Patients’,family caregivers’,and professionals’ perspectives on quality of palliative care: A qualitative study

Abstract

Background:

The quality of palliative care is the foremost preoccupation of clinicians, decision-makers, and managers as well as patients and families. Major input from healthcare professionals is required to develop indicators for the quality of palliative care, but the involvement of patients and families is also recognized as essential, even though this is rarely achieved in practice.

Aim:

The objectives of this study were to identify (1) convergences and divergences in the points of view of different stakeholders (patients, families, healthcare professionals) relative to key elements of the quality of palliative care and (2) avenues for refining existing indicators of quality of palliative care.

Design:

Cross-sectional qualitative study.

Setting/participants:

There were six settings: two hospital-based palliative care units, one hospice, and three other medical units where a mobile palliative care team intervene. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 61 patients, families, healthcare professionals, and managers.

Results:

Four major dimensions of quality of care are deemed critical by patients, their families, and professionals: comprehensive support for the patients themselves, clinical management, involvement of families, and care for the imminently dying person and death. Differences exist between various stakeholders regarding perceptions of some dimensions of quality of care. Avenues for improving current quality of care indicators are identified.

Conclusion:

Our study results can be used to refine or develop quality indicators that truly mirror the points of view of patients and their families and of healthcare professionals.

Keywords

Palliative care quality of healthcare quality indicators qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care. 2nd ed. Pittsburgh, PA: National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care, 2009, www.nationalconsensusproject.org

Eagar

Watters

Currow

. The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC)—measuring the quality and outcomes of palliative care on a routine basis. Aust Health Rev 2010; 34: 186–192.

Stefanou

Faircloth

. Exploring the concept of quality care for the person who is dying. Br J Community Nurs 2010; 15(12): 588–593.

Clark

Graham

. Evolution and change in palliative care around the world. Medicine 2011; 39(11): 636–638.

Nelson

Puntillo

Pronovost

. In their own words: patients and families define high-quality palliative care in the intensive unit. Crit Care Med 2010; 38(3): 808–818.

Lorenz

Lynn

. Evidence for improving palliative care at the end of life. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 147–159.

Bakitas

Ahles

Skalla

. Proxy perspectives regarding end-of-life care for persons with cancer. Cancer 2008; 112(8): 1854–1861.

Grunfeld

Urquhart

Mykhalovskiy

. Toward population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care: testing stakeholder agreement. Cancer 2008; 112(10): 2301–2308.

Hales

Zimmermann

Rodin

The quality of dying and death. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168(9): 912–918.

10.

Strauss

Corbin

. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1998.

11.

Strauss

Corbin

. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1990.

12.

Tong

Sainsbury

Craig

. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19(6): 349–357.

13.

Patton

. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2002.

14.

Dalal

Palla

Hui

. Association between a name change from palliative to supportive care and the timing of patient referrals at a comprehensive cancer center. Oncologist 2011; 16(1): 105–111.

15.

Guba

Lincoln

. Fourth generation evaluation. 1st ed. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1989.

16.

Miles

Huberman

. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1994.

17.

Crabtree

Miller

. Doing qualitative research (research methods for primary care). 3rd ed. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1992.

18.

Van Mechelen

Aertgeerts

De Ceulaer

. Defining the palliative care patient: a systematic review. Palliat Med 2013; 27(3): 197–208.

19.

Pasman

HRW

Brandt

Deliens

. Quality indicators for palliative care: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009; 38(1): 145–156.

20.

Yang

Ewing

Booth

. What is the role of specialist palliative care in an acute hospital setting? A qualitative study exploring views of patients and carers. Palliat Med 2012; 26(8): 1011–1017.

21.

Ewing

Grande

. Development of a Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: a qualitative study. Palliat Med 2013; 27(3): 244–256.