Mercury contamination of local fish stocks has become an escalating problem in the United States. Federal and state governments increasingly have issued fish consumption advisories to warn individuals of the risks of eating specific species of fish in particular quantities from individual bodies of water. Some indigenous groups in the United States who rely on these fisheries for subsistence and ritual cultural reasons have become disproportionately impacted by the risks of mercury contamination of their food source. Some of these groups are forced to make a decision whether to continue their cultural life ways and become exposed to mercury or to stop eating fish and witness the degradation of their identity. This article explores the unique conditions of cultural fishing practices among Native American groups in the United States and their disproportionate risk to mercury contamination.Spatial analysis using the geographical information systems software is accompanied by two case studies to explore the risks faced by indigenous communities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balogh, S., Meyer, M., & Johnson, K. (1998). Diffuse and point source mercury inputs to the Mississippi, Minnesota, and St. Croix rivers. The Science of the Total Environment, 213, 109-113.
2.
Bernhard, S., Enayati, A., Redwood, L., Roger, H., & Binstock, T. (2001). Autism: A novel form of mercury poisoning. Medical Hypotheses, 56(4), 462-471.
Cocca, P. (2001, September 10). Mercury maps: A quantitative spatial link between air deposition and fish tissue, peer reviewed final report(EPA-823-R-01-009). Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency, Standards and Health Protection Division, Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water.
5.
Cook, A. R. (1997). Environmentally induced disorders sourcebook. Detroit, MI: Omnigraphics.
6.
Dvonch, J. T., Graney, J. R., Marsik, F. J., Keeler, G. J., & Stevens, R. K. (1998). An investigation of source-receptor relationships for mercury in South Florida using event precipitation data. The Science of the Total Environment, 213, 98-108.
7.
Ganguli, P. M., Mason, R. P., Abu-Saba, K. E., Anderson, R. S., & Flegal, A. R. (2000). Mercury speciation in drainage from the New Idria Mercury Mine, California. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(22), 4773-4779.
8.
Hoff, R. M., Strachan, W. J. J., Sweet, C. W., Chan, C. H., Shackleton, M., Bidleman, T. F., et al. (1996). Atmospheric deposition of toxic chemicals to the Great Lakes: Areviewof data through 1994. Atmospheric Environment, 30(20), 3505-3527.
9.
Hudson, R. J. M., Gherini, S. A., Watras, C., & Porcella, D. B. (1994). Modeling the biochemical cycle of mercury in lakes: The mercury cycling model (MCM) and its application to the MTL study lakes. In C. J. Watras (Ed.), Mercury pollution: Integration and synthesis. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
10.
Hurley, J. P., Cowell, S. E., Schafer, M. M., & Hughes, P. E. (1998). Tributary loading of mercury to Lake Michigan: Importance of seasonal events and phase partitioning. The Science of the Total Environment, 213, 129-137.
11.
Jewell, S. D. (1999, July). Conservation on Seminole lands in Florida. Endangered Species Bulletin, 24(4), 22-22.
12.
Kehrig, H. A., Malm, O., & Akagi, H. (1997). Methyl-mercury in hair samples from different riverine groups, Amazon, Brazil. In B. Wheatley & R. Wyzga (Eds.), Mercury as a global pollutant: Human health issues. Boston: Kluwer. (Proceedings of the fourth International Conference, August 4-8, 1996, Hamburg, Germany)
13.
Krogseng, K. (2000, August). Minnesota v. Mille Lacs band of Chippewa Indians. Ecological Law Quarterly, 27(3), 771-797.
14.
Loew, P. (1997, fall). Hidden transcripts in the Chippewa Treaty rights struggle: A twice told story of race, resistance, and the politics of power. American Indian Quarterly, 21(4), 713 (1).
15.
Louchouarn, P., & Lucotte, M. (1998). A historical reconstruction of organic and inorganic contamination events in the Saguenay Fjord/St. Lawrence system from preindustrial times to the present. The Science of the Total Environment, 213, 139-150.
16.
Mahaffey, K. R., & Mergler, D. (1998). Blood levels of total and organic mercury in residents of the Upper St. Lawrence RiverBasin, Qubec: Association with age, gender, and fish consumption. Environmental Research, 77, 104-114.
17.
Marvin-Dipasquale, M., Agee, J., McGowan, C., Oremland, R. S., Thomas, M., Krabbenhoft, D., & Gilmour, C. C. (2000). Methyl-mercury degradation pathways: A comparison among three mercury-impacted ecosystems. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(23), 4908-4916.
18.
Neumann, C. M., Kauffman, K. W., & Gilroy, D. J. (1997). Methylmercury in fish from Owyhee Reservoir in southeast Oregon: Scientific uncertainty and fish advisories. The Science of the Total Environment, 201, 205-214.
19.
Peterson, D. E., Kanarek, M., Kuykendall, M. A., Diedrich, J. M., Anderson, H. A., Remington, P. L., et al. (1994, January-February). Fish consumption patterns and blood mercury levels in the Wisconsin Chippewa Indians. Archives of Environmental Health, 49(1), 53-58.
20.
Raloff, J. (2001, July 7). Landfills make mercury more toxic. Science News Online, 160(1). Retrieved October 2001, from www.sciencenews.org/20010707/fob1.asp
21.
Ringquist, E. J. (2000). Environmental justice: Normative concerns and empirical evidence. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy(4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ.
22.
Schroeder, W. H., & Munthe, J. (1998). Atmospheric mercury— An overview. Atmospheric Environment, 32(5), 809-822.
23.
Seminole Water Commission: Notice of Intent to Issue Proposed Rules to Protect Water Quality. (1994, February 4). Seminole Tribune, 26(13), 6-6.
24.
Shore, J. (2000, January 28). Tribe linked to Glades: Statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works on Jan. 7, 2000, in Naples (Reprint). Seminole Tribune, 21(1), 2-2.
25.
Simonin, H. A., & Meyer, M. W. (1998, August). Mercury and other air toxics in the Adirondack region ofNew York. Environmental Science and Policy, 1(8), 199-209.
26.
Tamargo, N. (1994, November 30). Relocation through toxification: Traditional Seminoles and incinerators. The Circle, 15(11), 5-5.
27.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1997). Mercury study report to Congress(Nos. EPA-452/R-97-003 through 006). Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001). Fact sheet: Mercury update: Impact on fish advisories(No. EPA-823-F-01-011). Washington, DC: Author, Office of Water.
30.
Wheatley, M. A. (1997). Social and cultural impacts of mercury pollution on aboriginal peoples in Canada. In B. Wheatley & R. Wyzga (Eds.), Mercury as a global pollutant: Human health issues. Boston: Kluwer. (Proceedings of the fourth International Conference, August 4-8, 1996, Hamburg, Germany)
