Continued study of the psychometric properties of the McGill quality of life questionnaire

Abstract

The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL) is a widely used tool that has been specifically developed to measure the quality of life of patients facing a life-threatening illness. Preferably, a self-report instrument has an equal number of items worded positively and negatively. However, all the psychological scales of the MQOL are worded so that a high score is negative, whereas the existential scales are worded so that a high score is positive. The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of MQOL item formatting on patient responses. In order to do so, a modified version of the questionnaire was distributed to and completed by 205 patients in two oncology clinics. The modified version had an equal amount of items worded in a positive direction and negative direction in each of the domains. Results of this study were found to be different from those of other studies: the loading of the items was partly based on scale direction. These changes support the idea that the MQOL formatting has some impact on patient responses. However, factors were also determined by content. Given that MQOL has been widely used and the original formatting provides conceptually clearer subscales, we suggest maintaining the original format, keeping in mind the effect of formatting when interpreting scores.

Keywords

cancer McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire measurement quality of life

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Cohen SR . Quality of life assessment in palliative care. In: E Bruera IJ Higginson C Ripamonti CF Gunten , (eds), Textbook of palliative care medicine. London, England: Hodder Arnold; 2006; p. 349–355.

2 Cohen SR Boston P Mount BM Porterfield P . Changes in quality of life following admission to palliative care units. Palliat Med 2001; 15: 363–371.

3 Cohen SR . Assessing quality of life in palliative care. In: R Portenoy E Bruera , (eds), Issues in palliative care research. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003; p. 231–241.

4 Cohen SR . Defining and measuring quality of life in palliative care. In: E Bruera R Portnoy , (eds), Topics in palliative care. London, England: Oxford University Press; 2001; p. 137–156.

5 Streiner DL Norman GR . Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. London, England: Oxford University Press; 2003.

6 Cohen SR Mount BM Bruera E Provost M Rowe J Tong K . Validity of the McGill quality of life questionnaire in the palliative care setting: a multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain. Palliat Med 1997; 11: 3–20.

7 Cohen SR Mount BM . Living with cancer: ‘good’ days and ‘bad’ days—what produces them? (can the McGill quality of life questionnaire distinguish between them?). Cancer 2000; 89: 1854–1865.

8 Cohen SR Hassan SA Lapointe BJ Mount BM . Quality of life in HIV disease as measured by the McGill quality of life questionnaire. AIDS 1996; 10: 1421–1427.

9 Cohen SR Mount BM Tomas JJN Mount LF . Existential well-being is an important determinant of quality of life: evidence from the McGill quality of life questionnaire. Cancer 1996; 77: 576–586.

10.

10 Bentur N Resnizky S . Validation of the McGill quality of life questionnaire in home hospice settings in Israel. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 538–544.

11.

11 Hu WY Dai YT Berry D Chiu TY . Psychometric testing of the translated McGill quality of life questionnaire-Taiwan version in patients with terminal cancer. J Formos Med Assoc 2003; 102: 97–104.

12.

12 Lo SLR Woo J Zhoc KCH Li YPC Yeo W Johnson P . Cross-cultural validations of the McGill quality of life questionnaire in Hong Kong Chinese. Palliat Med 2001; 15: 387–397.

13.

13 Tabachnick BG Fidell LS . Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. California State University, Northridge: Harper Collins; 2000.

14.

14 Norman GR Sloan JA Wyrwich KW . Interpretation of changes in health related quality of life: the remarquable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41: 582–592.