The effectiveness of somatosensory retraining for improving sensory function in the arm following stroke: a systematic review

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate if somatosensory retraining programmes assist people to improve somatosensory discrimination skills and arm functioning after stroke.

Data sources:

Nine databases were systematically searched: Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsychInfo, Embase, Amed, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, OT seeker, and Cochrane Library.

Review methods:

Studies were included for review if they involved (1) adult participants who had somatosensory impairment in the arm after stroke, (2) a programme targeted at retraining somatosensation, (3) a primary measure of somatosensory discrimination skills in the arm, and (4) an intervention study design (e.g. randomized or non-randomized control designs).

Results:

A total of 6779 articles were screened. Five group trials and five single case experimental designs were included (N = 199 stroke survivors). Six studies focused exclusively on retraining somatosensation and four studies focused on somatosensation and motor retraining. Standardized somatosensory measures were typically used for tactile, proprioception, and haptic object recognition modalities. Sensory intervention effect sizes ranged from 0.3 to 2.2, with an average effect size of 0.85 across somatosensory modalities. A majority of effect sizes for proprioception and tactile somatosensory domains were greater than 0.5, and all but one of the intervention effect sizes were larger than the control effect sizes, at least as point estimates. Six studies measured motor and/or functional arm outcomes (n = 89 participants), with narrative analysis suggesting a trend towards improvement in arm use after somatosensory retraining.

Conclusion:

Somatosensory retraining may assist people to regain somatosensory discrimination skills in the arm after stroke.

Keywords

Stroke somatosensation treatment intervention effect size

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hebert

Lindsay

McIntyre

et al . Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke 2016; 11(4): 459–484.

Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guidelines for stroke. 5th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2016.

Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Stroke Foundation, 2017.

Winstein

Stein

Arena

et al . Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2016; 47(6): e98–e169.

Doyle

Bennett

Gustafsson

Clinical decision making when addressing upper limb post-stroke sensory impairments. Brit J Occup Ther 2013; 76(6): 254–263.

Doyle

Bennett

Dudgeon

Sensory impairment after stroke: exploring therapists’ clinical decision making. Can J Occup Ther 2014; 81(4): 215–225.

Doyle

Bennett

Fasoli

et al . Interventions for sensory impairment in the upper limb after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 6: CD006331.

Carey

Lamp

Turville

The state-of-the-science on somatosensory function and its impact on daily life in adults, older adults and following stroke: a scoping review. OTJR 2016; 36(2 suppl.): 27S–41S.

Pumpa

Cahill

Carey

LM.

Somatosensory assessment and treatment after stroke: an evidence-practice gap. Aust Occup Ther J 2015; 62(2): 93–104.

10.

Doyle

Bennett

Gustafsson

Occupational therapy for upper limb post-stroke sensory impairments: a survey. Br J Occup Ther 2013; 76(10): 434–442.

11.

Yekutiel

Sensory re-education of the hand after stroke. London: Whurr, 2000.

12.

Carey

LM.

Touch and body sensations. In: Carey

(ed.) Stroke rehabilitation: insights from neuroscience and imaging. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp.157–172.

13.

Schabrun

Hillier

Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23(1): 27–39.

14.

Carey

Blennerhassett

Matyas

TA.

Commentary: evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke remains limited. Aust Occup Ther J 2010; 57(3): 200–204.

15.

Carey

LM.

Somatosensory loss after stroke. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1995; 7(1): 51–91.

16.

Borstad

Nichols-Larsen

DS.

Assessing and treating higher level somatosensory impairments post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2014; 21(4): 290–295.

17.

Kessner

Bingel

Thomalla

Somatosensory deficits after stroke: a scoping review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2016; 23(2): 136–146.

18.

Liberati

Altman

Tetzlaff

et al . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000100.

19.

Perdices

Savage

Tate

et al . Rater’s manual for between-group studies (RCTS and NonRCTs): introduction to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale for rating methodological Quality, Adapted for PsycBITE (Pedro-P). Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of Sydney, 2009.

20.

Tate

Rosenkoetter

Wakim

et al . The Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale: an expanded manual for the critical appraisal of single case reports. Sydney, NSW, Australia: John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, 2015.

21.

Grissom

Kim

JJ.

Effect sizes for research: univariate and multivariate applications. New York: Taylor and Francis Group, 2012.

22.

Connell

Lincoln

Radford

Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery. Clin Rehabil 2008; 22(8): 758–767.

23.

Wolny

Saulicz

Gnat

et al . Butler’s neuromobilizations combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation are effective in reducing of upper limb sensory in late-stage stroke subjects: a three-group randomized trial. Clin Rehabil 2010; 24(9): 810–821.

24.

Cambier

De Corte

Danneels

et al . Treating sensory impairments in the post-stroke upper limb with intermittent pneumatic compression. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17(1): 14–20.

25.

Yekutiel

Guttman

A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993; 56(3): 241–244.

26.

Carey

Matyas

Oke

LE.

Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74(6): 602–611.

27.

Smania

Montagnana

Faccioli

et al . Rehabilitation of somatic sensation and related deficit of motor control in patients with pure sensory stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84(11): 1692–1702.

28.

Byl

Roderick

Mohamed

et al . Effectiveness of sensory and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb following the principles of neuroplasticity: patients stable poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003; 17(3): 176–191.

29.

Carey

Matyas

TA.

Training of somatosensory discrimination after stroke: facilitation of stimulus generalization. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84(6): 428–442.

30.

Byl

Pitsch

Abrams

GM.

Functional outcomes can vary by dose: learning-based sensorimotor training for patients stable poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22(5): 494–504.

31.

Carey

Matyas

TA.

Effectiveness of sensory discrimination training when delivered by family members: a pilot study. Brain Impair 2008; 9(2): 140–151.

32.

Helliwell

Does the use of a sensory re-education programme improve the somatosensory and motor function of the upper limb in subacute stroke? A single case experimental design. Brit J Occup Ther 2009; 72(12): 551–558.

33.

Carey

Macdonell

Matyas

TA.

SENSe: study of the effectiveness of neurorehabilitation on sensation: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25(4): 304–313.

34.

de Diego

Puig

Navarro

. A sensorimotor stimulation program for rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2013; 31(4): 361–371.

35.

Cohen

Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 2013.

36.

Veerbeek

van Wegen

van Peppen

et al . What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014; 9(2): e87987.

37.

Carey

Matyas

Baum

Effects of somatosensory impairment on participation post-stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2018; 72(3): 7203205100.

38.

Doyle

Bennett

Dudgeon

Upper limb post-stroke sensory impairments: The survivor’s experience. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36(12): 993–1000.

39.

Meyer

Karttunen

Thijs

et al . How do somatosensory deficits in the arm and hand relate to upper limb impairment, activity, and participation problems after stroke? A systematic review. Phys Ther 2014; 94(9): 1220–1231.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.73 MB