Effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness and exercise capacity for incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2023
Effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness and exercise capacity for incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
To determine the effects of robotic-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness and exercise capacity for people with incomplete spinal cord injury.
Methods
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PEDro, CENTRAL and CINAHL were searched from inception until September 4, 2022. Randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of robotic-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness and exercise capacity for individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury were selected. Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The methodological quality was evaluated by the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the time since injury.
Results
In total 19 studies involving 770 patients were eligible for analysis. Individuals with acute incomplete spinal cord injury in robotic-assisted gait training groups showed significantly greater improvements in 6-minute walking test (MD 53.32; 95% CI 33.49 to 73.15; P < 0.001), lower extremity motor scale (MD 5.22; 95% CI 3.63 to 6.80; P < 0.001) and walking index for spinal cord injury II (MD 3.18; 95% CI 1.34 to 5.02; P < 0.001). Robotic-assisted gait training improved peak oxygen consumption to a greater degree for chronic incomplete spinal cord injury patients (MD 4.90; 95% CI 0.96 to 8.84; P = 0.01).
Conclusion
Robot-assisted gait training may be a feasible and effective intervention in terms of cardiopulmonary fitness and exercise capacity for individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.
O'SheaTMBurdaJESofroniewMV. Cell biology of spinal cord injury and repair. J Clin Invest2017; 127: 3259–3270.
2.
AnjumAYazidMDFauzi DaudM, et al.Spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, multimolecular interactions, and underlying recovery mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci2020; 21. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207533
3.
JamesSLTheadomAEllenbogenRG, et al.Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol2019; 18: 56–87.
4.
BuzzellAChamberlainJDEriks-HooglandI, et al.All-cause and cause-specific mortality following non-traumatic spinal cord injury: evidence from a population-based cohort study in Switzerland. Spinal Cord2020; 58: 157–164.
5.
ChamberlainJDBuzzellAGmünderHP, et al.Comparison of all-cause and cause-specific mortality of persons with traumatic spinal cord injuries to the general Swiss population: results from a National Cohort Study. Neuroepidemiology2019; 52: 205–213.
6.
MirzaevaLLobzinSTcinzerlingN, et al.Complications and mortality after acute traumatic spinal cord injury in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Spinal Cord2020; 58: 970–979.
7.
MajdanMPlancikovaDNemcovskaE, et al.Mortality due to traumatic spinal cord injuries in Europe: a cross-sectional and pooled analysis of population-wide data from 22 countries. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med2017; 25: 64.
8.
GrigoreanVTSanduAMPopescuM, et al.Cardiac dysfunctions following spinal cord injury. J Med Life2009; 2: 133–145.
9.
DitunnoPLPatrickMStinemanM, et al.Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord2008; 46: 500–506.
10.
van der ScheerJWMartin GinisKADitorDS, et al.Effects of exercise on fitness and health of adults with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Neurology2017; 89: 736–745.
11.
NashMS. Exercise as a health-promoting activity following spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther2005; 29: 87–103.
12.
NoreauLShephardRJSimardC, et al.Relationship of impairment and functional ability to habitual activity and fitness following spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabilit Res1993; 16: 265–275.
13.
MyersJLeeMKiratliJ. Cardiovascular disease in spinal cord injury: an overview of prevalence, risk, evaluation, and management. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2007; 86: 142–152.
14.
MahootiFRahebGAlipourF, et al.Psychosocial challenges of social reintegration for people with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Spinal Cord2020; 58: 1119–1127.
15.
RahimiMTorkamanGGhabaeeM, et al.Advanced weight-bearing mat exercises combined with functional electrical stimulation to improve the ability of wheelchair-dependent people with spinal cord injury to transfer and attain independence in activities of daily living: a randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord2020; 58: 78–85.
16.
NevilleBTMurrayDRosenKB, et al.Effects of performance-based training on gait and balance in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2019; 100: 1888–1893.
17.
LiuHLiJDuL, et al.Short-term effects of core stability training on the balance and ambulation function of individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Minerva Med2019; 110: 216–223.
18.
LemosJRda CunhaFALopesAJ, et al.Respiratory muscle training in non-athletes and athletes with spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the effects on pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength and endurance, and cardiorespiratory fitness based on the FITT principle of exercise prescription. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2020; 33: 655–667.
19.
GaffuriniPBissolottiLCalzaS, et al.Energy metabolism during activity-promoting video games practice in subjects with spinal cord injury: evidences for health promotion. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2013; 49: 23–29.
20.
SaundersDHSandersonMHayesS, et al.Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2020; 3: Cd003316.
21.
BossersWJvan der WoudeLHBoersmaF, et al.A 9-week aerobic and strength training program improves cognitive and motor function in patients with dementia: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Geriat Psychiat2015; 23: 1106–1116.
22.
AngeliCABoakyeMMortonRA, et al.Recovery of over-ground walking after chronic motor complete spinal cord injury. N Engl J Med2018; 379: 1244–1250.
23.
EasthopeCSTrainiLRAwaiL, et al.Overground walking patterns after chronic incomplete spinal cord injury show distinct response patterns to unloading. J Neuroeng Rehabil2018; 15: 102.
24.
MehrholzJHarveyLAThomasS, et al.Is body-weight-supported treadmill training or robotic-assisted gait training superior to overground gait training and other forms of physiotherapy in people with spinal cord injury? A systematic review. Spinal Cord2017; 55: 722–729.
25.
KimHYShinJHYangSP, et al.Robot-assisted gait training for balance and lower extremity function in patients with infratentorial stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil2019; 16: 99.
26.
CheungEYYNgTKWYuKKK, et al.Robot-assisted training for people with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2017; 98: 2320–2331.e2312.
27.
EsquenaziAPackelA. Robotic-assisted gait training and restoration. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2012; 91: S217–S227; quiz S228–S231.
28.
GormanPHScottWVanHielL, et al.Comparison of peak oxygen consumption response to aquatic and robotic therapy in individuals with chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord2019; 57: 471–481.
29.
GormanPHScottWYorkH, et al.Robotically assisted treadmill exercise training for improving peak fitness in chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. J Spinal Cord Med2016; 39: 32–44.
30.
KresslerJNashMSBurnsPA, et al.Metabolic responses to 4 different body weight-supported locomotor training approaches in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2013; 94: 1436–1442.
31.
AlashramARAnninoGPaduaE. Robot-assisted gait training in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review for the clinical effectiveness of Lokomat. J Clin Neurosci2021; 91: 260–269.
32.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ2009; 339: b2535.
33.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ2021; 10: 1–11. DOI:10.1136/bmj.n71
34.
SterneJACSavovićJPageMJ, et al.Rob 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ2019; 366: 14898.
35.
Alcobendas-MaestroMEsclarín-RuzACasado-LópezRM, et al.Lokomat robotic-assisted versus overground training within 3 to 6 months of incomplete spinal cord lesion: randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2012; 26: 1058–1063.
36.
ChangSHAfzalTBerlinerJ, et al.Exoskeleton-assisted gait training to improve gait in individuals with spinal cord injury: a pilot randomized study. Pilot Feasibility Stud2018; 4: 62.
37.
CheungEYYYuKKKKwanRLC, et al.Effect of EMG-biofeedback robotic-assisted body weight supported treadmill training on walking ability and cardiopulmonary function on people with subacute spinal cord injuries—a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol2019; 19: 140.
38.
DuffellLDBrownGLMirbagheriMM. Interventions to reduce spasticity and improve function in people with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: distinctions revealed by different analytical methods. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2015; 29: 566–576.
39.
Esclarín-RuzAAlcobendas-MaestroMCasado-LopezR, et al.A comparison of robotic walking therapy and conventional walking therapy in individuals with upper versus lower motor neuron lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2014; 95: 1023–1031.
40.
EvansRWShackletonCLWestS, et al.Robotic locomotor training leads to cardiovascular changes in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury over a 24-week rehabilitation period: a randomized controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2021; 102: 1447–1456.
41.
Field-FoteECRoachKE. Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther2011; 91: 48–60.
42.
HornbyTGCampbellDDZemonDH, et al.Clinical and quantitative evaluation of robotic-assisted treadmill walking to retrain ambulation after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil2005; 11: 1–17.
43.
LamTPauhlKFergusonA, et al.Training with robot-applied resistance in people with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury: pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev2015; 52: 113–129.
44.
MıdıkMPakerNBuğdaycıD, et al.Effects of robot-assisted gait training on lower extremity strength, functional independence, and walking function in men with incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury. Turk J Phys Med Rehabilit2020; 66: 54–59.
45.
MirbagheriMMKindigMWNiuX. Effects of robotic-locomotor training on stretch reflex function and muscular properties in individuals with spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol2015; 126: 997–1006.
46.
NiuXVaroquiDKindigM, et al.Prediction of gait recovery in spinal cord injured individuals trained with robotic gait orthosis. J Neuroeng Rehabil2014; 11: 42.
47.
NooijenCFTer HoeveNField-FoteEC. Gait quality is improved by locomotor training in individuals with SCI regardless of training approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil2009; 6: 36.
48.
PiiraALannemAMSørensenM, et al.Robot-assisted locomotor training did not improve walking function in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Med2019; 51: 385–389.
49.
ShinJCKimJYParkHK, et al.Effect of robotic-assisted gait training in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Ann Rehabil Med2014; 38: 719–725.
50.
VaroquiDNiuXMirbagheriMM. Ankle voluntary movement enhancement 385 following robotic-assisted locomotor training in spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil2014; 11: 46.
51.
DuanRQuMYuanY, et al.Clinical benefit of rehabilitation training in spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine2021; 46: E398–E410.
52.
Aguirre-GüemezAVPérez-SanpabloAIQuinzaños-FresnedoJ, et al.Walking speed is not the best outcome to evaluate the effect of robotic assisted gait training in people with motor incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Spinal Cord Med2019; 42: 142–154.
53.
FangCYTsaiJLLiGS, et al.Effects of robot-assisted gait training in individuals with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. BioMed Res Int2020; 2020: 2102785.
54.
KimCMEngJJWhittakerMW. Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: relationship with muscle strength. Spinal Cord2004; 42: 156–162.
55.
Pérez-SanpabloAIQuinzaños-FresnedoJLoera-CruzR, et al.Validation of the instrumented evaluation of spatio-temporal gait parameters in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord2017; 55: 699–704.
56.
EscalonaMJBrosseauRVermetteM, et al.Cardiorespiratory demand and rate of perceived exertion during overground walking with a robotic exoskeleton in long-term manual wheelchair users with chronic spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2018; 61: 215–223.
57.
GarberCEBlissmerBDeschenesMR, et al.American College of Sports Medicine 409 position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exercise2011; 43: 1334–1359.
58.
HutsonTHDi GiovanniS. The translational landscape in spinal cord injury: focus on neuroplasticity and regeneration. Nat Rev Neurol2019; 15: 732–745.
59.
SmithACKnikouM. A review on locomotor training after spinal cord injury: reorganization of spinal neuronal circuits and recovery of motor function. Neural Plast2016; 2016: 1216258.
60.
FouadKKrajacicATetzlaffW. Spinal cord injury and plasticity: opportunities and challenges. Brain Res Bull2011; 84: 337–342.
61.
NorrieBANevett-DuchchererJMGorassiniMA. Reduced functional recovery by delaying motor training after spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol2005; 94: 255–264.
