French validation of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale and further psychometric properties exploration among 168 people with osteoarthritis

Abstract

Objective:

To validate the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale—French version (ASES-F) of the ASES questionnaire designed to evaluate self-efficacy in arthritis population and to confirm its psychometric properties.

Design:

The translation/back-translation procedure was done in line with cross-cultural adaptation international guidelines. Prospective multicenter validation was performed on 168 patients with osteoarthritis who filled out the ASES-F. Function subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD), Knee Osteoarthritis Fears and Beliefs Questionnaire, and pain on visual analog scale were collected. Acceptability, internal consistency, reproducibility, internal and external structure validity, and sensitivity following a self-management program focused on physical activity were analyzed. The retest was performed 15 days later.

Results:

A culturally adapted version was obtained following the validation procedure. The final translated questionnaire is available within the full article. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was at 0.95 for the overall ASES-F. Regarding the test–retest reproducibility, Lin’s concordance coefficient was at 0.84. The internal and external validity was also explored with correlations at −0.50 between ASES-F and (WOMAC), and significant correlations between ASES-F and HAD. Sensitivity shown significant improvement at three months for the subscale function only (+2.65, P < 0.01).

Conclusion:

The ASES-F, French version of the ASES, available in supplemental data, was validated in knee osteoarthritis patients and could be used in clinical practice and research for French-speaking patients. Sensitivity needs to be more explored.

Keywords

Osteoarthritis self-efficacy self-management translations cross-cultural comparison

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allegrante

Marks

Self-efficacy in management of osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2003; 29(4): 747vi–768vii.

Marks

A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (Part I). Health Promot Pract 2005; 6(1): 37–43.

Kroll

Kehn

P-S

et al . The SCI Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES): development and psychometric properties. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007; 4: 34.

Steca

Greco

Cappelletti

et al . Cardiovascular management self-efficacy: psychometric properties of a new scale and its usefulness in a rehabilitation context. Ann Behav Med Publ Soc Behav Med 2015; 49(5): 660–674.

Lorig

Chastain

Ung

et al . Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32(1): 37–44.

Brady

TJ.

Measures of self-efficacy: Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES), Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale-8 Item (ASES-8), Children’s Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (CASE), Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale (CDSES), Parent’s Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (PASE), and Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (RASE). Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63(suppl. 11): S473–S185.

Barlow

Williams

Wright

CC.

The reliability and validity of the arthritis self-efficacy scale in a UK context. Psychol Health Med 1997; 2(1): 3–17.

Lomi

Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale. Scand J Caring Sci 1992; 6(3): 131–138.

Taal

Riemsma

Brus

et al . Group education for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patient Educ Couns 1993; 20(2–3): 177–187.

10.

Unsal

Kasikci

MK.

Effect of education on perceived self-efficacy for individuals with arthritis. Int J Caring Sci 2010; 3(1): 3–11.

11.

González

Stewart

Ritter

et al . Translation and validation of arthritis outcome measures into Spanish. Arthritis Rheumatol 1995; 38(10): 1429–1446.

12.

Wilcox

Schoffman

Dowda

et al . Psychometric properties of the 8-item English Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale in a diverse sample. Arthritis 2014; 2014: 385256.

13.

Mueller

Hartmann

Mueller

et al . Validation of the arthritis self-efficacy short-form scale in German fibromyalgia patients. Eur J Pain Lond Engl 2003; 7(2): 163–171.

14.

Gay

Guiguet-Auclair

Pereira

et al . Efficacy of self-management exercise program with spa therapy for behavioral management of knee osteoarthritis: research protocol for a quasi-randomized controlled trial (GEET one). BMC Complement Altern Med 2018; 18(1): 279.

15.

Beaton

Bombardier

Guillemin

et al . Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3186–3191.

16.

Gay

Eschalier

Levyckyj

et al . Motivators for and barriers to physical activity in people with knee osteoarthritis: a qualitative study. Joint Bone Spin, 2018, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1297319X17301409

17.

Gay

Chabaud

Guilley

et al . Educating patients about the benefits of physical activity and exercise for their hip and knee osteoarthritis: systematic literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2016; 59(3): 174–183.

18.

Altman

Asch

Bloch

et al . Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheumatol 1986; 29(8): 1039–1049.

19.

Bellamy

Buchanan

Goldsmith

et al . Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15(12): 1833–1840.

20.

Choquette

Bellamy

Raynauld

JP.

A French-Canadian version of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37: S226.

21.

Zigmond

Snaith

RP.

The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67(6): 361–370.

22.

Benhamou

Baron

Dalichampt

et al . Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing fears and beliefs of patients with knee osteoarthritis: the Knee Osteoarthritis Fears and Beliefs Questionnaire (KOFBeQ). PLoS One 2013; 8(1): e53886.

23.

Hawker

Mian

Kendzerska

et al . Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS). Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63(suppl. 11): S240–S252.

24.

Deyo

Diehr

Patrick

DL.

Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991; 12(4): S142–S158.

25.

Terwee

Bot

SDM

de Boer

et al . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60(1): 34–42.

26.

Fermanian

Validation des échelles d’évaluation en médecine physique et de réadaptation : comment apprécier correctement leurs qualités psychométriques. Ann Réadapt Médecine Phys 2005; 48(6): 281–287.

27.

Aaronson

Alonso

Burnam

et al . Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002; 11(3): 193–205.

28.

Eisen

Ware

Donald

et al . Measuring components of children’s health status. Med Care 1979; 17(9): 902–921.

29.

Ware

Gandek

Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 945–952.

30.

Hobart

Lamping

Fitzpatrick

et al . The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): a new patient-based outcome measure. Brain J Neurol 2001; 124(Pt. 5): 962–973.

31.

Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient, https://ncss-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/themes/ncss/pdf/Procedures/NCSS/Lins_Concordance_Correlation_Coefficient.pdf

32.

CCC function—R Documentation, https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/DescTools/versions/0.99.19/topics/CCC (accessed 2 September 2018).

33.

Fitzpatrick

Davey

Buxton

et al . Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2(14): i1–iv74.

34.

Srikanth

Fryer

Zhai

et al . A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13(9): 769–781.

35.

Blagojevic

Jinks

Jeffery

et al . Risk factors for onset of osteoarthritis of the knee in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18(1): 24–33.

36.

Brand

Nyland

Henzman

et al . Arthritis self-efficacy scale scores in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthritis self-management education with or without exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013; 43(12): 895–910.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.59 MB