Problematic smartphone use as a modifiable factor in cervicogenic headache: Effects on pain,function,mood,and sleep

Abstract

Objective

To examine whether problematic smartphone use is associated with pain intensity, functional disability, emotional distress, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life in individuals with cervicogenic headache compared with healthy adults.

Design

Case–control study.

Setting

Outpatient clinics of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurology at a university hospital.

Participants

A total of 158 adults, including 78 individuals diagnosed with cervicogenic headache and 80 age- and sex-matched healthy controls.

Main measures

Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Form, Headache Impact Test-6, Neck Disability Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Jenkins Sleep Scale, and Short Form-12 Health Survey.

Results

Individuals with cervicogenic headache reported significantly higher levels of smartphone-related behavioural problems, headache impact, neck-related disability, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep disturbance than healthy controls (all p < 0.05). Physical and mental health-related quality of life scores were significantly lower in the cervicogenic headache group. Problematic smartphone use was positively associated with depressive symptoms (r = 0.224) and poor sleep quality (r = 0.369), and negatively associated with mental health-related quality of life (r = −0.277). Neck-related disability (β = 0.327) and mental health-related quality of life (β = 0.551) were independent predictors of problematic smartphone use, explaining 31% of the variance.

Conclusions

Problematic smartphone use is associated with greater symptom burden, emotional distress, sleep problems, and reduced quality of life in individuals with cervicogenic headache. Smartphone-related behavioural patterns may represent a modifiable factor to be considered within comprehensive rehabilitation and lifestyle-based management strategies.

Keywords

Cervicogenic headache problematic smartphone use neck disability pain sleep quality quality of life

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Olesen

. International classification of headache disorders. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 396–397.

Sjaastad

Fredriksen

Pfaffenrath

. Cervicogenic headache: diagnostic criteria. Headache J Head Face Pain 1990; 30: 725–726.

Sjaastad

Saunte

Hovdahl

, et al. ‘Cervicogenic’ headache. An hypothesis. Cephalalgia 1983; 3: 249–256.

Society HCSotIH. The international classification of headache disorders. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: 1–160.

Antonaci

Inan

. Headache and neck. Cephalalgia 2021; 41: 438–442.

Nilsson

. The prevalence of cervicogenic headache in a random population sample of 20–59 year olds. Spine 1995; 20: 1884–1888.

Liang

Galea

Thomas

, et al. Cervical musculoskeletal impairments in migraine and tension type headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskeletal Sci Pract 2019; 42: 67–83.

Bogduk

. The neck and headaches. Neurol Clin 2014; 32: 471–487.

Shimohata

Hasegawa

Onodera

, et al. The clinical features, risk factors, and surgical treatment of cervicogenic headache in patients with cervical spine disorders requiring surgery. Headache J Head Face Pain 2017; 57: 1109–1117.

10.

Demirci

Akgonul

. Headache in smartphone users: a cross-sectional study. J Neurol Psychol 2016; 4: 5.

11.

Fischer-Grote

Kothgassner

Felnhofer

. The impact of problematic smartphone use on children's and adolescents’ quality of life: a systematic review. Acta Paediatr 2021; 110: 1417–1424.

12.

Huang

, et al. Smartphone use and sleep quality in Chinese college students: a preliminary study. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11: 52.

13.

Lee

H-j

. Neck pain and functioning in daily activities associated with smartphone usage. J Korean Phys Therapy 2016; 28: 183–188.

14.

Y-j

Woo

Y-k

. Effects of smartphone use on muscle fatigue and pain and, cervical range of motion among subjects with and without neck muscle pain. Phys Therapy Korea 2014; 21: 28–37.

15.

Aabroo

Shafique

Javed

, et al. Frequency of cervicogenic headache in students due to usage of smart devices–cross sectional survey. Pak J Rehabil 2022; 11: 39–44.

16.

Kanniappan

Abraham

Veeragoudhaman

. Prevalence of cervicogenic headache among young population. Int J Res Granthaalayah 2022; 10: 14–26.

17.

Allam

Yousef

Tahoon

. Cervical posture among smart phone addictive with cervicogenic headache: matched case control study. Benha Int J Phys Therapy 2025; 3: 84–91. doi:10.21608/bijpt.2025.368573.1069

18.

Dikmen

Bozdağ

Güneş

, et al. Migren hastalarında baş ağrısı etki testinin (HIT-6) Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. Noro-Psikyatri Arsivi 2021; 58: 300–307.

19.

Telci

Karaduman

Yakut

, et al. The cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine 2009; 34: 1732–1735.

20.

Aydemir

. Hastane anksiyete ve depresyon olcegi Turkce formunun gecerlilik ve guvenilirligi. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 1997; 8: 187–280.

21.

Noyan

Enez Darcin

Nurmedov

, et al. Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığı Ölçeğinin Kısa Formunun üniversite öğrencilerindeTürkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Anatolian J Psychiatry/Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi 2015; 16: 73–81.

22.

Duruöz

Erdem

Gencer

, et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Jenkins Sleep Scale in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2018; 38: 261–265.

23.

Soylu

Kütük

. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of SF-12 health survey. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2022; 33: 108.

24.

Pradela

Bevilaqua-Grossi

Chaves

, et al. Measurement properties of the headache impact test (HIT-6™ Brazil) in primary and secondary headaches. Headache J Head Face Pain 2021; 61: 527–535.

25.

Pardos-Aguilella

Ceballos-Laita

Cabanillas-Barea

, et al. Is device guided training targeted to the craniocervical flexor and extensor muscles efficacious? A preliminary randomized controlled trial in a cervicogenic headache population. Musculoskeletal Sci Pract 2024; 69: 102900.

26.

Singh

Kataria

. Motor control assessment of the deep neck extensors (semispinalis cervicis) in cervicogenic headache: a comparative analysis of endurance, EMG activity, and muscle structure. J Orthop Rep 2025; 100703. doi:10.1016/j.jorep.2025.100703

27.

Nambi

Alghadier

Eltayeb

, et al. Comparative effectiveness of cervical vs thoracic spinal-thrust manipulation for care of cervicogenic headache: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2024; 19: e0300737.

28.

Westgaard

Winkel

. Guidelines for occupational musculoskeletal load as a basis for intervention: a critical review. Appl Ergon 1996; 27: 79–88.

29.

Westgaard

. Effects of physical and mental stressors on muscle pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999; 25: 19–24.

30.

Togha

Karimitafti

Ghorbani

, et al. Characteristics and comorbidities of headache in patients over 50 years of age: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22: 13.

31.

Karpuz

Yilmaz

Akdere

, et al. Frequency of cognitive dysfunction in individuals with cervicogenic headache. Neurol Asia 2023; 28: 329. doi:10.54029/2023rzc.

32.

Jellad

Kalai

Chaabeni

, et al. Effect of cervical traction on cervicogenic headache in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25: 842.

33.

Micarelli

Viziano

Granito

, et al. Temporomandibular disorders and cervicogenic dizziness: relations between cervical range of motion and clinical parameters. CRANIO® 2022; 40: 348–357.

34.

Aldabbas

Alshana

. Cervical cobb angle, sleep quality and psychological factors in patients with chronic neck pain with and without cervicogenic headache. Eur J Physiother 2025; 28: 19–25.

35.

Mingels

Dankaerts

van Etten

, et al. Exploring multidimensional characteristics in cervicogenic headache: relations between pain processing, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors. Brain Behav 2021; 11: e2339.

36.

Altmis Kacar

Ozkul

Baran

, et al. Effects of cervical stabilization training in patients with headache: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain 2024; 28: 633–648.

37.

Alsalameh

Harisi

Alduayji

, et al. Evaluating the relationship between smartphone addiction/overuse and musculoskeletal pain among medical students at Qassim University. J Family Med Prim Care 2019; 8: 2953–2959.

38.

Guloglu

Yalcin

. The effect of smartphone addiction on neck pain and disability in university students. Kafkas J Med Sci/Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi 2021; 11: 225–230. doi:10.5505/kjms.2021.7505.

39.

Mustafaoglu

Yasaci

Zirek

, et al. The relationship between smartphone addiction and musculoskeletal pain prevalence among young population: a cross-sectional study. Korean J Pain 2021; 34: 72–81.

40.

Yaşarer

Mete

Kaygusuz Benli

, et al. Association between smartphone addiction and myofascial trigger points. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25: 54.

41.

Czepinska

Zawadka

Gawda

. Neck pain, disability and mobile phone usage among physiotherapy students-a cross-sectional study. Ann Agric Environ Med 2024; 31: 125–130. doi:10.26444/aaem/174679.

42.

Ishii

Manabe

Ito

, et al. Relationship between smartphone addiction and headaches in people with chronic headache. BPB Rep 2024; 7: 33–38.