Supervised physical therapy versus unsupervised exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the 1-year outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with supervised physical therapy or unsupervised exercise.

Design:

A single-center randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor and intention-to-treat analysis.

Setting:

Spine care center.

Subjects:

A total of 86 patients presenting with symptoms of neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis.

Interventions:

The physical therapy group received supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 6 weeks and home exercise program. The home exercise group received 6-week home exercise program only.

Main measures:

The primary outcome was symptom severity on the Zurich claudication questionnaire at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included physical function, pain, health-related quality of life and the surgery rate after 1 year.

Results:

At 1 year, more patients in the physical therapy group than in the home exercise group achieved minimum clinically important differences in Zurich claudication questionnaire symptom severity (60.5% vs 32.6%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.3, [95% CI [1.5–12.3], P = 0.01); Zurich claudication questionnaire physical function (55.8% vs 32.6%; AOR 3.0 [1.1–8.1], P = 0.03); SF-36 bodily pain (48.8% vs 25.6%; AOR 2.8 [1.1–7.3], P = 0.03), and SF-36 general health (20.9% vs 7.0%; AOR 6.1 [1.1–33.0], P = 0.04). The surgery rate at 1 year was lower in the physical therapy than in the home exercise group (7.0% vs 23.3%; AOR 0.2 [0.04–0.9] P = 0.04).

Conclusions:

Supervised physical therapy produced greater improvements in symptom severity and physical function than unsupervised exercise and was associated with lower likelihood of receiving surgery within 1 year.

Keywords

lumbar spinal stenosis intermittent claudication Physical Therapy Exercise surgery rate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Minetama

Kawakami

Teraguchi

, et al. Supervised physical therapy vs. home exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J 2019; 19: 1310–1318.

Macedo

Hum

Kuleba

, et al. Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2013; 93: 1646–1660.

Whitman

Flynn

Childs

, et al. A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis—a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2006; 31: 2541–2549.

Ammendolia

Côté

Southerst

, et al. Comprehensive nonsurgical treatment versus self-directed care to improve walking ability in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99: 2408–2419.

Katz

Harris

MB.

Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 818–825.

Delitto

Piva

Moore

, et al. Surgery versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162: 465–473.

Fritz

Lurie

Zhao

, et al. Associations between physical therapy and long-term outcomes for individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis in the SPORT study. Spine J 2014; 14: 1611–1621.

Hara

Matsudara

Tohnosu

, et al. Psychometric assessment of the Japanese version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ): reliability and validity. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0160183.

Jensen

Turner

Romano

, et al. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 1999; 83: 157–162.

10.

Fukui

Chiba

Kawakami

, et al. Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale. J Orthop Sci 2008; 13: 173–179.

11.

Fukuhara

Ware

Kosinski

, et al. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1045–1053.

12.

Zigmond

Snaith

RP.

Hospital anxiety and depression scale. Seishinkashindangaku 1993; 4: 371–372 (in Japanese).

13.

Matsuoka

Sakano

Assessment of cognitive aspect of pain: development, reliability, and validation of Japanese version of pain catastrophizing scale. Shinshinigaku 2007; 47: 95–102 (in Japanese).

14.

Matsuoka

Sakano

Development and validation of Japanese version of pain anxiety symptoms scale-20. Koudouigakukenkyu 2008; 14: 1–7 (in Japanese).

15.

Kikuchi

Matsudaira

Sawada

, et al. Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-J) in patients with whiplash neck injury pain and/or low back pain. J Orthop Sci 2015; 20: 985–992.

16.

Tomkins

Battié

Rogers

, et al. A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol. Spine 2009; 34: 2444–2449.

17.

Schizas

Theumann

Burn

, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine 2010; 35: 1919–1924.

18.

Cleland

Whitman

Houser

, et al. Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 2012; 12: 921–931.

19.

Minetama

Miyake

Moriki

, et al. Multimodal assessments of effectiveness of physical therapy for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. J J Physiother Exercise 2016; 2(1): 016.

20.

Minetama

Kawakami

Nakagawa

, et al. A comparative study of 2-year follow-up outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with physical therapy alone and those with surgical intervention after less successful physical therapy. J Orthop Sci 2018; 23: 470–476.

21.

Schneider

Ammendolia

Murphy

, et al. Comparative clinical effectiveness of nonsurgical treatment methods in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2: e186828.

22.

Kasai

Fukui

Takahashi

, et al. Verification of the sensitivity of functional scores for treatment results – Substantial clinical benefit thresholds for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). J Orthop Sci 2017; 22: 665–669.

23.

Walsh

Srinathan

McAuley

, et al. The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 622–628.

24.

Watters

Baisden

Gilbert

, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 2008; 8: 305–310.

25.

Kitano

Kawakami

Fukui

, et al. Preoperative psychological factors affecting surgical satisfaction of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop Sci 2020; 25: 751–756.

26.

Burgstaller

Wertli

Steurer

, et al. The influence of pre- and postoperative fear avoidance beliefs on postoperative pain and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data. Spine 2017; 42: E425–E432.

27.

Evaniew

Files

Smith

, et al. The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in spine surgery: a systematic survey. Spine J 2015; 15: 2188–2197.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.12 MB