Abstract
Objectives
This scoping review maps evidence on sex and gender differences in technology-assisted stroke rehabilitation and identifies gaps to inform equitable approaches.
Data sources
Searches were conducted in two rounds (up to March 2025 and April 2025–March 2026) on MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.
Review methods
Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we included primary studies reporting sex and gender outcomes in adults with stroke receiving technological interventions, guided by the PCC framework.
Results
From 7071 records, 11 studies (1626 stroke survivors, 39.9% female) met inclusion criteria. Interventions included robotic exoskeletons, soft robotic gloves, virtual reality, exergaming, functional electrical stimulation, and biofeedback. Five studies found no significant sex differences. However, others reported female advantages in robotic gait training (p = 0.007), functional electrical stimulation (OR = 3.92), soft robotic glove hand function (3.43-fold greater improvement), and Virtual Reality-based balance recovery (p = 0.03). Younger women (<62 years) outperformed men in fine motor tasks, a pattern reversing with age.
Conclusion
Gender and sex disparities in rehabilitation outcomes vary by technology type, underscoring the need for inclusive device designs and improved female representation in trials. Future research must integrate biological and sociocultural perspectives and standardize outcome measures to optimize tailored rehabilitation for all stroke survivors.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
