The Role of Innovation Regimes and Policy for Creating Radical Innovations: Comparing Some Aspects of Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Technology Development With the Development of Internet and GSM
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2006
The Role of Innovation Regimes and Policy for Creating Radical Innovations: Comparing Some Aspects of Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Technology Development With the Development of Internet and GSM
Telegraphy, the distant ancestor of Internet and GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications), was invented by Samuel Morse in 1838. One year later, William Grove invented the fuel cell. Although numerous highly successful innovations stemming from telegraphy may be observed, the development of fuel cells has been insignificant, slow, and erratic and has not yet resulted in notable positive socioeconomic effects. By comparing the modern development of fuel cells and hydrogen technology, that is, a potential radical innovation in energy generation, with some aspects related to the evolution of two highly successful radical innovations, Internet and GSM, the author focuses on the role of innovation regimes and policy in a sectorial system of innovations perspective. In the slow pace in fuel cells and hydrogen technology development, two factors seem to interact negatively: weak and fragmented innovation regimes in the energy sector and the current hegemony of market-oriented R&D policies.
Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy,14, 3-22.
2.
Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. In C. Edquist (Ed.),Systems of innovations(pp. 130-155). London: Pinter.
4.
Chesbrough, H. W., & Teece, D. J. (1996). When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovations. Harvard Business Review74(1), 65-73.
5.
Coombs, R. (1988). Technological opportunities and industrial organisation. In G. Dosi, C.Freeman, R.Nelson, G.Silverman, & L. Soete (Eds.),Technical change and economic theory(pp. 295-308). London: Pinter.
6.
Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature,xxvi, 1120-1171.
7.
Edquist, C. (2004). The fixed Internet and mobile telecommunications sectoral system of innovation: Equipment production, access provision and content provision. In F. Malerba (Ed.), Sectoral systems of innovation (pp. 155-192). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Godø, H., Nerdrum, L., Rapmund, A., & Nygaard, S. (2003). Innovations in fuel cells and related hydrogen technology in Norway: OECD case study in the energy sector (No. NIFU skriftserie 35/2003). Oslo: NIFU - Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Education.
9.
Godoe, H. (2000). Innovation regimes, R&D and radical innovations in telecommunications. Research Policy,29, 1003-1046.
10.
Godoe, H., & Nygaard, S. (2006). System failure, innovation policy and patents: Fuel cells and related hydrogen technology in Norway 1990-2002. Energy Policy,34(13), 1697-1708.
11.
Hall, J., & Kerr, R. (2003). Innovation dynamics and environmental technologies: The emergence of fuel cell technology. Journal of Cleaner Production,11, 459-471.
12.
Haug, M. (2004). Challenges to achieving breakthrough in new/ renewable energy technologies (p. 5). Retrieved from http://www.iea.org/textbase/speech/2004/haug/mh_bonn.pdf
13.
Krasner, S. D. (1985). International regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life—The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
15.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.),Technical change and economic theory(pp. 277-300). London: Pinter.
16.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (1993). User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalization. In D. Foray & C. Freeman (Eds.),Technology and the wealth of the nations— The dynamics of constructed advantage (pp. 349-369). London: Pinter.
17.
Maeda, A. (2003). Japanese technology policy for the development and commercialization of fuel cells. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
18.
Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation: Basic concepts. In F. Malerba (Ed.),Sectoral systems of innovation (pp. 9-35). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Mokyr, J. (1990). The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
Mowery, D. C., & Simcoe, T. (2002). Is the Internet a US invention? An economic and technological history of computer networking. Research Policy,31, 1369-1387.
21.
Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.),National innovation systems—A comparative analysis (pp. 3-21). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Innovation in energy technology: Synthesis report(No. DSTI/STP/TIP (2005)1/REV1). Paris: Author.
23.
Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.),Resources and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 327-399). Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.
24.
Sahal, D. (1985). Technological guideposts and innovation avenues. Research Policy,14, 61-82.
25.
Steinemann, P. P. (1999, November). R&D strategies for new automotive technologies: Insights from fuel cells (International Motor Vehicle Program, MIT). Retrieved from http://imvp.mit.edu/papers/99fuelcell.pdf
26.
Tubbs, M. (2005, March-April). EU scoreboard reveals need for industrial R&D champs. Research-Technology Management, 48(2), 5-8.
27.
Utterbach, J. M., & Suarez, F. F. (1993). Innovation, competition and industrial structure. Research Policy,22, 1-21.
28.
Wald, M. L. (2004, May). Questions about a hydrogen economy. Scientific American,292, 40-48.
29.
Wolff, M. F. (2003, September-October). 20 largest R&D spending industries in 2003 and 2004 (by SIC Group). Research-Technology Management,46(5), 6-6.
