The future of rehabilitation in the United Kingdom National Health Service: Using the COVID-19 crisis to promote change,increasing efficiency and effectiveness

Abstract

The problem:

Rehabilitation services in the UK are inadequate, with insufficient capacity or flexibility to meet the needs of patients after Covid-19.

History:

Rehabilitation developed in a piecemeal way, focused on specific problems: spinal cord injury, burns, polio, stroke, back pain, equipment and adaptations etc. Rehabilitation is also provided using other names (e.g. intermediate care). Patients with complex needs do not fit easily within this system.

System failure:

After Covid-19, patients have problems that cross existing condition-specific and/or treatment-specific services. Covid-19 has exposed the lack of any coherent organisational principle underlying development or commissioning of rehabilitation services. Consequently, in order to have their needs met, patients either have to engage with two or more separate services or they receive good management for some problems and sub-optimal management for other problems.

The goals:

The multitude of small specific services need to coalesce into an integrated service able to meet all the needs of any patient referred. Second, rehabilitation needs to be fully integrated into all healthcare services.

A solution:

The purpose of healthcare is to ‘improve our health and well-being . . . to stay as well as we can to the end of our lives’. (NHS constitution) All healthcare services need to consider patients holistically, giving equal attention to disease, disability, and distress. Rehabilitation, acute care, mental health and palliative care services need to work in parallel to achieve this purpose. Healthcare providers, supported by commissioners and rehabilitation experts, could achieve structural and organisational change, meeting the needs of patients.

Keywords

Covid-19 rehabilitation health organisation purpose

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Metzl

Maybank

Maio

FD.

Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic: the need for a structurally competent health care system. JAMA 2020; 324: 231–232. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2767027.

Volpp

Diamond

Shrank

WH.

Innovation in home care: time for a new payment model. JAMA 2020; 323: 2474–2475. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766559.

Berwick

DM.

Choices for the “new normal”. JAMA 2020; 323: 2125–2126. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2765699.

Hollander

Sites

FD.

The transition from reimagining to recreating health care is now. NEJM Catal 2020; 1(2). https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0093.

Wade

DT.

Rehabilitation after COVID-19: an evidence-based approach. Clin Med 2020; 20: 359–365.

British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. Rehabilitation in the wake of Covid-19. A phoenix from the ashes, https://www.bsrm.org.uk/downloads/covid-19bsrmissue1-published-27-4-2020.pdf.

Ahmed

Patel

Greenwood

, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of coronavirus outbreaks after hospitalisation or ICU admission: a systematic review and meta-analysis of follow-up studies. Infect Dis (except HIV/AIDS) 2020. http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2020.04.16.20067975.

NHS-England. After-care needs of inpatients recovering from COVID-19, https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/publication/after-care-needs-of-inpatients-recovering-from-covid-19/.

Rubin

As their numbers grow, COVID-19 “long haulers” stump experts [Internet]. JAMA. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2771111 (accessed 23 September 2020).

10.

Head Injury. Triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults. NICE Clin Guideline 56, http://publications.nice.org.uk/head-injury-cg56.

11.

National audit of services for people with multiple sclerosis 2008. London: The Multiple Sclerosis Audit Steering Group Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, 2008. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/national-audit-services-people-multiple-sclerosis-2011-reports.

12.

Audit commission update 2002 fully equipped. Assisting independence, 2002.

13.

Treadgold

Kennedy

Spoudeas

, et al. Paediatric neuro-oncology rehabilitation in the UK: carer and provider perspectives. BMJ Paediatr Open 2019; 3(1): e000567.

14.

Wade

DT.

Rehabilitation – a new approach: overview and part one: the problems. Clin Rehab 2015; 29: 1041–1050.

15.

NHS. Specialised rehabilitation for patients with highly complex needs (all ages). England: NHS. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/d02-rehab-pat-high-needs-0414.pdf.

16.

NHS. Specialist rehabilitation following major injury (NCASRI). Final audit report, NHS, London, North West University Healthcare, NHS Trust, April 2019. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/cicelysaunders/about/rehabilitation/nhs-audit-report-v9-rgb.pdf.

17.

Singh

Sinha

Bill

, et al. Unmet need for specialised rehabilitation following neurosurgery: can we maximise the potential cost–benefits? Br J Neurosurg 2017; 31(2): 249–253.

18.

Mayer

Prosperity. Better business makes the greater good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. ISBN: 978-0-19-882400-8.

19.

Wade

Halligan

PW.

Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems?

Br Med J 2004; 329: 1398–1401. http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/329/7479/1398.

20.

Wade

Halligan

PW.

The biopsychosocial model of illness: a model whose time has come. Clin Rehab 2017; 31: 995–1004.

21.

Terlouw

TJA

. Roots of physical medicine, physical therapy, and mechanotherapy in the Netherlands in the 19th century: a disputed area within the healthcare domain. J Man Manip Ther 2007; 15(2): E23–E41.

22.

Pöstges

Physical therapy at bath war hospital: rehabilitation and its links to WWI. J Human Rehab 2019; 11. https://www.jhrehab.org/2019/04/15/physical-therapy-at-bath-war-hospital-rehabilitation-and-its-links-to-ww1/.

23.

Guyatt

Better

Artificial limbs for British veterans of the first world war. J Design Hist 2001; 14(4): 307–325.

24.

Houses of Parliament. Mr M Macdonald Written answer to a question. Hansard, 1940. https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1940-08-01/debates/6712cf2f-d4b8-4b8f-9aad-f6c3a5241bf6/WrittenAnswers.

25.

Clarke

AK.

‘Physical disability in 1986 and beyond’: a review of the RCP report. Br J Occup Ther 1988; 51: 127–129.

26.

Engel

. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129–136.

27.

World Health Organisation. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1980. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/41003/1/9241541261_eng.pdf (accessed 18 March 2017).

28.

World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning. https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.

29.

NCEPOD. Trauma: Who cares? A report of the national confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death, 2007, http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2007report2/Downloads/SIP_report.pdf.

30.

NHS Clinical Advisory Groups. Regional networks for major trauma. NHS clinical advisory groups report, https://www.uhs.nhs.uk/Media/SUHTInternet/Services/Emergencymedicine/Regionalnetworksformajortrauma.pdf (2010, accessed 17 June 2020).

31.

Turner-Stokes

Bavikatte

Williams

, et al. Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis. BMJ Open 2016; 6(9): e012112.

32.

Turner-Stokes

Williams

Bill

, et al. Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for working-aged adults with complex neurological disabilities: a multicentre cohort analysis of a national clinical data set. BMJ Open 2016; 6(2): e010238.

33.

UK rehabilitation outcome collaborative, https://www.kcl.ac.uk/cicelysaunders/research/studies/uk-roc.

34.

Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. BMJ 1997; 314: 1151–1159.

35.

Wade

DT.

What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. Clin Rehab 2020; 34: 571–583.

36.

Brusco

Taylor

Watts

, et al. Economic evaluation of adult rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in a variety of settings. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2014; 95(1): 94–116, e4.

37.

Shields

Wells

Doherty

, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. Heart 2018; 104(17): 1403–1410.

38.

Wade

DT.

A teamwork approach to neurological rehabilitation. In: Dietz

Ward

(eds) Oxford textbook on neurorehabilitation, Chapter two. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, pp.9–22. ISBN 978-0-19-882495-4.

39.

Wade

DT.

What attributes should a specialist in rehabilitation have? Seven suggested specialist capabilities in practice. Clin Rehab 2020; 34. DOI: 10.1177/0269215520925869.

40.

NICE Guideline NG74. Intermediate care including reablement. Full guideline, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng74/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-4600707949 https://www.nice.org.uk/about/nice-communities/social-care/quick-guides/understanding-intermediate-care (September 2017).

41.

Ariss

Enderby

Smith

, et al. Secondary analysis and literature review of community rehabilitation and intermediate care: an information resource. Health Serv Deliv Res 2015; 3(1): 1–180.

42.

Commissioning specialised services, https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec-services/.

43.

Securing equity and excellence in commissioning specialised services, https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/op-model.pdf.

44.

Langhorne

Ramachandra

Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 4: CD000197.

45.

Halpin

McIvor

Whyatt

, et al. Post-discharge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol. Epub ahead of print July 30, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26368.

46.

Greenhalgh

Knight

A’Court

, et al. Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care. BMJ 2020; 370: m3026.

47.

Cottrell

Galea

O’Leary

, et al. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehab 2019; 31: 625–638.

48.

Appleby

Gill

Hayes

, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the management of adults with stroke: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 2019; 14(11): e0225150.

49.

Wade

DT.

Rehabilitation – a new approach. Part four: a new paradigm, and its implications. Clin Rehab 2016; 30: 109–118.

50.

Tipping

Harrold

Holland

, et al. The effects of active mobilisation and rehabilitation in ICU on mortality and function: a systematic review. Intens Care Med (Heidelberg) 2017; 43(2): 171–183.

51.

Zang

Chen

Wang

, et al. The effect of early mobilization in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Nurs Crit Care 2019; 1–8. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nicc.12455.

52.

Bond-Smith

Belgaumkar

Davidson

, et al. Enhanced recovery protocols for major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2: CD011382.

53.

Langhorne

Collier

Bate

, et al. Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10: CD006187.

54.

Hughes

Hackney

Lamb

, et al. Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2019; 43(7): 1661–1668.

55.

The NHS Constitution for England. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-nhs-constitution-for-england (2012).

56.

DeVoe

JE.

The incompatibility of patient-centred care with fee-for-service payment. JAMA Intern Med. Epub ahead of print September 28, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4341.

57.

Huber

Knottnerus

Green

, et al. How should we define health? BMJ 2011; 343: d4163–d4163.