This article traces the historical development of the boundaries around computer software and hardware. On one hand, the author documents ongoing discussions about the technical equivalence of hardware and software. On the other hand, he accounts for the stubborn persistence of these terms as markers for two distinct spheres of technology, knowledge, and practice. By using theoretical concepts such as “boundary work” and “coproduction,” the author argues that ongoing efforts to negotiate the boundaries between hardware and software are significantly “sociotechnical” in that they involve both social and technical considerations. The analysis culminates with a discussion of the more recent rise of the “hardware/software codesign” movement. Particular emphasis is placed on the conditions that led to the emergence of codesign and the ongoing challenges faced by its proponents. The article concludes by describing how codesign points toward a more reflexive and socially responsible culture of computer design and use.
ACM Curriculum Committee on Computer Science. (1968). Curriculum 68: Recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 11(3), 151-197.
2.
Akera, A. (1998). Calculating a natural world: Scientists, engineers, and computers in the United States, 1937-1968. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Carr, J. W., III. (1956). Conference summary. In Proceedings of the Eastern Joint Computer Conference, New York, NY, December 12, 1956 (pp. 147-150). New York: American Institute of Electrical Engineers.
5.
Carr, J. W., III. (1962). Better computers. Elektronische Rechenanlagen, 4(4), 157-160.
6.
Carr, J. W., III. (1965). The future of programming and programmers. Computers and Automation, 14(1), 15-17, 54-54.
7.
Coates, C. L., Jr., Arden, B., Bartee, T. C., Bell, C. G., Kuo, F. F., McCluskey, E. J., Jr., et al. (1971). An undergraduate computer engineering option for electrical engineering. Proceedings of the IEEE, 59(6), 854-860.
8.
COSINE Committee, Commission on Engineering Education. (1967, September). Computer sciences in electrical engineering. Washington, DC: COSINE Committee.
9.
COSINE Committee, Commission on Engineering Education. (1968). Computer science in electrical engineering. IEEE Spectrum, 5(3), 96-103.
10.
COSINE Committee, Commission on Engineering Education. (1970, January). An undergraduate computer engineering option for electrical engineering. Washington, DC: COSINE Committee.
11.
A Datamation staff survey of computer components ’61. (1961, August). Datamation, 7(8), 36-40.
12.
Denning, P. J., Comer, D., Gries, D., Mulder, M. C., Tucker, A. B., Turner, A. J., et al. (1989). Computing as a discipline. Communications of the ACM, 32(1), 9-23.
13.
Ernst, R., & Borriello, G. (1997). Message from the workshop chairs. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Hardware/Software Co-Design, 1997 (CODES/CASHE ’97), March 24-26, 1997 (p. viii-viii). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
14.
Fischer, G. (2002). Beyond “couch potatoes”: From consumers to designers and active contributors. First Monday, 7(12). Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue7_12/fischer/index.html
15.
Franke, D. W., & Purvis, M. K. (1991). Hardware/software code-sign: A perspective. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, Austin, TX. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
16.
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781-795.
17.
Gieryn, T. F. (1995). Boundaries of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (Rev. ed., pp. 393-443). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Golinski, J. (1998). Making natural knowledge: Constructivism and the history of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Gorn, S. (1958). Letters to the editor. Communications of the ACM, 1(1), 2-4.
21.
Gorn, S. (1959, September). On the logical design of formal mixed languages. In Preprints of papers presented at the 14th National Meeting of the Association for Computing Machinery (p. 25-31). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press.
22.
Grosch, H. R. J. (1961). Software in sickness and health. Datamation, 7(7), 32-33.
23.
Hopper, G. M. (1953). Compiling routines. Computers and Automation, 2(4), 1-5.
24.
Hopper, G. M., & Mauchly, J. W. (1953). Influence of programming techniques on the design of computers. Proceedings of the I.R.E., 41(10), 1250-1254.
25.
Householder, A. S. (1956). Presidential address to the ACM, Philadelphia, September 14, 1955. Journal of the ACM, 3(1), 1-2.
26.
Institute of Radio Engineers Professional Group on Electronic Computers. (1952). Foreword. Transactions of the I.R.E. Professional Group on Electronic Computers, 1(1), 1-1.
27.
Institute of Radio Engineers Professional Group on Electronic Computers. (1953). Editorial. Transactions of the I.R.E. Professional Group on Electronic Computers, 2(1), 1-1.
28.
Irwin, D. J., & Ramamoorthy, C. V. (1975). Guest editor’s introduction. Computer, 8(12), 26-27.
29.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
30.
Joint Task Force on Computer Engineering Curricula. (2004, December). Computer curricula: Computer engineering (final report). Retrieved February 10, 2005, from http://www.eng.auburn.edu/ece/CCCE/CCCE-FinalReport-2004Dec12.pdf
31.
Light, J. S. (1999). When computers were women. Technology and Culture, 40(3), 455-483.
32.
MacKenzie, D. (1990). Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
MacWilliams, W. H., Jr. (1951). Keynote address. In Review of Electronic Digital Computers: Joint AIEE-IRE Computer Conference, Philadelphia, PA, December 10-12, 1951 (pp. 5-6). New York: American Institute of Electrical Engineers.
34.
Mauchly, J. W. (1948). Preparation of problems for EDVAC-type machines. In Proceedings of a symposium on large-scale digital calculating machinery, Cambridge, MA, January 7-10, 1947 (pp. 203-207). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Mesa Scientific Corporation. (1964). Mesa men [advertisement]. Datamation, 10(11), 45-45.
36.
Mulder, M. C. (1975, December). Model curricula for four-year computer science and engineering programs: Bridging the tar pit. Computer, 8(12), 28-33.
37.
Rose, C. W., & Albarran, M. (1975). Modeling and design description of hierarchical hardware/software systems. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Design Automation (pp. 421-430). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
38.
Serra, M., & Gardner, W. B. (1998). A first course in hardware/software codesign. In Third Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (WCCCE ’98), Vancouver, BC, May 1998 (pp. 57-66). Retrieved May 6, 2004, from http://www.uoguelph.ca/%7Egardnerw/pubs/WCCCE98.pdf
39.
Shapiro, F. R. (2000). Origin of the term software: Evidence from the JSTOR electronic journal archive. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 22(2), 69-69.
40.
Should we merge with the ACM and leave the IEEE? An interview with Dr. Albert S. Hoagland, president of the IEEE Computer Society. (1972, May/June). Computer, 5(3), 1-1.
41.
Tanenbaum, A. S. (1976). Structured computer organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42.
Tucker, A. B. (Ed.). (1990). Computing Curricula 1991: Report of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. Pasadena, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
43.
Van der Spiegel, J., Tau, J. F., Ala’ilima, T. F., & Ang, L. P. (2000). The ENIAC: History, operation, and reconstruction in VLSI. In R. Rojas & U. Hashagen (Eds.), The first computers: History and architecture (pp. 69-87). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
Williams, S. B. (1954). The Association for Computing Machinery. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 1(1), 1-3.
