Effect of a transitional tele-rehabilitation programme on quality of life of adult burn survivors: A randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Objective

To examine the effects of the transitional tele-rehabilitation programme on quality of life of adult burn survivors.

Design

A prospective, single centre, randomised controlled trial and reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.

Participants

Adult burn survivors aged ≥18 years with burn size ≥10% total body surface area irrespective of the depth was considered eligible to participate.

Intervention

The intervention was in two phases: pre-discharge and active follow-up phase (which occurred via WeChat). In both phases, comprehensive assessment and intervention guided by the Omaha System and evidenced-based protocols guided the care delivery over an 8-week period.

Main measures

The outcome of interest was quality of life. Two outcome measures were used to assess the outcome of interest: Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) and the EQ-5D-5L tools. The outcome was assessed at three time points: T0 (baseline), T1 (immediate post-intervention) and T2 (4 weeks from T1).

Results

In total, 60 adult burn survivors were randomly allocated to undergo the new programme. The transitional tele-rehabilitation programme elicited statistically significant improvement in simple abilities, affect, interpersonal relationship (T2) and overall quality life (T1 and T2) measured on the BSHS-B.

Conclusion

Ongoing rehabilitative care is essential to support the recovery process of burn survivors considering that some quality-of-life subscales may improve faster than others. The study findings highlight the potential of employing a social media platform to improve post-burn quality of life outcomes.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT04517721. Registered on 20 August 2020

Keywords

Aftercare burns Omaha System tele-rehabilitation transitional care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

El Khatib

Jeschke

. Contemporary aspects of burn care. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 57: 386.

Liang

Wang

Yao

, et al. Predictors of health-care needs in discharged burn patients. Burns 2012; 38: 172–179.

Reeve

James

McNeill

, et al. Functional and psychological outcomes following burn injury: reduced income and hidden emotions are predictors of greater distress. J Burn Care Res 2011; 32: 468–474.

Wikehult

Willebrand

Kildal

, et al. Use of healthcare a long time after severe burn injury; relation to perceived health and personality characteristics. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 863–870.

Fauerbach

Lezotte

Hills

, et al. The 2004 Clinical Research Award: burden of burn: a norm-based inquiry into the influence of burn size and distress on recovery of physical and psychosocial function. J Burn Care Rehabil 2005; 26: 21–32.

Spronk

Van Loey

Sewalt

, et al. Quality of life study group. Recovery of health-related quality of life after burn injuries: an individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0226653.

Moi

Haugsmyr

Heisterkamp

. Long-term study of health and quality of life after burn injury. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2016; 29: 295.

Bayuo

Wong

, et al. Adult burn survivors and burn care staff perceptions regarding transitioning from the burn unit: a cross-country qualitative study in Ghana and China. Qual Health Res 2024. 10497323231224378.

Schulz

Altman

Moher

. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharm Pharmacotherapeutics 2010; 1: 100–107.

10.

Martin

Monsen

Bowles

. The Omaha system and meaningful use: applications for practice, education, and research. CIN: Comput, Inform, Nursing 2011; 29: 52–58.

11.

Bayuo

Wong

Agyei

. “On the recovery journey:” an integrative review of the needs of burn patients from immediate pre-discharge to post-discharge period using the Omaha System. J Nurs Scholarsh 2020; 52: 360–368.

12.

Bayuo

Wong

FKY

Chung

LYF

. Effects of a nurse-led transitional burns rehabilitation programme (4Cs-TBuRP) for adult burn survivors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22: 1–15.

13.

Ling-Juan

Jie

Jian

, et al. Development of quality of life scale in Chinese burn patients: cross-cultural adaptation process of burn-specific health scale – brief. Burns 2012; 38: 1216–1223.

14.

Kvannli

Finlay

Edgar

, et al.

Using the burn specific health scale-brief as a 28 measure of quality of life after a burn—what score should clinicians expect?

Burns 2011; 37: 54–60.

15.

Elsherbiny

El Fahar

Weheida

, et al. Effect of burn rehabilitation program on improving quality of life (QoL) for hand burns patients: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Plast Surg 2018; 41: 451–458.

16.

Grisbrook

Reid

Edgar

, et al. Exercise training to improve health related quality of life in long term survivors of major burn injury: a matched controlled study. Burns 2012; 38: 1165–1173.

17.

Jakobsen

Gluud

Wetterslev

, et al. When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017; 17: 1–10.

18.

lsherbiny

El Fahar

Weheida

, et al. Effect of burn rehabilitation program on improving quality of life (QoL) for hand burns patients: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Plast Surg 2018; 41: 451–458.

19.

Gautam

Rajoura

Sharma

, et al. Socio-demographic features and quality of life post burn injury. J Family Med Prim Care 2022; 11: 1032.

20.

Waqas

Turk

Naveed

, et al. Perceived social support among patients with burn injuries: a perspective from the developing world. Burns 2018; 44: 168–174.

21.

Chou

RJ-A

. Filial piety by contract? The emergence, implementation, and implications of the “family support agreement” in China. Gerontologist 2011; 51: 3–16.

22.

Rouzfarakh

Deldar

Froutan

, et al. The effect of rehabilitation education through social media on the quality of life in burn patients: a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21: 1–11.

23.

Heydarikhayat

Ashktorab

Rohani

, et al. Effect of post-hospital discharge follow-up on health status in patients with burn injuries: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 2018; 6: 293.

24.

Hsu

K-C

Chen

Y-C

, et al. Differences in parent-perceived and patient-reported quality of life among young adult burn patients: a prospective longitudinal study. Burns 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.02.020

25.

WeChat Help Center. https://help.wechat.com/cgi-bin/micromsg-bin/oshelpcenter?opcode=2&plat=1&lang=en&id=1208117b2mai1410243yyQFZ&Channel=helpcenter (Accessed on 17^th January 2024).

26.

Wallis

Blessing

Dalwai

, et al. Integrating mHealth at point of care in low- and middle-income settings: the system perspective. Glob Health Action 2017; 10: 1327686.

27.

Klingberg

Sawe

Hammar

, et al. m-Health for burn injury consultations in a low-resource setting: an acceptability study among health care providers. Telemed e-Health 2020; 26: 395–405.