Key stakeholders' experiences and views of the NHS End of Life Care Programme: findings from a national evaluation

Abstract

This article reports on the qualitative interview component of a national evaluation of the NHS End of Life Care Programme. It describes and discusses the views and experiences of 37 stakeholders of the Programme in relation to its development and implementation, impact and sustainability. The sample comprises individuals holding different roles in, and contrasting views and experiences of the Programme, and from various locations in England. Overall, the aims, approach and impact of the Programme were described positively, although concerns about achieving sustainability were widespread. The extent of support for the Programme's primary aim to extend and improve end of life care, and the contribution of the hardworking and skilled individuals involved with its implementation, were highlighted as key influences on its successes. The authors conclude that many of the views and experiences highlighted in the stakeholder enquiry are reflected in the development and detail of the recently announced End of Life Care Strategy.

Keywords

end of life care evaluation inequalities interviews palliative care policy qualitative

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 E Davies IJ Higginson , (eds). The solid facts: (Palliative care). Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2004.

2 Eve A Smith AM Tebbit P . Hospice and palliative care in the UK 1994/5, including a summary of trends 1990–5. Palliat Med 1997; 11: 31–43.

3 Firth S . Wider horizons. Care of the dying in a multicultural society. London: National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care Services; 2001.

4 AddingtonHall . JM, Altmann, D, McCarthy, M. Variations in age in symptoms and dependency levels experienced by people in the last year of life, as reported by surviving family, friends and officials. Age Ageing 1998; 27: 129–136.

5 Seymour J Clark D . Palliative care and policy in England: a review of health improvement plans for 1999–2003. Palliat Med 2002; 16: 5–11.

6 Department of Health. The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. Command paper, July 1, 2000.

7 Clark D Seymour J . Reflections on palliative care. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999.

8 Seymour J; Kennedy S; Almack K; Moghadden M; Arthur T; . The NHS End of Life Care Programme: an evaluation of processes, outcomes and impact. University of Nottingham, School of Nursing.

10.

11.

11 National Institute for Clinical Excellence . Guidance on cancer services. Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. London: NICE; 2004.

12.

13.

13 Department of Health. Building on the best: choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS, December 9, 2003, No: 34209 Copyright holder: Crown.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

18 Donabedian A . The quality of care. How can it be measured. JAMA 1988; 260: 1743–1748.

19.

19 Aoun SM Kristjanson LJ . Challenging the framework for evidence in palliative care research. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 461–465.

20.

20 Ritchie J Spencer L . Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: A Bryman R Burgess , (eds), Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–194.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

27 Kennedy S; Seymour J; . Facilitating success – the contribution of facilitators to the effectiveness of programmes. A commissioned review of the literature. University of Nottingham, July 2008.

28.

28 National Audit Office. End of Life Care. Appendix Five International Comparisons. Report by the comptroller and auditor general | HC 1043 Session 2007–2008 | 26 November 2008.

29.

29 Clark D Seymour J . Reflections on palliative care: sociological and policy perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1998.