Comparing disability between traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury using the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and the WHO minimal generic data set covering functioning and health

Laxe S Tschiesner U Zasler N et al . What domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012; 114: 645–650.

Tate RL Godbee K Sigmundsdottir L. A systematic review of assessment tools for adults used in traumatic brain injury research and their relationship to the ICF. Neurorehabilitation 2013; 32: 729–750.

Chung P Yun SJ Khan F. A comparison of participation outcome measures and the international classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2014; 46: 108–116.

Shukla D Devi BI Agrawal A. Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011; 113: 435–441.

Magasi SR Heinemann AW Whiteneck GG. Participation following traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for research. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31: 145–156.

Alexander MS Anderson K Biering-Sorensen F et al . Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions. Spinal Cord 2009; 47: 582–591.

Barclay L McDonald R Lentin P. Social and community participation following spinal cord injury: a critical review. Int J Rehabil Res 2015; 38: 1–19.

Lingsma HF Roozenbeek B Steyerberg EW et al . Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 543–554.

Von Steinbuchel N Covic A Polinder S et al . Assessment of health-related quality of life after TBI: comparison of a disease-specific (QOLIBRI) with a generic (SF-36) instrument. Behavior Neurol 2016; 2016: 7928014.

Nugter MA Hermens MLM Robbers S et al . Use of outcome measurements in clinical practice: how specific should one be? Psychother Res 2017; 3: 1–13.

World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneve: World Health Organization, 2001.

Üstün TBKN Chatterji S Rehm J. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.

Cieza A Oberhauser C Bickenbach J et al . Towards a minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 218.

Silva AG Queiros A Sa-Couto P et al . Self-reported disability: association with lower extremity performance and other determinants in older adults attending primary care. Phys Ther 2015; 95: 1628–1637.

Kay TH Douglas E Adams R et al . Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab 1993; 8: 86.

Kirshblum S Waring W 3rd . Updates for the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2014; 25: 505–517, vii.

Andrews G Kemp A Sunderland M et al . Normative data for the 12 Item WHO disability assessment schedule 2.0. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e8343.

Noonan VK Kopec JA Noreau L et al . Comparing the content of participation instruments using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009; 7: 93.

Noonan VK Kopec JA Noreau L et al . A review of participation instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 1883–1901.

Post MW de Witte LP Reichrath E et al . Development and validation of IMPACT-S, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40: 620–627.

Van Der Zee CH Post MW Brinkhof MW et al . Comparison of the Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation with the ICF measure of participation and activities screener and the WHO disability assessment schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95: 87–93.

Noonan V Kopec J Noreau L et al . Measuring participation among persons with spinal cord injury: comparison of three instruments. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2010; 15: 49–62.

Noonan VK Kopec JA Noreau L et al . Comparing the validity of five participation instruments in persons with spinal conditions. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 724–734.

Noonan VK Kopec JA Noreau L et al . Comparing the reliability of five participation instruments in persons with spinal conditions. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 735–743.

Wolf AC Tate RL Lannin NA et al . The World Health Organization disability assessment scale, WHODAS II: reliability and validity in the measurement of activity and participation in a spinal cord injury population. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44: 747–755.

Snell DL Iverson GL Panenka WJ et al . Preliminary validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 for mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotraum 2017; 34: 3256–3261.

Federici S Bracalenti M Meloni F et al . World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2017; 39: 2347–2380.

Kuo CY Liou TH Chang KH et al. Functioning and disability analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury by using the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12: 4116–4127.

De Pedro-Cuesta J Alberquilla Á Virués-Ortega J et al . ICF disability measured by WHO-DAS II in three community diagnostic groups in Madrid, Spain. Gac Sanit 2011; 25: 21–28.

Saltychev M Tarvonen-Schroder S Barlund E et al . Differences between rehabilitation team, rehabilitants, and significant others in opinions on functioning of subacute stroke survivors: Turku ICF study. Int J Rehabil Res 2014; 37: 229–235.