Discriminative ability and clinical utility of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) in identifying falls risk in people with multiple sclerosis: a prospective cohort study

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate discriminative ability and clinical utility of the Timed Up and Go under single- and dual-task conditions between fallers and non-fallers in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Design:

Prospective cohort study.

Setting:

Neurology service in a tertiary hospital.

Subjects:

Participants were 101 people with MS and Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3–6.5. One participant withdrew after the baseline assessment, and hence the data were analysed for 100 participants.

Interventions:

No specific intervention.

Main Measures:

Timed Up and Go and Timed Up and Go-Cognitive. Three-month prospective diaries recorded falls.

Results:

Mean age was 52.6 (SD 10.7) and 66 were female. Majority of the participants had progressive MS (72) and 73 used a walking aid; 56 participants recorded 791 falls. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for Timed Up and Go and Timed Up and Go-Cognitive in distinguishing fallers (person with ⩾1 fall) from non-fallers are 0.60 and 0.57, respectively, and in distinguishing multiple fallers (⩾2 falls) the values are 0.46 and 0.43. A Timed Up and Go score of ⩾9 seconds has a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.34 to identify fallers and a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.27 to identify multiple fallers. A Timed Up and Go-Cognitive score of ⩾11 seconds has a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.30 to identify fallers and a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.26 to identify multiple fallers.

Conclusion:

The Timed Up and Go and Timed Up and Go-Cognitive do not demonstrate sufficient clinical utility or discriminative ability for assessing falls risk in MS.

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis accidental falls risk Timed Up and Go

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nilsagård

Gunn

Freeman

, et al. Falls in people with MS – an individual data meta-analysis from studies from Australia, Sweden, United Kingdom and the United States. Mult Scler 2015; 21: 92–100.

Gunn

Newell

Haas

, et al. Identification of risk factors for falls in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther 2013; 93: 504–513.

Larkin

O’Rourke

McGuigan

, et al. Societal cost of multiple sclerosis in Ireland, 2015, http://ms-society.ie/uploads/File/Living%20with%20MS/Our%20publications/MS%20Ireland%20-%20Societal%20Cost%20of%20MS%20in%20Ireland%202015cc.pdf

Peterson

Cho

von Koch

, et al. Injurious falls among middle aged and older adults with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1031–1037.

Quinn

Comber

Galvin

, et al. The ability of clinical balance measures to identify falls risk in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2018; 32: 571–582.

Kenny

Rubenstein

Tinetti

, et al. Summary of the updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59: 148–157.

Sebastião

Sandroff

Learmonth

, et al. Validity of the timed up and go test as a measure of functional mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: 1072–1077.

Nilsagard

Lundholm

Gunnarsson

L-G

, et al. Clinical relevance using timed walk tests and ‘timed up and go’ testing in persons with multiple sclerosis. Physiother Res Int 2007; 12: 105–114.

Wajda

Motl

Sosnoff

JJ.

Dual task cost of walking is related to fall risk in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2013; 335: 160–163.

10.

Potter

Cohen

Allen

, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with multiple sclerosis: recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association Neurology Section Task Force. Phys Ther 2014; 94: 593–608.

11.

Cattaneo

Regola

Meotti

Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 789–795.

12.

Kalron

Dolev

Givon

Further construct validity of the timed up-and-go test as a measure of ambulation in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 841–847.

13.

Dibble

Lopez-Lennon

Lake

, et al. Utility of disease-specific measures and clinical balance tests in prediction of falls in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Phys Ther 2013; 37: 99–104.

14.

Tajali

Shaterzadeh-Yazdi

M-J

Negahban

, et al. Predicting falls among patients with multiple sclerosis: comparison of patient-reported outcomes and performance-based measures of lower extremity functions. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2017; 17: 69–74.

15.

Von Elm

Altman

Egger

, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007; 4: e296.

16.

Kurtzke

JF.

Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33: 1444–1452.

17.

Lamb

Jørstad-Stein

Hauer

, et al. Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the Prevention of Falls Network Europe Consensus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 1618–1622.

18.

Matsuda

Shumway-Cook

Bamer

, et al. Falls in multiple sclerosis. PM R 2011; 3: 624–632.

19.

Moons

KGM

Altman

Reitsma

, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162: W1–W73.

20.

Hanley

McNeil

BJ.

The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29–36.

21.

Riddle

Stratford

PW.

Interpreting validity indexes for diagnostic tests: an illustration using the berg balance test. Phys Ther 1999; 79: 939–948.

22.

Jaeschke

Guyatt

Sackett

, et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271: 703–707.

23.

Sosnoff

Socie

Boes

, et al. Mobility, balance and falls in persons with multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e28021.

24.

Kojima

Masud

Kendrick

, et al. Does the timed up and go test predict future falls among British community-dwelling older people? Prospective cohort study nested within a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2015; 15: 38.

25.

Kerr

Worringham

Cole

, et al. Predictors of future falls in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2010; 75: 116–124.

26.

Dibble

Lange

Predicting falls in individuals with Parkinson disease: a reconsideration of clinical balance measures. J Neurol Phys Ther 2006; 30: 60–67.

27.

Andersson

AKK

Seiger

Appelros

How to identify potential fallers in a stroke unit: validity indexes of four test methods. J Rehabil Med 2006; 38: 186–191.

28.

Barry

Galvin

Keogh

, et al. Is the timed up and go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 2014; 14: 14.

29.

Nilsagård

Lundholm

Denison

, et al. Predicting accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis – a longitudinal study. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23: 259–269.

30.

Deeks

Altman

DG.

Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ 2004; 329: 168–169.

31.

Jaeschke

Guyatt

Lijmer

Diagnostic tests. In: Guyatt

Rennie

Meade

, et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature – a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago, IL: AMA Press, 2002, pp.121–40.

32.

Greene

Caulfield

Lamichhane

, et al. Longitudinal assessment of falls in patients with Parkinson’s disease using inertial sensors and the timed up and go test. J Rehabil Ass Technol Eng 2018; 5: 2055668317750811.

33.

Carling

Forsberg

Nilsagård

Falls in people with multiple sclerosis: experiences of 115 fall situations. Clin Rehabil 2018; 32: 526–535.

34.

Prosperini

Fortuna

Giannì

, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of static posturography in predicting accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27: 45–52.

35.

Plummer

Eskes

Measuring treatment effects on dual-task performance: a framework for research and clinical practice. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9: 225.

36.

Giannì

Prosperini

Jonsdottir

, et al. A systematic review of factors associated with accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis: a meta-analytic approach. Clin Rehabil 2014; 28: 704–716.

37.

Ersoy

MacWalter

Durmus

, et al. Predictive effects of different clinical balance measures and the fear of falling on falls in postmenopausal women aged 50 years and over. Gerontology 2009; 55: 660–665.

38.

Ward

Leveille

Beauchamp

, et al. Functional performance as a predictor of injurious falls among older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63: 315–320.