Citizens of Western democracies have long believed that the media should serve as watchdogs. Many feel one of the media’s most important watchdog duties is environmental reporting. As human progress has undoubtedly caused significant changes in the ecosystem, citizens have increasingly depended on the media to inform us about possible ill effects thereof. Though critics from both right and left have reservations about the actual fulfillment of this role by the press, most uphold environmental reporting in principle. Hence, environmental journalism is growing in stature and respect. Even so, the work of Jacques Ellul puts forth an analysis of the watchdog function of the press that challenges key tenets of the liberal democratic presuppositions of our technological society. His analysis, which is of neither the right nor the left, raises questions that anyone who thinks seriously about the media and the environment should ponder, even those who ultimately disagree with Ellul’s position.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bromiley, G. W. (1981). Barth’s influence on Jacques Ellul. In C. G. Christians & J. M. Van Hook (Eds.), Jacques Ellul: Interpretive essays(pp. 32-51). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
2.
Christians, C. G. (1976). Jacques Ellul and democracy’s ‘vital information’ premise. Journalism Monographs, 45, 1-42.
3.
Chepesiuk, R. (1993). Covering the environmental beat: Nation’s top policymakers address the society of Environmental Journalists conference; members discuss ‘politically driven’ backlash against environmental concerns. Editor & Publisher, 126(51), 18-19, 46-46.
4.
Darling, J. (2001, January 17). Wondering who’s at fault in the path destruction. Los Angeles Times, p. A10-A10.
5.
Eller, V. (1981). Ellul and Kierkegaard: Closer than brothers. In C. G. Christians & J. M. Van Hook (Eds.), Jacques Ellul: Interpretive essays(pp. 52-66). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
6.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society(J. Wilkinson, Trans.). New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1954)
7.
Ellul, J. (1965). Propaganda(K. Kellen & J. Lerner, Trans.). New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1962)
8.
Ellul, J. (1967). The political illusion(K. Kellen, Trans.). New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1965)
9.
Ellul, J. (1972). The politics of God and the politics of man(G. W. Bromiley, Trans.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. (Original work published 1966)
10.
Ellul, J. (1978). The betrayal of the West(M. J. O’Connell, Trans.). New York: Seabury. (Original work published 1975)
11.
Ellul, J. (1984). Money and power(L. Neff, Trans.). Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship. (Original work published 1954)
12.
Ellul, J. (1989). What I believe(G. Bromiley, Trans.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. (Original work published 1987)
13.
Ellul, J. (1990). The technological bluff(G. Bromiley, Trans.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. (Original work published 1986)
14.
Gleason, T. (1990) The watchdog concept: The press and the courts in nineteenth-century America. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
15.
Keating, M. (1997). Three decades on the green beat. Alternatives Journal, 23(1), 11-13.
16.
Kellner, D. (1990). Television and the crisis of democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Lichter, R., & Rothman, S. (1999). Environmental cancer: A political disease?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Lichter, R., Rothman, S., & Lichter, L. (1986). The media elite. New York: Adler & Adler.
19.
Liebler, C. M., & Bendix, J. (1996). Old-growth forests on network news: News sources and the framing of an environmental controversy. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 53-65.
20.
Lyman, F. (1994). Mudslinging on the earth-beat. The Amicus Journal, 15, 39-39.
21.
Menninger, D. C. (1981). Marx in the social thought of Jacques Ellul. In C. G. Christians & J. M. Van Hook (Eds.), Jacques Ellul: Interpretive essays(pp. 17-31). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
22.
Nash, R. (1989). The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
23.
Palen, J. (1999). It’s not easy being green. Editor & Publisher, 21, 16-16.
24.
Parisi, P. (1997). Toward a “philosophy of framing”: News narratives for public journalism. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 673-686.
25.
Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
26.
Roy, C. (1992). Aux sources de l’ecologie politique: Le personalisme “gascon” de Bernard Charbonneau et Jacques Ellul. Annales Canadiennes d’histoire, 27, 67-100.
27.
Salomone, K. L., Greenberg, M. R., Sandman, P. M., & Sachsman, D. B. (1990). A question of quality: How journalists and news sources evaluate coverage of environmental risk. Journal of Communication, 40, 117-130.
28.
Stanley, J. L. (1981). The uncertain Hobbesian: Ellul’s dialogue with the sovereign and the tradition of French politics. In C. G. Christians & J. M. Van Hook (Eds.), Jacques Ellul: Interpretive essays(pp. 69-90). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
29.
Taylor, C. E., Lee, J., & Davie, W. R. (2000). Local press coverage of environmental conflict. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 175-192.
