A clean energy future is both plausible and in the best interests of the country. The Upper Midwest, acting in concert with appropriate policy changes at the national level, could play a pivotal role in helping the nation move in that direction. As the past century’s embrace of centralized power is beginning to weaken, a variety of policy drivers, including concerns about energy system capacity and reliability, the improvement of public health by reducing pollution, the enhancement of national security by decreased reliance on nuclear power, and the need to curtail greenhouse gas emissions, are beginning to make clear the outlines of this energy transition. The proposals offered by the Environmental Lawand Policy Center and Minnesotans for an Energy-Efficient Economy rely on proven, economical, and environmentally sustainable technology options. An aggressive development plan featuring efficiency, wind, and other renewable resources will be a significant first step in solving the climate change problem.
American Wind Energy Association. (2001, November). Retrieved from http://www.awea.org
2.
Bolinger, M.
, et al. (2001, November). States emerge as clean energy investors: A review of state support for renewable energy. Electricity Journal, 14(9), 82-95.
3.
Brower, M.
, & Tennis, M. (1993). Powering the Midwest: Renewable electricity for the economy and the environment. Washington, DC: Union of Concerned Scientists.
4.
Chang, K.
(2001, December 12). Drastic shifts in climate are likely, experts warn. NewYork Times.
5.
Committee on Abrupt Climate Change
. (2001, December). Abrupt climate changes: Inevitable surprises (National Research Council). Retrieved from books.nap.edu/books/0309074347/html
6.
Environmental Law and Policy Center
. (2001). Repowering the Midwest: The clean energy development plan for the heartland. Chicago: Author.
7.
Environmental Media Services
. (2000). Lighten the load. Retrieved from http://www.ems.org/lighten_the_load/
8.
Hamilton, J.
And Johnson, S. (2002). Playing with fire (3rd ed.). Saint Paul: Minnesotans for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
9.
Hayes, D. Presentation to Star Tribune editorial board and author. February 2000.
10.
Hoffman, S.
(2001). Negotiating eternity: Energy policy, environmental justice, and the politics of nuclear waste. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 21(6), 456-472.
11.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
. (1990). IPCC scientific assessment report, overview and policymaker summaries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
. (1995). Climate change 1995: Impacts, adaptations, and mitigation. Summary for policymakers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
. (2001). Summary for policymakers: Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Izaak Walton League of American and Clean Water Fund
. (1998). The mercury handbook. St. Paul, MN: Authors.
15.
Koehler, T. (2001, December). Business agent for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 160, personal communication.
16.
Mariotte, M.
(2001). When everything changes, everything does change. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(5), 501-506.
17.
McWilliams, M. McWilliams Cosgrove, personal communication. October 14, 2001.
18.
Minnesota Department of Commerce
. (2000, September). Keeping the lights on. St. Paul, MN: Author. Retrieved from www.dpsv.state.mn.us/docs/infocntr/special/pdfs/DraftReport.pdf
19.
Minnesota Department of Commerce
. (2001, October). Minnesota energy planning report (draft).St. Paul, MN: Author.
20.
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC)
. (1999, February). Docket No. E-002/RP-98-32. Retrieved from http://www.puc.state.mn.us/docs/orders/99-40.pdf
21.
Minnesotans for an Energy-Efficient Economy. (2000, October). Draft energy vision report (unpublished).
22.
Morris, D.
(2001). Seeing the light: Regaining control of our electricity system. Minneapolis, MN: Institute for Local Self-Reliance.
23.
Nadel, S.
and Kushler, M. (2000, October). Public benefit funds: a key strategy for advancing energy efficiency.Electricity Journal: 74-84.
24.
Noble, M.
, & Palmer, F. (2000, February). Debate between Greening Earth Society president and ME3 executive director, Minnesota Rural Electric Association Annual Meeting. Retrieved from www.me3.org/issues/climate/me3wfdebate.html
25.
Rader, N.
(2000). The hazards of implementing renewable portfolio standards. Energy and Environment, 11(4), 391-405.
26.
Scott, A.
(2001, December). Interior’s ulterior motive: Behind the scenes at the Bush administration’s renewable energy summit. Retrieved from www.gristmagazine.com
27.
Wasserman, H.
(2001, October 18). Public lecture on nuclear power and energy options. Given at the University of St. Thomas. St. Paul, MN.
28.
Wind, T.
(2000a, July). Draft analysis for Minnesota energy vision project. St. Paul: Minnesotans for an Energy-Efficient Economy, internal memorandum.
29.
Wind, T.
(2000b, January). Projected impact of a renewable portfolio standard on Iowa’s electricity prices. Retrieved from http://www.iowawind.org/factsheets/tomwind.pdf
30.
Wind, T.
(2001, March) Projected impact of renewable portfolio standard on Minnesota’s electricity prices. Retrieved from http://www.powercampaign.org/files/MN-RPS-study.pdf
31.
Wiser, R.
, & Langniss, O. (2001). The renewables portfolio standard in Texas: An early assessment. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www-library.lbl.gov/docs/LBNL/491/07/PDF/LBNL-49107.pdf
32.
Wiser, R.
, Porter, K., & Clemmer, S. (2000, January/February). Emerging markets for renewable energy: The role of state policies during restructuring. Electricity Journal, pp. 13-24.
