Rape Reporting to the Police: Exploring the Social Psychological Impact of a Persuasive Campaign on Cognitions,Attitudes,Normative Expectations and Reporting Intentions *
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 1993
Rape Reporting to the Police: Exploring the Social Psychological Impact of a Persuasive Campaign on Cognitions,Attitudes,Normative Expectations and Reporting Intentions *
Sexual victimizations are generally under-reported to the police. Persuasive communication campaigns are suggested as a feasible instrument to stimulate victim-reporting. Determinants of reporting decisions are reviewed. This review results in a working model to design and evaluate such persuasion campaigns. In the experiment the social psychological impact of a specially designed persuasive programme is explored. Results suggest that this programme is successful in changing the perceived likelihood of positive outcomes associated with reporting, and in strengthening the perceived normative expectations to report, held by others in the potential victim's environment. Some suggestions for countering possible side-effects are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdriaansenA.C. (1983). De Hulpverlening aan Slachtoffers van Misdrijven. P.C.O.M.D.; 's Gravenhage.
2.
AmirM. (1971). Patterns inforcible rape. University of Chicago Press; Chicago.
3.
BurgessA.W.HolmstromL.L. (1975). Rape: Victims of Crisis. Bowie; Brady.
4.
Commission De Beaufot. (1981). Rapport van de Werkgroep Aangifte Sexuele Gewweldsmisdrijven. Miniserie van Justitie; 's Gravenhage.
5.
Davelaar-van TongerenV. (1980). Verkrachting: Strafrechter, wat moet je er mee? In Strafrecht in Perspectiefpp. 99–131. Gouda Quint; Amhem.
6.
DoomenJ. (1976). Verkrachting: Ervaringen, Vooroordeel, Achtergronden. In den Toren; Baarn.
7.
Feldman-SummersS.AshworthC.D. (1981). Factors related to intention to report a rape. Journal of Social Issues, 37/453–71.
8.
Feldman-SummersS.NorrisJ. (1984). Differences between rape victims who report and those who do not report to a public agency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14/6, 562–573.
9.
FrenkenJ.DoomenJ. (eds.) (1984). Strafbare Sexualiteit. Van Loghum-Slaterus; Deventer.
10.
GreenbergM.S.RubackR.B.WestcottD.R. (1982). Decision making by crime victims; a multimethod approach. Law and Society Review, 17/1, 47–85.
11.
GroenhuijsenM.S.Van KalmthoutA.M. (1984). Commentaar op het rapport van de Werkgroep Justitieel Beleid en Slachtoffers. Delikt en Delinkwent, 14/9, 836–851.
12.
HeusdenF.G. vanRemmeltsE.H. (1985). Slachtofferhulp: ons een zorg of onze zorg. Algemeen Politieblad, 8, 171–174.
13.
KiddR.F.ChayetE.F. (1984). Why do victims fail to report: the psychology of criminal victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 40/1, 39–50.
14.
LeuwE. (1985). De behandeling van verkrachtingszaken door de rechtbank. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 3, 129–151.
15.
LizotteA.J. (1985). The uniqueness of rape: reporting assaultive violence to the police. Crime and Delinquency, 31/2, 169–190.
16.
MolA. (1985). Realiteitszin in de misdaadbestrijding. Algemeen Politieblad, 8, 178–181.
17.
RubackR.B.GreenbergM.S.WestcottD.R. (1984). Social influence and crime victim decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 40/1, 51–76.
18.
ShaplandJ. (1982). Ervaringen van slachtoffers met politie en justitie in Engeland. Justitiele-Verkenningen, 6, 39–51.
19.
SkeltonC.A.BuckhartB.R. (1980). Sexual assault: determinants of victim disclosure. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 7/2, 229–236.
20.
SkoganW.G. (1984). Reporting crimes to the police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21/2, 113–137.
21.
SteinmetzC.H.D. (1983). Het verwerken van een emstig misdrijf: zelfhulp en hulp van anderen. Justitiele Verkenningen, 36–69.
22.
Van der HeijdenA.W.M. (1984). Seksuele criminaliteit: 1975–1982. Statistisch Magazine, 4/3, 41–54.
23.
Van der HeijdenA.W.M. (1985). Ongewenste sexuele intimiteiten in 1983. Statistisch Magazine, 5/2,45–56.
24.
Van DijkJ.J.M. (1982). De positie van det slachtoffer in het strafproces: achtergronden en perspectieven. Justitiele Verkenningen, 6, 10–21.
25.
VisserA.S.C. (1984). Veranderend denken over wetstoepassing bij sexuele delicten. In Strafbare Sexualiteit (FrenkenJ.DoomenJ., eds.). pp. 49–63. Van Loghum Slaterus; Deventer.
26.
WilliamsL.S. (1984). The classic rape: when do victims report. Social Prohlems, 31/4, 459–468.
27.
WinkelF.W.KoppelaarL. (1988). Police information for victims of crime: a research and training perspective from the Netherlands. Police Studies, 11/2, 72–82.
28.
WinkelF.W. (1989). Responses to criminal victimization: evaluating the impact of a police assistance program and some social psychological characteristics. Police Studies, 12/2, 59–73.
29.
WinkelF.W. (1989a). Increased fear of crime and related side-effects of persuasive communication: the price tag of burglary prevention campaigns? In Crime and its Victims: International Research and Public Policy Issues (VianoE.C., ed.) pp. 273–296. Hemisphere; New York.
30.
WinkelF.W.KoppelaarL. (1991). Rape victim's style of self-presentation and secondary victimization by the environment: an experiment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5/3, 29–41.
31.
WinkelF.W.SteinmetzC.H.D. (1990). Angst voor criminaliteit en het slachtoffer worden van een misdrijf: een schokverwerkingsmodel. In Angst voor Criminaliteit: Theorie, Onderzoek en Interventie (WinkelF.W.WurffA. v.d., eds.) pp. 22–48. Swets en Zeitlinger; Amsterdam.
32.
YantziM.BrownS.D. (1983). Behoeften van slachtoffers van misdrijven. Justitiele Verkenningen, 6, 86–93.
