Prenatal diagnostic technologies have been used for the purpose of detecting sex—leading to abortion of female fetuses—and have posed new challenges to the already difficult question of social justice for women in India. This article reports findings from a case study conducted with 25 women who had used prenatal diagnostic technologies for sex determination.Against the common belief that Indian society is “improving” because of 21st-century medical technology, this case study shows that the social context has given a patriarchal value to such advanced technology in India. Furthermore, it sheds light on why prenatal diagnostic technologies have taken a different route in India.It shows that reasons for accepting the use of prenatal diagnostic technologies for sex determination by women are diverse and complex.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agnes, F.
(1992). Protecting women against violence?Economic and Political Weekly, 27, WS19-WS34.
2.
Arora, D.
(1996). The victimizing discourse: Sex-determination technologies and policy. Economic and Political Weekly, 31, 420-424.
3.
Basu, A.
(1992). Culture, status of women and demographic behavior. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
4.
Booth, B. E.
, Verma, M., & Buri, R. S. (1994). Foetal sex determination in infants in Punjab, India: Correlation and implications. British Medical Journal, 309, 1259-1261.
5.
Bose, A.
(2001). Census of India 2001 and after. Economic and Political Weekly, 36, 1685-1687.
6.
Census of India Series
I. (2001). India provisional population totals, paper 1 of 2001. New Delhi, India: Registrar General.
7.
Chauhan, B.
(1998, March 20-21). Socio-legal implications of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Act 1994. Paper presented at the Workshop on Prenatal Sex-Determination and the Critical Aspects of Female Foeticide, Vatsalya, Lucknow, India.
8.
Forum Against Sex Determination and Sex Pre-Selection
. (1994). Using technology, choosing sex: The campaign against sex determination and the question of choice. In V. Shiva (Ed.), Close to home: Women reconnect ecology, health and development worldwide (pp. 527-534). New Delhi, India: Kali for Women.
9.
George, S. M.
, & Dahiya, R. S. (1998). Female foeticide in rural Haryana. Economic and Political Weekly, 33, 2191-2198.
10.
Is it a boy? [Editorial]
. (1990). Lancet, 336, 87-88.
11.
Kakodkar, P.
(1997, June 5). Sex determination tests continue in Maharashtra. The Times of India,p.7-7.
12.
Kapur, D.
, Khan, S., & Radhakrishnan, A. (1999). Female infanticide and foeticide: A legal perspective. Banglore: National School of India.
13.
Kishwar, M.
(1995). When daughters are unwanted: Sex determination tests in India. Manushi, 86, 15-22.
14.
Krishnaswamy, S.
(1988). Female infanticide in contemporary India. In R. Ghadially (Ed.), Women in Indian society: A reader (pp. 90-114). New Delhi, India: Sage.
15.
Kumar, S.
(1994). Legislation on prenatal sex determination in India. Lancet, 344, 399-399.
16.
Lingam, L.
(1998). Sex detection tests and female foeticide: Discrimination before birth. In L. Lingam (Ed.), Understanding women’s health issues: A reader (pp. 209-218). New Delhi, India: Kali for Women.
17.
Muzumdar, K.
(1998). Women and violence: A human rights perspective. In S. Kudchedkar & S. Al-Issa (Eds.), Violence against women: Women against violence (pp. 28-48). New Delhi, India: Pencraft International.
18.
Rajan, S. I.
, Mishra, U. S., & Vimala, T. K. (1996). Choosing a permanent contraceptive: Does son preference matter?Economic and Political Weekly, 31, 1980-1984.
19.
Ravindra, R. P.
(1987). Struggle against sex determination techniques: Unfinished battle. Economic and Political Weekly, 22, 490-492.
20.
Singh, N.
(1998, March 20-21). Technical session. Paper presented in the Workshop on Prenatal Sex-Determination and the Critical Aspects of Female Foeticide, Vatsalya, Lucknow, India.
21.
Vatsalya
. (1998, March 20-21). Workshop on prenatal sex-determination and the critical aspects of female foeticide. Lucknow, India: Author.
22.
Vatsalya
. (2000). People’s perceptions on female foeticide in Uttar Pradesh: A study. Lucknow, India: Author.
23.
Volti, R.
(1995). Society and technological change. New York: St. Martin’s.
24.
Weinberg, A. M.
(1997). Can technology replace social engineering? In A. H. Teich (Ed.), Technology and the man’s future (pp. 55-64). New York: St. Martin’s.
25.
Weiss, R.
(1996, May 11). Anti-girl bias rises in Asia, studies show: Abortion augmenting infanticide. The Washington Post, p. A1-A1.
26.
Women voice concern over female foeticide. (1998, March 21).The Times of India,p.14-14.
