al. Brace evaluation in children with diplegic cerebral palsy with a jump gait pattern. J Bone Joint Surg Am2009; 91(2): 356–365.
25.
RadtkaSASkinnerSRDixonDMet al. A comparison of gait with solid, dynamic, and no ankle-foot orthoses in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Phys Ther1997; 77(4): 395–409.
26.
BuckonCEThomasSSJakobson-HustonSet al. Comparison of three ankle-foot orthosis configurations for children with spastic diplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol2004; 46(9): 590–598.
27.
RadtkaSASkinnerSRJohansonME.A comparison of gait with solid and hinged ankle-foot orthoses in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture2005; 21(3): 303–310.
28.
LamWKLeongJCYLiYHet al. Biomechanical and electromyographic evaluation of ankle foot orthosis and dynamic ankle foot orthosis in spastic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture2005; 22(3): 189–197.
29.
CarlsonWEVaughanCLDamianoDLet al. Orthotic management of gait in spastic diplegia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1997; 76(3): 219–225.
30.
BrunnerRMeierGRueppT.Comparison of a stiff and a spring-type ankle-foot orthosis to improve gait in spastic hemiplegic children. J Pediatr Orthop1998; 18(6): 719–726.
31.
SmileySJJacobsenFSMielkeCet al. A comparison of the effects of solid, articulated, and posterior leaf-spring ankle-foot orthoses and shoes alone on gait and energy expenditure in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Orthopedics2002; 25(4): 411–415.
32.
TaverneseEPetrarcaMRoselliniGet al. Carbon modular orthosis (Ca.M.O.): an innovative hybrid modular ankle-foot orthosis to tune the variable rehabilitation needs in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Neurorehabilitation2017; 40(3): 447–457.
33.
DursunEDursunNAlicanD.Ankle-foot orthoses: effect on gait in children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil2002; 24(7): 345–347.
34.
DesloovereKMolenaersGVan GestelLet al. How can push-off be preserved during use of an ankle foot orthosis in children with hemiplegia? A prospective controlled study. Gait Posture2006; 24(2): 142–151.
35.
BakerRMcGinleyJLSchwartzMHet al. The gait profile score and movement analysis profile. Gait Posture2009; 30(3): 265–269.
36.
RhaDKimDJParkES.Effect of hinged ankle-foot orthoses on standing balance control in children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Yonsei Med J2010; 51(5): 746–752.
37.
BjornsonKFSchmaleGAAdamczyk-FosterAet al. The effect of dynamic ankle foot orthoses on function in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop2006; 26(6): 773–776.
38.
SwinnenEBaeyensJ-PVan MuldersBet al. The influence of the use of ankle-foot orthoses on thorax, spine, and pelvis kinematics during walking in children with cerebral palsy. Prosthet Orthot Int2018; 42: 208–213.
39.
WilsonHHaideriNSongKet al. Ankle-foot orthoses for preambulatory children with spastic diplegia. J Pediatr Orthop1997; 17(3): 370–376.
40.
Sienko-ThomasSBuckonCEJakobson-HustonSet al. Stair locomotion in children with spastic hemiplegia: the impact of three different ankle foot orthosis (AFOs) configurations. Gait Posture2002; 16(2): 180–187.
41.
MaltaisDBar-OrOGaleaVet al. Use of orthoses lowers the O(2) cost of walking in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Med Sci Sports Exerc2001; 33(2): 320–325.
42.
KottKMHeldSL.Effects of orthoses on upright functional skills of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther2002; 14(4): 199–207.
43.
ParkESParkCIChangHJet al. The effect of hinged ankle-foot orthoses on sit-to-stand transfer in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85(12): 2053–2057.
44.
BahramizadehMMousaviMERassafianiMet al. The effect of floor reaction ankle foot orthosis on postural control in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Prosthet Orthot Int2012; 36(1): 71–76.
45.
VanwalaJDiwanSShahSet al. Effect of ankle foot orthosis on energy expenditure index and gait speed in spastic cerebral palsy children: an observational study. Int J Contemp Pediatr2014; 1(1): 17–19.
46.
KerkumYLHarlaarJBuizerAIet al. An individual approach for optimizing ankle-foot orthoses to improve mobility in children with spastic cerebral palsy walking with excessive knee flexion. Gait Posture2016; 46: 104–111.
47.
BhiseS.Comparison between physiological cost index in healthy normal children as against ambulatory spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (with and without orthosis) in the age group 6 to 8 years. Int J Physiother2017; 3(4): 395–400.
48.
SchmidSRomkesJTaylorWRet al. Orthotic correction of lower limb function during gait does not immediately influence spinal kinematics in spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture2016; 49: 457–462.
49.
GalliMCimolinVRigoldiCet al. Quantitative evaluation of the effects of ankle foot orthosis on gait in children with cerebral palsy using the gait profile score and gait variable scores. J Dev Phys Disabil2016; 28(3): 367–379.
50.
WrenTALDrydenJWMueskeNMet al. Comparison of 2 orthotic approaches in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther2015; 27(3): 218–226.
51.
MossbergKALintonKAFriskeK.Ankle-foot orthoses: effect on energy expenditure of gait in spastic diplegic children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71(7): 490–494.
52.
BjornsonKZhouCFatoneSet al. The effect of ankle-foot orthoses on community-based walking in cerebral palsy: a clinical pilot study. Pediatr Phys Ther2016; 28(2): 179–186.
53.
HarlaarJBrehmMBecherJGet al. Studies examining the efficacy of ankle foot orthoses should report activity level and mechanical evidence. Prosthet Orthot Int2010; 34(3): 327–335.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
