Implementation of tools for identifying palliative care needs and supporting advance care planning: A scoping review of barriers and facilitators in hospital settings
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2026
Implementation of tools for identifying palliative care needs and supporting advance care planning: A scoping review of barriers and facilitators in hospital settings
Implementing tools to identify and support palliative care needs remains challenging in hospitals, requiring a clear understanding of implementation determinants. This study defines tools as clinical resources for palliative care identification, needs assessment, and advance care planning support.
Aim:
This scoping review aimed to identify and categorise the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of tools in hospital settings.
Design:
Following the Arksey and O’Malley framework with PRISMA-ScR reporting, we employed a hybrid analysis combining inductive thematic coding with deductive mapping onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Studies in English, Danish, Norwegian, or Swedish were considered eligible for inclusion.
Data sources:
In May 2024, the databases MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SocINDEX, and PsycINFO were searched for studies focusing on tool implementation by healthcare professionals in hospital settings.
Results:
From 4032 records screened, 25 studies were included. Determinants were identified across all five Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains, though primarily concentrated within the Inner Setting and Individuals. Key barriers included time constraints, lack of training, and fragmented communication. Facilitators comprised strong leadership support, clinical champions, multidisciplinary collaboration, and a supportive organisational culture.
Conclusion:
This scoping review identifies determinants that can inform the selection of implementation strategies for tools in hospitals. Our findings suggest that tool implementation likely requires multi-faceted strategies capable of addressing barriers across multiple levels, from individual training to organisational leadership and culture. Future research should focus on evaluating tailored strategies that account for the unique complexities of different hospital contexts to ensure sustainable adoption.
DalgaardKMBergenholtzHNielsenME, et al. Early integration of palliative care in hospitals: a systematic review on methods, barriers, and outcome. Palliat Support Care2014; 12: 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951513001338
HighetGCrawfordDMurraySA, et al. Development and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): a mixed-methods study. BMJ Support Palliat Care2014; 4: 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000488
4.
MurtaghFERamsenthalerCFirthA, et al. A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS). Palliat Med2019; 33: 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319854264
5.
NeergaardMASkorstengaardMHBrogaardT, et al. Advance care planning and longer survival in the terminally ill: a randomised controlled trial unexpected finding. BMJ Support Palliat Care2020; 10: 221–222. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001906
6.
SkorstengaardMHJensenABAndreassenP, et al. Advance care planning and place of death, hospitalisation and actual place of death in lung, heart and cancer disease: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Support Palliat Care2020; 10: e37. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001677
7.
QureshiDTanuseputroPPerezR, et al. Early initiation of palliative care is associated with reduced late-life acute-hospital use: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Palliat Med2019; 33: 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216318815794
8.
BergenholtzHJarlbaekLHolge-HazeltonB.The culture of general palliative nursing care in medical departments: an ethnographic study. IntJ PalliatNurs2015; 21: 193–201. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2015.21.4.193
9.
BauseweinCDavesonBACurrowDC, et al. EAPC White Paper on outcome measurement in palliative care: improving practice, attaining outcomes and delivering quality services: recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Task Force on Outcome Measurement. Palliat Med2016; 30: 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216315589898
10.
De BockRVan Den NoortgateNPiersR. Validation of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool in a geriatric population. J Palliat Med2018; 21: 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0205
11.
DogbeyDMBurgerHEdgeJ, et al. Identification of palliative care needs in cancer patients in a surgical emergency center. J Pain Symptom Manage; 63(2):260–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.08.008
12.
MudgeAMDouglasCSansomeX, et al. Risk of 12-month mortality among hospital inpatients using the surprise question and SPICT criteria: a prospective study. BMJ Support Palliat Care2018; 8: 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001441
13.
AdsersenMHansenMBNeergaardMA, et al. The first decade of the Danish Palliative Care Database: improvements and ongoing challenges in the quality and use of specialised palliative care. Acta Oncol2024; 63: 259–266. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.28515
14.
WrightAAZhangBRayA, et al. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA2008; 300: 1665–1673. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.14.1665
15.
World Health Organization. Integrating palliative care and symptom relief into primary health care: a WHO guide for planners, implementers and managers. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/274559 (2018, accessed 22 July 2025).
16.
AldridgeMDHassesaarJGarraldaE, et al. Education, implementation, and policy barriers to greater integration of palliative care: a literature review. Palliat Med2016; 30(3): 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216315606645
17.
PendersYWOnwuteaka-PhilipsenBMoreelsS, et al. Differences in primary palliative care between people with organ failure and people with cancer: an international mortality follow-back study using quality indicators. Palliat Med2018; 32: 1498–1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216318790386
18.
Collingridge MooreDPayneSVan den BlockL, et al. Strategies for the implementation of palliative care education and organizational interventions in long-term care facilities: a scoping review. Palliat Med2020; 34: 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319893635
19.
DemirisGParker OliverDCapurroD, et al. Implementation science: implications for intervention research in hospice and palliative care. Gerontologist2014; 54: 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt022
van Riet PaapJVernooij-DassenMSommerbakkR, et al. Implementation of improvement strategies in palliative care: an integrative review. Implement Sci2015; 10: 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0293-2
22.
SommerbakkRHaugenDFTjoraA, et al. Barriers to and facilitators for implementing quality improvements in palliative care: results from a qualitative interview study in Norway. BMC Palliat Care2016; 15: 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0132-5
23.
AntunesBBarclaySKuhnI, et al. Implementing patient-centred outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice. an updated systematic review of facilitators and barriers. BMC Palliat Care2026; 25: 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-01997-2
24.
DamschroderLJReardonCMOpra WiderquistMA, et al. Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum. Implement Sci2022; 17: 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5
PetersMDJMarnieCTriccoAC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth2020; 18: 2119. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
29.
TriccoACLillieEZarinW, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med2018; 169: 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
30.
The Open Science Framework (OSF), Project: Implementation of Identification and Needs Assessment Tools in Hospitals: A Scoping Review Protocol; https://osf.io/rud7s/overview
31.
PetersMDJMarnieCTriccoAC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement2021; 19: 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000277
Van LummelEVTJMeijerYTjanDHT, et al. Barriers and facilitators for healthcare professionals to the implementation of Multidisciplinary Timely Undertaken Advance Care Planning conversations at the outpatient clinic (the MUTUAL intervention): a sequential exploratory mixed-methods study. BMC Palliat Care2023; 22: 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01139-y
34.
AnderssonSSandgrenA.Organizational readiness to implement the Serious Illness Care Program in hospital settings in Sweden. BMC Health Serv Res2022; 22: 539. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07923-5
35.
LindSWallinLFürstCJ, et al. The integrated palliative care outcome scale for patients with palliative care needs: factors related to and experiences of the use in acute care settings. Palliat Support Care2019; 17: 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951518001104
36.
PusaSBaxterRSandgrenA.Physicians’ perceptions of the implementation of the serious illness care program: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res2023; 23: 1401. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10419-5
37.
BauseweinCSchildmannERosenbruchJ, et al. Starting from scratch: implementing outcome measurement in clinical practice. Ann Palliat Med2018; 7: S253–S261. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2018.06.08
38.
Brown-JohnsonCHaverfieldMCGiannitrapaniKF, et al. Implementing goals-of-care conversations: lessons from high- and low-performing sites from a VA national initiative. J Pain Symptom Manage2021; 61: 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.040
39.
ErnecoffNAbdel-KaderKCaiM, et al. Implementation of surprise question assessments using the electronic health record in older adults with advanced CKD. Kidney3602021; 2: 966–973. https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0007062020
40.
GarciaPKimHJBarbourS, et al. Empowering nurses to increase engagement in advance care planning in a medicine transitional care unit: a best practice implementation project. JBI Evid Implement2023; 21: 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000373
41.
GoffSLUnruhMLKlingensmithJ, et al. Advance care planning with patients on hemodialysis: an implementation study. BMC Palliat Care2019; 18: 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0437-2
42.
LakinJRDesaiMEngelmanK, et al. Earlier identification of seriously ill patients: an implementation case series. BMJ Support Palliat Care2020; 10: e31. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001789
43.
MossAHHarbertGAldousA, et al. Pathways project pragmatic lessons learned: integrating supportive care best practices into real-world kidney care. Kidney3602023; 4: 1738–1751. https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000000000277
44.
PatelAKogekarNAgarwalR, et al. Improving advance care planning in outpatients with decompensated cirrhosis: a pilot study. J Pain Symptom Manage2020; 59: 864–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.355
45.
CathcartFWoodJMadgeS.Improving end-of-life care for adults with cystic fibrosis: an improvement project. BMJ Open Qual2020; 9: e000861. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000861
46.
MisselbrookGPJackmanDVoraC, et al. Implementing and improving the ReSPECT process within medical and orthopaedic departments of a district general hospital. Prog Palliat Care2020; 28: 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2019.1677985
47.
ThomasKArmstrong-WilsonJCliffordC.The Gold Standards Framework Hospital programme: implementation and progress. Int J Palliat Nurs2022; 28: 172–177. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.4.172
48.
ChiuHH-LMurphy-BurkeDMThomasSA, et al. Advancing palliative care in patients with CKD: from ideas to practice. Am J Kidney Dis2021; 77: 420–426. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.09.012
49.
DavisonSKlarenbachSMannsB, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in the care of in-centre hemodialysis patients. J Patient-Rep Outcomes2021; 5: 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00365-3
50.
EvansJMMackinnonMPereiraJ, et al. Integrating early palliative care into routine practice for patients with cancer: a mixed methods evaluation of the INTEGRATE Project. Psychooncology2019; 28: 1261–1268. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5076
51.
HartMStepitaRBerallA, et al. Development of an advance care planning policy within an evidenced-based evaluation framework. Am J Hosp Palliat Med2022; 39: 1389–1396. https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091221077057
52.
KarimSLevineOSimonJ.The serious illness care program in oncology: evidence, real-world implementation and ongoing barriers. Curr Oncol2022; 29: 1527–1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29030128
53.
HjorthNESchaufelMASigurdardottirKR, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study. BMJ Open Respir Res2020; 7: e000485. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000485
54.
MarshallKHRiddiford-HarlandDLMellerAE, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of facilitated advance care planning in outpatient clinics: a qualitative study of health-care professionals experience. Australas J Ageing2024; 43: 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13272
55.
SamaraJLarkinDChanCW, et al. Advance care planning in the oncology settings. Int J Evid Based Healthc2013; 11: 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-1609.12011
56.
ScottIARajakarunaNShahD, et al. Normalising advance care planning in a general medicine service of a tertiary hospital: an exploratory study. Aust Health Rev2016; 40: 391. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15068
57.
SongKAmatyaBKhanF.Advance care planning in rehabilitation: an implementation study. J Rehabil Med2018; 50: 652–660. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2356
58.
ChambersDAGlasgowREStangeKC.The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement Sci IS2013; 8: 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-117
59.
MayCRAlbersBBracherM, et al. Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development. Implement Sci2022; 17: 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x
60.
RossJStevensonFLauR, et al. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implement Sci IS2016; 11: 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7
61.
BrownDMcCormackB.Exploring psychological safety as a component of facilitation within the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework. J Clin Nurs2016; 25: 2921–2932. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13348
62.
BührmannLDriessenPMetzA, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of implementation support practitioners: findings from a systematic integrative review. PLoS ONE2022; 17: e0267533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267533
63.
FrilundMFagerstrømLVassetF.The challenges of change processes for nurse leaders: a qualitative study of long-term leaders’ experiences over 25 years. Nurs Open2023; 10: 5423–5432. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1781
64.
BianchiMBagnascoABressanV, et al. A review of the role of nurse leadership in promoting and sustaining evidence-based practice. J Nurs Manag2018; 26: 918–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12638
65.
MagidKHMurrayAHaverhalsLM, et al. Successful adoption of an advance care planning evidence-based practice: impact of clinical champion and site factors. Implement Sci2026; 21(1): 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-026-01483-6
66.
CaldwellDFChatmanJIiiCAO, et al. Implementing strategic change in a health care system: the importance of leadership and change readiness. Health Care Manage Rev2008; 33(2): 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hmr.0000304501.82061.e0
67.
FordJFordLPolinB.Leadership in the implementation of change: functions, sources, and requisite variety. J Change Manag2021; 21: 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1861697
68.
SheaCM.A conceptual model to guide research on the activities and effects of innovation champions. Implement Res Pract2021; 2: 2633489521990443. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633489521990443
69.
BirkenSClaryATabrizAA, et al. Middle managers’ role in implementing evidence-based practices in healthcare: a systematic review. Implement Sci2018; 13: 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0843-5
70.
FernandezMEten HoorGAvan LieshoutS, et al. Implementation mapping: using intervention mapping to develop implementation strategies. Front Public Health2019; 7: 158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158
TaylorMJMcNicholasCNicolayC, et al. Systematic review of the application of the plan–do–study–act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf2014; 23: 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
