A question prompt list for patients with advanced cancer in the final year of life: Development and cross-cultural evaluation

Abstract

Background:

Clinicians and patients find prognosis and end-of-life care discussions challenging. Misunderstanding one’s prognosis can contribute to poor decision-making and end-of-life quality of life. A question prompt list (booklet of questions patients can ask clinicians) targeting these issues may help overcome communication barriers. None exists for end-of-life discussions outside the palliative care setting.

Aim:

To develop/pilot a question prompt list facilitating discussion/planning of end-of-life care for oncology patients with advanced cancer from Australia and the United States and to explore acceptability, perceived benefits/challenges of using the question prompt list, suggestions for improvements and the necessity of country-specific adaptations.

Design:

An expert panel developed a question prompt list targeting prognosis and end-of-life issues. Australian/US semi-structured interviews and one focus group elicited feedback about the question prompt list. Transcribed data were analysed using qualitative methods.

Setting/participants:

Thirty-four patients with advanced cancer (15 Australian/19 US) and 13 health professionals treating such patients (7 Australian/6 US) from two Australian and one US cancer centre participated.

Results:

Most endorsed the entire question prompt list, though a minority queried the utility/appropriateness of some questions. Analysis identified four global themes: (1) reinforcement of known benefits of question prompt lists, (2) appraisal of content and suggestions for further developments, (3) perceived benefits and challenges in using the question prompt list and (4) contrasts in Australian/US feedback. These contrasts necessitated distinct Australian/US final versions of the question prompt list.

Conclusions:

Participants endorsed the question prompt list as acceptable and useful. Feedback resulted in two distinct versions of the question prompt list, accommodating differences between Australian and US approaches to end-of-life discussions, highlighting the appropriateness of tailoring communication aides to individual populations.

Keywords

Question prompt list advanced cancer terminal care cross-cultural comparison communication qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Cancer Council statistics. http://www.cancer.org.au/aboutcancer/FactsFigures.htm

The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to provide care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. JAMA 1995; 274: 1591–1598.

Gattellari

Butow

Tattersall

MHN

. Misunderstanding in cancer patients: why shoot the messenger? Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 39–46.

Gattellari

Voigt

Butow

. When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions? J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 503–513.

The

Hak

Koeter

. Collusion in doctor–patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. West J Med 2001; 174: 247–253.

Hagerty

Butow

Ellis

. Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1721–1730.

Weeks

Cook

O’Day

. Relationship between cancer patients’ predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA 1998; 279: 1709–1714.

Temel

Greer

Muzikansky

. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 733–742.

Kaplan

Greenfield

Gandek

. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124: 497–504.

10.

Trice

Prigerson

. Communication in end-stage cancer: review of the literature and future research. J Health Commun 2009; 14: 95–108.

11.

Brown

Butow

Boyer

. Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question asking. Br J Cancer 1999; 80: 242–248.

12.

Clayton

Butow

Tattersall

MHN

. Randomised controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 715–723.

13.

Bruera

Sweeney

Willey

. Breast cancer patient perception of the helpfulness of a prompt sheet versus a general information sheet during outpatient consultation: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003; 25: 412–419.

14.

Dimoska

Tattersall

MHN

Butow

. Can a ‘prompt list’ empower cancer patients to ask relevant questions? Cancer 2008; 113: 225–237.

15.

McJannett

Butow

Tattersall

MHN

. Asking questions can help: development of a question prompt list for cancer patients seeing a surgeon. Eur J Cancer Prev 2003; 12: 397–405.

16.

Clayton

Butow

Tattersall

MHN

. Asking questions can help: development and preliminary evaluation of a question prompt list for palliative care patients. Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 2069–2077.

17.

Caminiti

Diodati

Filiberti

. Cross-cultural adaptation and patients’ judgments of a question prompt list for Italian-speaking cancer patients. BMC Heath Serv Res 2010; 10: 16.

18.

Parker

Clayton

Hancock

. A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style and timing of information. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 34: 81–93.

19.

Blendon

Schoen

DesRoches

. Inequities in health care: a five-country survey. Health Aff 2002; 21: 182–191.

20.

The Economist Intelligence Unit. The quality of death: ranking end-of-life care across the world. The Economist, 30 July 2010.

21.

Steinhauser

Christakis

Clipp

. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family physicians and other care providers. JAMA 2000; 284: 2476–2482.

22.

Steinhauser

Clipp

McNeilly

. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132: 825–832.

23.

Hebert

Schulz

Copeland

. Pilot testing of a question prompt sheet to encourage family caregivers of cancer patients and physicians to discuss end-of-life issues. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2009; 26: 24–32.

24.

Glynne-Jones

Ostler

Lumley-Graybow

. Can I look at my list? An evaluation of a ‘prompt sheet’ within an oncology outpatient clinic. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2006; 18: 395–400.

25.

Miles

Huberman

. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1994.

26.

Bernard

Ryan

. Text analysis: qualitative and quantitative methods. In: Bernard

(ed.) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1998, pp. 595–646.

27.

Creswell

. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1988.

28.

Lewis

. ATLAS/ti and NUD-IST: a comparative review of two leading qualitative data analysis packages. Cult Anthropol Meth 1998; 10: 41–47.

29.

Morse

Barrett

Mayan

. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Meth 2002; 1: 1–19.

30.

Stevens

Ahmedzai

. Why do breast cancer patients decline entry into randomized trials and how do they feel about their decision later: a prospective, longitudinal, in-depth interview study. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 52: 341–348.

31.

Walczak

Butow

Davidson

. Patient perspectives regarding communication about prognosis and end-of-life issues: how can it be optimised? Patient Educ Couns 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.009.

32.

Parks

Winter

. End of life decision making for cancer patients. Prim Care 2009; 36: 811–823.

33.

Helft

. Necessary collusion: prognostic communication with advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 3146–3150.

34.

Mack

Wolfe

Cook

. Hope and prognostic disclosure. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 5636–5642.

35.

Christakis

Lamont

. Extent and determinants of error in physicians’ prognoses for terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 2000; 320: 469–473.

36.

Stiefel

Barth

Bensing

.; for the participants. Communication skills training in oncology: a position paper based on a consensus meeting among European experts in 2009. Ann Oncol 2010; 21: 204–207.

37.

Kiely

Soon

Tattersall

MHN

. How long have I got? Estimating typical, best-case, and worst-case scenarios for patients starting first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review of recent randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 456–463.

38.

Back

Arnold

Baile

. Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 453–460.

39.

Fallowfield

Jenkins

Farewell

. Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 650–656.

40.

Fallowfield

Jenkins

Farewell

. Enduring impact of communication skills training: results of a 12-month follow-up. Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 1445–1449.

41.

Cegela

. Patient communication skills training: a review with implications for cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 50: 91–94.

42.

Jeong

SY-S

Higgins

McMillan

. The essentials of advance care planning for end-of-life care for older people. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19: 389–397.

43.

Sabatino

. The evolution of health care advance planning law and policy. Milbank Q 2010; 88: 211–239.

44.

Detering

Hancock

Reade

. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2010. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c1345.

45.

Cherlin

Fried

Prigerson

. Communication between physicians and family caregivers about care at the end of life: when do discussions occur and what is said? J Palliat Med 2005; 8: 1176–1185.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB