Socioeconomic differences in service use,payment and receipt of illness-related benefits in the last year of life: findings from the British Household Panel Survey
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2008
Socioeconomic differences in service use,payment and receipt of illness-related benefits in the last year of life: findings from the British Household Panel Survey
Background: Terminal illness presents a financial challenge to many households, but in Britain the situation should be eased by state benefits, such as attendance allowance, which is available to everyone in the last six months of life without means testing. Aim: To investigate the use of health and social services, payments and benefit receipt by individuals in differing financial circumstances in the year before death. Methods: Analysis of individual level panel data for 1652 community-dwelling decedents from 12 waves of the British Household Panel Study (1991–2003). Results: In the year before death, over 90% of decedents saw their GP, and around one-third spent some time in hospital. More than 80% paid no fees for any services. Over a third of decedents aged over 65 reported financial strain, but only 13.9% of these were receiving attendance allowance. People who felt that they were having financial difficulties were more likely to be frequent attenders in primary care, taking age, health status and other factors into account (adjusted OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.3–2.6, P < 0.001). Older age was associated with less use of primary, but not secondary care. Conclusions: Financial strain was common, but benefit uptake low. Primary health care professionals saw nearly all decedents in their last year, and could play an important role in ensuring that the elderly and the less well off are aware of the services and benefits available to them.
1 Pickard L . The Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Support and Services to Informal Carers of Older People. A Literature Review Prepared for the Audit Commission.London : The Audit Commission , 2004.
2.
2 Addington-Hall JMMacDonald LDAnderson HR . Randomised controlled trial of effects of coordinating care for terminally ill cancer patients.BMJ1992; 305: 1317 – 1322 .
3.
3 Chochinov HMKristjanson L . Dying to pay: the cost of end-of-life care.J Palliat Care1998; 14: 5 – 15 .
4.
5.
6.
6 McWhinney IRBass MJOrr V . Factors associated with location of death (home or hospital) of patients referred to a palliative care team.CMAJ Can Med Assoc J1995; 152: 361 – 367 .
7.
7 Tunnage B; Tudor Edwards R; Linck P; . Estimation of the Extent of Unclaimed Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance for People with a Terminal Diagnosis of Cancer. Bangor: Centre for the Economics of Health, University of Wales, March 2004.
8.
8 Cartwright A . Social class differences in health and care in the year before death.J Epidemiol Community Health1992; 46: 54 – 57 .
9.
9 Addington-Hall JMcCarthy M . Dying from cancer: results of a national population-based investigation.Palliat Med1995; 9: 295 – 305 .
10.
10 Gore JMBrophy CJGreenstone MA . How well do we care for patients with end stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? A comparison of palliative care and quality of life in COPD and lung cancer.Thorax2000; 55: 1000 – 1006 .
11.
11 Levenson JWMcCarthy EPLynn JDavis RBPhillips RS . The last six months of life for patients with congestive heart failure.J Am Geriat Soc2000; 48(5 Suppl): S101 – S109 .
12.
12 Waldrop DPKramer BJSkretny JAMilch RAFinn W . Final transitions: family caregiving at the end of life.J Palliat Med2005; 8: 623 – 638 .
13.
14.
14 Neal RDHeywood PLMorley S . Frequent attenders’ consulting patterns with general practitioners.Br J Gen Pract2000; 50: 972 – 976 .
15.
15 Carney TAGuy SJeffrey G . Frequent attenders in general practice: a retrospective 20-year follow-up study.Br J Gen Pract2001; 51: 567 – 569 .
16.
16 SPSS for Windows . Rel. 13.0.Chicago, IL : SPSS Inc. , 2004.
17.
17 Koffman JSHigginson IJ . Fit to care? A comparison of informal caregivers of first-generation Black Caribbeans and White dependants with advanced progressive disease in the UK.Health Soc Care Community2003; 11: 528 – 536 .
18.
19.
19 Personal communication . Department for Work and Pensions, presented in Hanratty B, Mair F. Palliative care for heart failure.Br J Cardiac Nurs2006; 1: 64 – 67 .
20.
20 Adams JWhite MMoffatt SHowel DMackintosh J . A systematic review of the health, social and financial impacts of welfare rights advice delivered in healthcare settings.BMC Public Health2006; 6: 81 .
21.
21 Toeg DMercer LIliffe SLenihan P . Proactive, targeted benefits advice for older people in general practice: a feasibility study.Health Soc Care Community2003; 11: 124 – 128 .
22.
22 Greasley PSmall N . Providing welfare advice in general practice: referrals, issues and outcomes.Health Soc Care Community2005; 13: 249 – 258 .
23.
23 Abbott SHobby LCotter S . What is the impact on individual health of services in general practice settings which offer welfare benefits advice?Health Soc Care Community2006; 14: 1 – 8 .
24.
24 Goddard MSmith P . Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK.Soc Sci Med2001; 53: 1149 – 1162 .
25.
25 van Doorslaer EMasseria C . Koolman, Xander. OECD Health Equity Research Group. Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries.CMAJ Can Med Assoc J2006; 174: 177 – 183 .
26.
26 Katz JS . Palliative care in residential care facilities: a brief review.Int J Palliat Nurs2005; 11: 130 – 131 .
27.
27 Chandola T . Social class differences in mortality using the new UK National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification.Soc Sci Med2000; 50: 641 – 649 .
28.
28 Rose DPevalin DJ . Social class differences in mortality using the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification–too little, too soon: a reply to Chandola.Soc Sci Med2000; 51: 1121 – 1127 .
29.
29 Bowling A . Financial circumstances and having enough money. In Ageing Well Quality of Life in Old Age.Maidenhead : Open University Press , 2005: 186.
