The aim of this study is to synthesize knowledge about the process of shared decision-making (SDM) in palliative care. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Web of Science were searched with core concepts: shared decisions, patient participation in decision-making, and palliative care. Titles and abstracts were screened according to inclusion criteria (original research, adult patients, Western contexts, decision-making, palliative treatment or setting), yielding 37 articles for analysis. A narrative synthesis was created using the methods of thematic analysis, conceptual mapping, and critical reflection on the synthesis process. Results demonstrate that while a majority of patients want to participate in treatment decisions to some extent, most do not achieve their preferred levels of involvement because decisions are delayed and alternative treatment options are seldom discussed. The literature regarding the process of SDM itself remains scarce in palliative care. Further research is needed in order to better understand the longitudinal, interactive, and interdisciplinary process of decision-making in palliative care.
MurtaghMJ. Decision-making, power, and the doctor-patient relationship. In: EdwardsAElwynG (eds) Shared Decision-Making in Health Care: Achieving Evidence-Based Patient Choice, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, 79–84.
2.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
3.
ElwynG. Arriving at the postmodern medical consultation. Prim Care2005; 5: 287–291.
4.
CordellaM. The Dynamic Consultation: A Discourse Analytical Study of Doctor–Patient Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2004.
5.
CharlesCGafniAWhelanT. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med1997; 44: 681–692.
6.
ChangVTSambamoorthiN. Decision-making in palliative care. In: WerthJLBlevinsD (eds) Decision Making near the End of Life: Issues, Development, and Future Directions. London, New York: Brunner-Routledge, 2008, 143–168.
7.
GauthierDMSwigartVA. The contextual nature of decision making near the end of life: hospice patients’ perspectives. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2003; 20: 121–128.
8.
HancockKClaytonJMParkerSWalderSButowPNCarrickS. Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: A systematic review. Palliat Med2007; 21: 507–517.
9.
HancockKClaytonJMParkerSWalderSButowPNCarrickS. Discrepant perceptions about end-of-life communication: A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage2007; 34: 190–200.
10.
ParkerSMClaytonJMHancockKWalderSButowPNCarrickS. A systematic review of prognosis/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: Patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style, and timing of information. J Pain Symptom Manage2007; 34: 81–93.
11.
GastonCMMitchellG. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med2005; 61: 2252–2264.
12.
PluyePGagnonM-PGriffithsFJohnson-LafleurJ. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. Int J Nurs Stud2009; 46: 529–546.
CookAMFinlayIGEdwardsAGKHoodKHigginsonIJGoodwinDM. Efficiency of searching the grey literature in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage2001; 22: 797–801.
15.
LégaréFRattéSStaceyDKryworuchkoJGravelKGrahamID. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2010; 5: CD006732–CD006732.
16.
SladekRTiemanJCurrowDC. Improving search filter development: A study of palliative care literature. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2007; 7: 18–18.
17.
LastM. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
18.
GreenJThorogoodN. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2004.
19.
PopeCMaysNPopayJ. Synthesizing Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2007.
20.
MoherDCookDJEastwoodSOlkinIRennieDStroupDF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Lancet1999; 354: 1896–1900.
21.
DegnerLFSloanJA. Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?J Clin Epidemiol1992; 45: 941–950.
22.
RothenbacherDLutzMPPorzsoltF. Treatment decisions in palliative cancer care: patients’ preferences for involvement and doctors’ knowledge about it. Eur J Cancer1997; 33: 1184–1189.
23.
BrueraESweeneyCCalderKPalmerLBenisch-TolleyS. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol2001; 19: 2883–2885.
24.
GattellariMVoigtKJButowPNTattersallMHN. When the treatment goal is not cure: Are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions?J Clin Oncol2002; 20: 503–513.
25.
ClaytonJButowPTattersallMChyeRNoelMDavisJM. Asking questions can help: Development and preliminary evaluation of a question prompt list for palliative care patients. Br J Cancer2003; 89: 2069–2077.
26.
SzumacherELlewellyn-ThomasHFranssenEChowEDeBoerGDanjouxC. Treatment of bone metastases with palliative radiotherapy: Patients’ treatment preferences. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2005; 61: 1473–1481.
27.
KoedootCGDe HaanRJStiggelboutAMStalmeierPFMDe GraeffABakkerPJM. Palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care? A prospective study explaining patients’ treatment preference and choice. Br J Cancer2003; 89: 2219–2226.
28.
KoedootCGOortFJde HaanRJBakkerPJMde GraeffAde HaesJCJM. The content and amount of information given by medical oncologists when telling patients with advanced cancer what their treatment options are: Palliative chemotherapy and watchful- waiting. Eur J Cancer2004; 40: 225–235.
29.
GoncalvesFMarquesARochaSLeitaoPMesquitaTMoutinhoS. Breaking bad news: Experiences and preferences of advanced cancer patients at a Portuguese oncology centre. Palliat Med2005; 19: 526–531.
30.
LiuGFranssenEFitchMIWarnerE. Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol1997; 15: 110–115.
31.
WhitePHKuhlenschmidtHLVancuraBGNavariRM. Antimicrobial use in patients with advanced cancer receiving hospice care. J Pain Symptom Manage2003; 25: 438–443.
32.
EliottJAKealeyCPOlverIN. (Using) complementary and alternative medicine: The perceptions of palliative patients with cancer. J Palliat Med2008; 11: 58–67.
33.
BarryBHendersonA. Nature of decision-making in the terminally ill patient. Cancer Nurs1996; 19: 384–391.
34.
MurrayMAO’ConnorAMFisetVViolaR. Women’s decision making needs regarding place of care at the end of life. J Palliat Care2003; 19: 176–184.
35.
VolkerDLKahnDPenticuffJH. Patient control and end-of-life care part II: the patient perspective. Oncol Nurs Forum2004; 31: 954–960.
36.
PautexSHerrmannFRZulianGB. Role of advance directives in palliative care units: a prospective study. Palliat Med2008; 22: 835–841.
37.
GrunfeldEAMaherEJBrowneSWardPYoungTVivatB. Advanced breast cancer patients’ perceptions of decision making for palliative chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol2006; 24: 1090–1098.
38.
VerhaakCMKraaimaatFWStapsACJVan DaalWAJ. Informed consent in palliative radiotherapy: participation of patients and proxies in treatment decisions. Patient Educ Couns2000; 41: 63–71.
39.
TimmermansLMvan der MaazenRWVerhaakCMvan RoosmalenMSvan DaalWAJKraaimaatFW. Patient participation in discussing palliative radiotherapy. Patient Educ Couns2005; 57: 53–61.
40.
TimmermansLMvan der MaazenRWMLeerJWHKraaimaatFW. Palliative or curative treatment intent affects communication in radiation therapy consultations. Psychooncology2006; 15: 713–725.
41.
BottorffJLSteeleRDaviesBGarossinoCPorterfieldPShawM. Striving for balance: palliative care patients’ experiences of making everyday choices. J Palliat Care1998; 14: 7–17.
42.
CasarettDJCrowleyRLHirschmanKB. How should clinicians describe hospice to patients and families?J Am Geriatr Soc2004; 52: 1923–1928.
43.
CasarettDCrowleyRStevensonCXieSTenoJ. Making difficult decisions about hospice enrollment: what do patients and families want to know?J Am Geriatr Soc2005; 53: 249–254.
44.
ChenHHaleyWERobinsonBESchonwetterRS. Decisions for hospice care in patients with advanced cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc2003; 51: 789–797.
45.
CraftPSBurnsCMSmithWTBroomDH. Knowledge of treatment intent among patients with advanced cancer: a longitudinal study. Eur J Cancer Care2005; 14: 417–425.
46.
DeschepperRBernheimJLSticheleRVVan den BlockLMichielsEVan Der KelenG. Truth-telling at the end of life: A pilot study on the perspective of patients and professional caregivers. Patient Educ Couns2008; 71: 52–56.
47.
SzeJMarisetteSWilliamsDNyhof-YoungJCrooksDHusainA. Decision making in palliative radiation therapy: Reframing hope in caregivers and patients with brain metastases. Support Care Cancer2006; 14: 1055–1063.
48.
FerrellBRChuDZJWagmanLJuarezGBornemanTCullinaneC. Patient and surgeon decision making regarding surgery for advanced cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum2003; 30: E106–114.
49.
AudreySAbelJBlazebyJMFalkSCampbellR. What oncologists tell patients about survival benefits of palliative chemotherapy and implications for informed consent: Qualitative study. Br Med J2008; 337: 492–496.
50.
DroughtTSKoenigBA. ‘Choice’ in end-of-life decision making: researching fact or fiction?Gerontologist2002; 42(Spec no 3): 114–128.
51.
BottorffJLSteeleRDaviesBPorterfieldPGarossinoCShawM. Facilitating day-to-day decision making in palliative care. Cancer Nurs2000; 23: 141–150.
52.
NortonSABowersBJ. Working toward consensus: providers’ strategies to shift patients from curative to palliative treatment choices. Res Nurs Health2001; 24: 258–269.
53.
VolkerDLKahnDPenticuffJH. Patient control and end-of-life care part I: the advanced practice nurse perspective. Oncol Nurs Forum2004; 31: 945–953.
54.
FinchamLCoppGCaldwellKJonesLTookmanA. Supportive care: experiences of cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs2005; 9: 258–268.
55.
Sahlberg-BlomETernestedtBJohanssonJ. Patient participation in decision making at the end of life as seen by a close relative. Nurs Ethics2000; 7: 296–313.
56.
OlverIElliotJA. The perceptions of do-not-resuscitate policies of dying cancer patients. Psychooncology2008; 17: 347–353.
57.
CloverABrowneJMcErlainPVandenbergB. Patient approaches to clinical conversations in the palliative care setting. J Adv Nurs2004; 48: 333–341.
58.
CurrowDCWheelerJLGlarePAKaasaSAbernethyAP. A framework for generalizability in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage2009; 37: 373–386.
