Partially dead,partially separated: establishing the mechanism between ambiguous loss and grief reaction among caregivers of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness

Abstract

Objectives:

To trace the psychological mechanism underlying caregivers’ emotional experience in prolonged disorders of consciousness, by examining the mediating role of boundary ambiguity in the relationship between ambiguous loss and grief.

Design:

Cross-sectional design.

Setting:

The Respiratory Rehabilitation Division of a long-term medical and rehabilitation institute.

Subjects:

A total of 64 primary caregivers (69% female) of patients in a vegetative state (n = 49) or minimally conscious state (n = 15), with a mean age of 55.5 (SD = 12.3) years. Participants were mostly the patient’s children (62%) or partners (27%). The mean caregiving duration was 4.9 (SD = 5.1) years.

Main measures:

The Boundary Ambiguity Scale, the Revised Need for Closure Scale, an adapted version of the multifactor Two-Track Bereavement Questionnaire, and a sociodemographic questionnaire, which included items regarding caregiving: frequency of visits and perception of the patient’s psychological presence.

Results:

(1) Caregivers’ grief scores (total TTBQ: mean = 2.97; SD = 0.55) did not significantly differ from those exhibited by a normative bereavement sample. (2) Time since injury did not affect caregivers’ grief scores (three-year cut-point; P > .05). (3) Mediation analyses revealed that boundary ambiguity (mean = 34.03; SD = 7.55) significantly mediates the relationship between need for closure (B = .11; confidence interval (CI) = .04–.23) and grief; frequency of visits (B = .05, CI = .02–.10) and grief and perception of psychological presence (B = .26, CI = .00–.61) and grief in three separate models.

Conclusion:

Ambiguity concerning relational boundaries hinders caregivers’ ongoing grief reaction and impedes their ability to integrate the loss. High frequency of visits, belief in the patient’s psychological presence and difficulties in tolerating uncertainty are all clinical manifestations of caregivers’ entangled experience.

Keywords

Ambiguous loss boundary ambiguity caregivers disorder of consciousness grief minimally conscious state persistent vegetative state

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Royal College of Physicians. Prolonged disorders of consciousness: national clinical guidelines. London: RCP, 2013.

Monti

Laureys

Owen

AM.

The vegetative state. BMJ 2010; 341: c3765.

Leonardi

Sattin

Raggi

An Italian population study on 600 persons in vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Brain Inj 2013; 27: 473–484.

Corallo

Bonanno

Buono

, et al. Psychological distress of family members of vegetative and minimally conscious state patients. Acta Medica Mediterr 2015; 31(2): 297–302.

Moretta

Estraneo

De Lucia

, et al. A study of the psychological distress in family caregivers of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness during in-hospital rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2014; 28(7): 717–725.

Pagani

Giovannetti

Covelli

, et al. Physical and mental health, anxiety and depressive symptoms in caregivers of patients in vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Clin Psychol Psychother 2014; 21(5): 420–426.

Giovannetti

Covelli

Sattin

, et al. Caregivers of patients with disorder of consciousness: burden, quality of life and social support. Acta Neurol Scand 2015; 132(4): 259–269.

Chiambretto

Rossi Ferrario

Zotti

AM.

Patients in a persistent vegetative state: caregiver attitudes and reactions. Acta Neurol Scand 2001; 104(6): 364–368.

Covelli

Sattin

Giovannetti

, et al. Caregiver’s burden in disorders of consciousness: a longitudinal study. Acta Neurol Scand 2016; 134(5): 352–359.

10.

Giovannetti

Leonardi

Pagani

, et al. Burden of caregivers of patients in vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Acta Neurol Scand 2013; 127(1): 10–18.

11.

Leonardi

Giovannetti

Pagani

, et al. Burden and needs of 487 caregivers of patients in vegetative state and in minimally conscious state: results from a national study. Brain Inj 2012; 26(10): 1201–1210.

12.

Chiambretto

Moroni

Guarnerio

, et al. Prolonged grief and depression in caregivers of patients in vegetative state. Brain Inj 2010; 24(4): 581–588.

13.

De la Morena

MJE

Cruzado

JA.

Caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness: coping and prolonged grief. Acta Neurol Scand 2013; 127(6): 413–418.

14.

Guarnerio

Prunas

Della Fontana

, et al. Prevalence and comorbidity of prolonged grief disorder in a sample of caregivers of patients in a vegetative state. Psychiatr Q 2012; 83(1): 65–73.

15.

Bastianelli

Gius

Cipolletta

Changes over time in the quality of life, prolonged grief and family strain of family caregivers of patients in vegetative state: a pilot study. J Health Psychol 2014; 21: 844–852.

16.

Hamama-Raz

Zabari

Buchbinder

From hope to despair, and back: being the wife of a patient in a persistent vegetative state. Qual Health Res 2013; 23(2): 231–240.

17.

Kitzinger

Grief, anger and despair in relatives of severely brain injured patients: responding without pathologising (Editorial). Clin Rehabil 2014; 28: 627–631.

18.

Boss

Ambiguous loss: learning to live with unresolved grief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press, 1999.

19.

Cipolletta

Pasi

Avesani

Vita tua, mors mea: the experience of family caregivers of patients in a vegetative state. J Health Psychol 2016; 21(7): 1197–1206.

20.

Giovannetti

Černiauskaite

Leonardi

, et al. Informal caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness: experience of ambiguous loss. Brain Inj 2015; 29(4): 473–480.

21.

Kitzinger

“This in-between”: how families talk about death in relation to disorders of consciousness. In: Van Brussels

Carpentier

(eds) The social construction of death. London: Palgrave, 2014, pp.239–258.

22.

Soeterik

Connolly

Playford

, et al. The psychological impact of prolonged disorders of consciousness on caregivers: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31(10): 1374–1385.

23.

Rubin

SS.

The two-track model of bereavement: overview, retrospect, and prospect. Death Stud 1999; 23(8): 681–714.

24.

Boss

Greenberg

Pearce-McCall

Measurement of boundary ambiguity in families. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, 1990.

25.

Boss

Caron

Horbal

, et al. Predictors of depression in caregivers of dementia patients: boundary ambiguity and mastery. Fam Process 1990; 29: 245–254.

26.

Webster

Kruglanski

AW.

Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 67(6): 1049–1062.

27.

Roets

Van Hiel

Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the need for closure scale. Pers Indiv Differ 2011; 50(1): 90–94.

28.

Rubin

Nadav

Malkinson

, et al. The two-track model of bereavement questionnaire (TTBQ): development and validation of a relational measure. Death Stud 2009; 33(4): 305–333.

29.

Baron

Kenny

DA.

The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51(6): 1173–1182.

30.

Preacher

Hayes

AF.

Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40: 879–891.

31.

Boss

The trauma and complicated grief of ambiguous loss. Pastoral Psychol 2010; 59(2): 137–145.

32.

Boss

Ambiguous loss research, theory, and practice: reflections after 9/11. J Marriage Fam 2004; 66(3): 551–566.

33.

Rubin

Malkinson

Witztum

Working with the bereaved: multiple lenses on loss and mourning. New York: Routledge, 2012.

34.

Stern

Sazbon

Becker

, et al. Severe behavioural disturbance in families of patients with prolonged coma. Brain Inj 1988; 2(3): 259–262.

35.

Dupuis

SL.

Understanding ambiguous loss in the context of dementia care: adult children’s perspectives. J Gerontol Soc Work 2002; 37(2): 93–115.

36.

Boss

Loving someone who has dementia. How to find hope while coping with stress and grief. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2011.

37.

Rando

. A comprehensive analysis of anticipatory grief: perspectives, processes, promises, and problems. In: Rando

(ed.) Loss and anticipatory grief. New York: Lexington Books, 1986, pp.1–36.

38.

Blandin

Pepin

Dementia grief: a theoretical model of a unique grief experience. Dementia 2017; 16(1): 67–78.

39.

Crawford

Beaumont

JG.

Psychological needs of patients in low awareness states, their families, and health professionals. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2015; 15(3–4): 548–555.

40.

Jox

Kuehlmeyer

Klein

, et al. Diagnosis and decision making for patients with disorders of consciousness: a survey among family members. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96(2): 323–330.

41.

Monti

Vanhaudenhuyse

Coleman

, et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med 2010; 362(7): 579–589.

42.

Fernández-Espejo

Owen

AM.

Detecting awareness after severe brain injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013; 14(11): 801–809.

43.

Rodrigue

Riopelle

Bernat

, et al. How contextual and relational aspects shape the perspective of healthcare providers on decision making for patients with disorders of consciousness: a qualitative interview study. Narrat Inq Bioeth 2013; 3(3): 261–273.

44.

Samuel

Kitzinger

Reporting consciousness in coma: media framing of neuro-scientific research, hope, and the response of families with relatives in vegetative and minimally conscious states. JOMEC J 2013; 3: 1–15.

45.

Tresch

Sims

Duthie

, et al. Patients in a persistent vegetative state attitudes and reactions of family members. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39(1): 17–21.

46.

Bowlby

Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1982; 52(4): 664–678.

47.

Boss

A clarification of the concept of psychological father presence in families experiencing ambiguity of boundary. J Marriage Fam 1977; 39: 141–151.

48.

Kaplan

Boss

Depressive symptoms among spousal caregivers of institutionalized mates with Alzheimer’s: boundary ambiguity and mastery as predictors. Fam Process 1999; 38(1): 85–103.

49.

Berge

Holm

KE.

Boundary ambiguity in parents with chronically ill children: integrating theory and research. Fam Relat 2007; 56(2): 123–134.

50.

Landau

Hissett

Mild traumatic brain injury: impact on identity and ambiguous loss in the family. Fam Syst Health 2008; 26(1): 69–85.

51.

Bowen

Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson, 1978.

52.

Holland

Kitzinger

Death, treatment decisions and the permanent vegetative state: evidence from families and experts. Med Health Care Philos 2014; 17(3): 413–423.

53.

Constable

Withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration for patients in a permanent vegetative state: changing tack. Bioethics 2012; 26(3): 157–163.

54.

Kitzinger

Cowley

When “sanctity of life” and “self-determination” clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53—implications for policy and practice. J Med Ethics 2017; 43: 446–449.