A comparison of the quality of care provided to cancer patients in the UK in the last three months of life in in-patient hospices compared with hospitals,from the perspective of bereaved relatives: results from a survey using the VOICES questionnaire

Abstract

The importance of evaluating systematically the effectiveness of hospice care has been noted for at least 20 years. There is, however, limited evidence about whether and how the care provided to terminally ill patients by in-patient hospices in the UK differs from that provided in NHS hospitals. In this article, we, therefore, present a comparison of hospice in-patient care and hospital care for cancer patients in the UK, from the perspective of bereaved relatives who had experienced both types of care during the last 3 months of the patient’s life. The Office of National Statistics drew a random sample of 800 deaths in South London in 2002, and sent the person who registered the death (the informant) a Views of Informal Carers – Evaluation of Services (VOICES) questionnaire 3–9 months after the death, with up to two reminders. There was a response rate of 48%. For this analysis, 40 cancer patients whose informant reported both a hospice in-patient admission and a hospital admission in the last 3 months of life were identified. Informants answered the same questions about each admission and responses on these were compared. There were statistically significant differences between respondents’ views of hospice and hospital care on eight out of 13 variables measuring aspects of satisfaction with care, with a trend towards statistical significance on a further two: in all cases respondents rated hospice care more positively than hospital care. There were no differences in the experience of pain and breathlessness in the two settings, but respondents rated pain control by the hospice as more effective. In comparison to hospital care, from the perspective of bereaved relatives, hospice in-patient care provided better pain control, better communication with patients and families, and better medical, nursing and personal care, which treated the patient with more dignity. Further research is needed to confirm these findings using a wider sample of in-patient hospices in the UK and including the perspectives of patients. Providing high quality care for terminally ill patients in acute hospitals remains an important challenge.

Keywords

evaluation hospice outcomes palliative care quality satisfaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

2 Help the Hospices . UK independent voluntary hospices: analysis of hospice accounts 2004. London: Help the Hospices; 2005.

3 Seale C . What happens in hospices- a review of research evidence. Soc Sci Med 1991; 28: 551–559.

4 Goddard M . The role of economics in the evaluation of hospice care. Health Policy 1989; 13: 19–34.

5 Aiken L . Evaluation research and public policy: lessons from the National Hospice Survey. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 1–4.

6 Kane R Wales J Bernstein L Leibowitz A Kaplan S . A randomised controlled trial of hospice care. Lancet 1984; 8382: 890–894.

7 Greer D Mor V Morris J Sherwood S Kidder D Birnbaum H . An alternative in terminal care: results of the National Hospice Study. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 9–26.

8 Mor V Masterton-Allen S . Hospice care systems: structures, processes, costs and outcome. USA: Springer; 1987.

9 Higginson I Finlay I Goodwin D Hood K Edwards AG Cook A . Is there evidence that palliative care teams alter the end of life experience of patients and their caregivers? J Pain Symptom Manage 2003; 25: 150–168.

10.

10 Goodwin D Higginson I Myers K Douglas HR Normand CE . Effectiveness of palliative day care in improving pain, symptom control, and quality of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003; 25: 202–212.

11.

11 Davies E Higginson I . Systematic review of specialist palliative day care for adults with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2005; 13: 607–627.

12.

12 Grande G Todd C Barclay S Farquhar M . Does hospital at home for palliative care facilitate death at home? Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1999; 319: 1472–1475.

13.

13 Seale C . A comparison of hospice and conventional care. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 147–152.

14.

14 Seale C Kelly M . A comparison of hospice and hospital care for people who die; views of the surviving spouse. Palliat Med 1997; 11: 93–100.

15.

15 Seamark D Williams S Hall M Lawrence C Gilbert J . Dying from cancer in community hospitals or in home: closest lay carer’s perceptions. Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 1317–1321.

16.

16 Hinton J . Comparison of places and policies for terminal care. Lancet 1979; 1: 29–32.

17.

17 Parkes C Parkes J . Hospice versus hospital care- re-evaluation after 10 years as seen by surviving spouses. Postgrad Med J 1984; 60: 120–124.

18.

18 Addington-Hall J Aspinal F Hughes R Dunckley M Higginson I . Project to improve management of terminal illness- summary of findings from PROMOTE. London: National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care; 2004.

19.

19 Addington-Hall J Walker L Jones C Karlsen S McCarthy M . A randomised controlled trial of postal versus interviewer administration of a questionnaire measuring satisfaction with and use of services received in the year before death. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 802–807.

20.

20 Aspinal F Addington-Hall J Hughes R Higginson I . Using satisfaction to measure the quality of palliative care: a review of literature. J Adv Nurs 2003; 42: 324–334.

21.

22.

22 Aspinal F Hughes R Dunckley M Addington-Hall J . What is important to measure in the last months and weeks of life? A modified nominal group study. Int J Nurs Stud 2006; 43: 393–403.

23.

24.

25.

25 Addington-Hall J Karlsen S . A national survey of health professionals and volunteers working in voluntary hospices in the UK. II. Staff and volunteers' experiences of working in hospices. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 49–57.

26.

26 Rogers A Karlsen S Addington-Hall J . All the services were excellent. It was when the human element comes in that things go wrong: dissatisfaction with hospice care in the last years of life. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31: 768–774.

27.

27 Seymour J . Critical moments -death and dying in intensive care. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2001.

28.

28 Costello J . Nursing older dying patients: findings from a ethnographic study of death and dying in elderly care wards. J Adv Nurs 2001; 35: 59–68.

29.

29 Mills M Davies H Arnold E . Care of dying patients in hospital. BMJ 1994; 309: 583–586.

30.

30 Timmermans S . The paradox of nursing terminal patients in a Belgian general hospital. Omega 1993; 27: 281–293.

31.

31 Pincombe J Brown M McCutcheon H . No time for dying: a study of the care of dying patients in two acute care Australian hospitals. J Palliat Care 2003; 19: 77–86.

32.

32 McDonnell M Johnston G Gallagher A McGlade K . Palliative care in district general hospitals: the nurse's perspective. Int J Palliat Nurs 2002; 8: 169–175.

33.

33 Hopkinson J Hallett C Luker K . Caring for dying people in hospital. J Adv Nurs 2003; 44: 525–533.

34.

34 McPherson C Addington-Hall J . Judging the quality of care at the end of life: can proxies provide reliable information? Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 95–109.

35.

35 McPherson C Addington-Hall J . Evaluating palliative care: bereaved family members’ evaluations of patients’ pain, anxiety and depression. J Pain Symptom Manage 2004; 28: 104–114.

36.

36 Ellershaw J Wilkinson S . Care of the Dying: a pathway to excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.

37.

37 Cohen J Bilsen J Addington-Hall J Löfmark R Miccinesi G Kaasa S . Organisation of dying: population-based study of dying in hospital in six European countries. Palliat Med 2008; 22: 118–125.

38.

38 Catt S Blanchard M Addington-Hall J Zis M Blizard R King M . Older adults' attitudes to death, palliative treatment and hospice care. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 402–410.

39.

39 Thomas C Morris S Clark D . Place of death: preferences among cancer patients and their carers. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 2431–2444.