Is independence enough? Rehabilitation should include autonomy and social engagement to achieve quality of life

Abstract

Purpose:

This discussion paper argues that holding independence as the central goal for rehabilitation has limitations that hinder successful outcomes. It shows why autonomy and social engagement should also serve as goals of rehabilitation, in order to achieve quality of life and effective functioning.

Methods:

The paper reviews problems arising from the over-emphasis on independence in rehabilitation. Although independence is a valuable goal on some tasks, it is sometimes not possible or desirable and is best complimented by autonomy and social engagement. Autonomy recognises that enacting some goals requires the support of other people. Autonomy is thus linked to social engagement (connectivity) in the workplace and personal relationships. The paper applies this framework to motor and cognitive disabilities.

Results:

The inclusion of autonomy and social engagement as goals for rehabilitation addresses the limitations of independence and can serve the unifying aim of enhancing the person’s quality of life. These goals apply equally to motor disabilities and the cognitive and behavioural effects of injuries which affect personal and work relationships.

Conclusions:

Rehabilitation is likely to be more effective if it aims at a combination of independence, autonomy and social engagement, in service of the goal of a good quality of life.

Keywords

Independence autonomy social engagement quality of life functioning effectively

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dunn

DS.

The social psychology of disability. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Brain Injury association of America. Treatment. https://www.biausa.org/brain-injury/about-brain-injury/treatment (accessed 21 June 2017).

Irdesel

Aydiner

Akgoz

Rehabilitation outcome after traumatic brain injury. Neurocirugía 2007; 18(1): 5–15.

Johns Hopkins Medicine. Traumatic brain injury. http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/healthlibrary/conditions/physical_medicine_and_rehabilitation/acquired_brain_injury_85,P01145/. (accessed 21 December 2016).

Cardol

De Jong

Ward

CD.

On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehab 2002; 24(18): 970–974.

Gawande

Being mortal: illness, medicine, and what matters in the end. London: Welcome Collection, 2015.

Barnes

Independent living, politics and policy in the United Kingdom: a social model account. Rev Disab Stud 2014; 1: 4.

Gibson

BE.

Rehabilitation: a post-critical approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2016.

Gibson

BE.

Parallels and problems of normalization in rehabilitation and universal design: enabling connectivities. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36(16): 1328–1233.

10.

DeJong

Independent living: from social movement to analytic paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 435–446.

11.

Hoofien

Gilboa

Vakil

, et al. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10-20years later: a comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Inj 2001; 15(3): 189–209.

12.

Barskova

Wilz

Interdependence of stroke survivors’ recovery and their relatives’ attitudes and health: a contribution to investigating the causal effects. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(19): 1481–1491.

13.

Wrosch

Scheier

Miller

, et al. Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being. Pers Soc Psychol B 2003; 29: 1494–1508.

14.

Hilberink

Cardol

Agency in the twenty-first century: the emperor’s new clothes. Disab Soc 2013; 28(4): 569–573.

15.

Kreutzer

Rapport

Marwitz

, et al. Caregivers’ well-being after traumatic brain injury: a multi-center investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 939–946.

16.

Tanielian

Jaycox

(eds). Invisible wounds of war: psychological and cognitive injuries, their consequences, and services to assist recovery. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2008.

17.

Agich

GJ.

Dependence and autonomy in old age: an ethical framework for long-term care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

18.

Marin

Wilkosz

PA.

Disorders of diminished motivation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2005; 20(4): 377–388.

19.

Sim

Respect for autonomy: issues in neurological rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12(1): 3–10.

20.

Harvey

Theorising everyday life after acquired brain injury. Disabil Soc 2018; 33(1): 78–93.

21.

Remnant

Adams

The nutritional content and cost of supermarket ready-meals. cross-sectional analysis. Appetite 2015; 92: 36–42.

22.

Esser

Palme

Do public pensions matter for health and wellbeing among retired persons? Basic and income security pensions across 13 Western European countries. Int J Soc Welf 2010; 19(S1): 5103–5120.

23.

Wadeson

The division of labour under uncertainty. J Inst Theor Econ 2013; 169: 253–274.

24.

Clapton

Kendall

Autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Time for a new paradigm?

Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(18): 987–991.

25.

Van Lange

PAM

Balliet

. Interdependence theory. In: Mikulincer

Shaver

(eds) The APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations. Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association, 2015.

26.

Condeluci

Interdependence: the route to community. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press,1998.

27.

Meyer

Park

Grenot-Scheyer

, et al. (eds). Making friends: the influences of culture and development. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes, 1998.

28.

Haas

Gawande

Reynolds

ME.

The risk to patient safety from health system expansions. JAMA 2018; 319(17): 1765–1766.

29.

Williams

Mewse

Tonks

, et al. Traumatic brain injury in a prison population: prevalence and risk for re-offending. Brain Inj 2010; 24(10): 1184–1188.

30.

Conly

Against autonomy: justifying coercive paternalism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

31.

White

Simpson

Gonda

, et al. Moving form independence to interdependence: a conceptual model for better understanding community participation of centers for independent living consumers. J Disabil Policy Stu 2010; 20(4): 233–240.

32.

Gooden-Ledbetter

Cole

Maher

, et al. Self-efficacy and interdependence as predictors of life satisfaction for people with disabilities: implications for independent living programs. J Vocat Rehabil 2007; 27(3): 153–161.

33.

Sadaah

MA.

On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(18): 977–982.

34.

Leopold

Krueger

dal Monte

, et al. Damage to the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex impacts affective theory of mind. Soc Cogn Affect Neur 2012; 7(8): 871–880.

35.

Corrigan

PW.

How stigma interferes with mental health care. Am Psychol 2004; 59(7): 614–625.

36.

Krahn

Traumatic brain injury and the use of documentary narrative media to redress social stigma. In: Clausen

Levy

(eds) Handbook of neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015, pp.1501–1524.

37.

Swift

Wilson

SL.

Misconceptions about brain injury among the general public and non-expert health professionals: an exploratory study. Brain Inj 2001; 15: 149–165.

38.

Block

West

Goldin

Misconceptions and misattributions about traumatic brain injury: an integrated conceptual framework. Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 8(1): 58–68.

39.

McClure

The role of causal attributions in public misconceptions about brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 2011; 56: 85–93.

40.

McClure

Devlin

McDowall

, et al. Visible markers of brain injury influence attributions for adolescents’ behaviour. Brain Inj 2006; 20(10): 1029–1035.

41.

McClure

Buchanan

McDowall

, et al. Attributions for behaviours of persons with brain injury: the role of perceived severity and time since injury. Brain Inj 2008; 22: 639–648.

42.

Rusch

Chadsey-Rusch

Johnson

JR.

Supported employment: emerging opportunities for employment integration. In: LH

Meyer

Peck

Brown

(eds), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, 1991, pp.145–169.

43.

Wyse

Pogoda

Mastarone

, et al. Employment and vocational rehabilitation experiences among veterans with polytrauma/traumatic brain injury history. Psychol Serv 2020; 17(1): 65–74.

44.

Seitz

Nickel

Azari

NP.

Functional modularity of the medial prefrontal cortex: involvement in human empathy. Neuropsychology 2006; 20(6): 743–751.

45.

Temkin

Corrigan

Dikmen

, et al. Social functioning after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010; 26(6): 460–467.

46.

Chesnel

Jourdan

Bayen

, et al. Self-awareness four years after severe traumatic brain injury: discordance between the patient’s and relative’s complaints. Results from the PariS-TBI study. Clin Rehabil 2018; 32(5): 692–704.

47.

Siegert

Ward

Levack

WMM

, et al. A good lives model of clinical and community rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1604–1615.

48.

Triandis

HC.

Individualism-collectivism and personality. J Pers 2001; 69(6): 907–924.

49.

Bodhit

Patel

Daneshvar

, et al. How much does a traumatic brain injury cost? Neurology 2014; 82: 10.

50.

Wade

Rehabilitation – a new approach. Part two: the underlying theories. Clin Rehabil 2015; 29(12): 1145–1154.

51.

Steadman-Pare

Colantonio

Ratcliff

, et al. Factors associated with perceived quality of life many years after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2001; 16(4): 330–342.

52.

Diener

Oishi

Tay

Advances in subjective well-being research. Nat Hum Behav 2018; 2: 253–260.

53.

Putnam

RD.

Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.

54.

McClure

A day in the life of brain injury: living in two worlds. Manuscript in preparation, Victoria University of Wellington, 2020.