Science Teaching and Learning in Future Higher Education: Future-Oriented Projects of Interdisciplinary Science Curriculum Development (The Israeli Connection)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 1984
Science Teaching and Learning in Future Higher Education: Future-Oriented Projects of Interdisciplinary Science Curriculum Development (The Israeli Connection)
Technological developments affect and disturb all aspects of human existence and values more than any other factor in our modern man-made world. This calls for responsive higher education which will produce better decision-makers capable of being actively, rationally, and creatively involved in the continuous search for solutions to our current and future problems in a world of conflicting interests and values. Consequently, science teaching in future higher education should be drastically changed in order to be relevant to needs of both students and society rather than to reflect the needs of the disciplines per se.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ZollerU., “Interdisciplinary Decision-Making Science Curriculum in the Modern Socio-Technological Context; Relevance Assurance of Contemporary (and Future) Science Teaching,” in World Trends in Science Education, HarrisonG.B. (Ed.), U.K., 1983 (in press).
2.
ZollerU., and WatsonF.G. “Technology Education for the Non-Science Students in the Secondary School,” Science Education58, 105-116 (1974).
3.
ZollerU. “Chemistry of Man's Environment, An Undergraduate Chemistry Teacher Training Program,” Journal of Chemical Education54, 398-401 (1977).
4.
ZollerU., “Technology (and Science) for Social Action, An Alternative Curriculum Model for Science Teaching,” SISCON Newsletter7, 3-5 (1978).
5.
ZollerU., “Strategies for Environmental Education within Contemporary Science Education,” European Journal of Science Education (submitted for publication).
6.
LucasA.M., “Science and Environmental Education: Pious Hopes, Self Praise, Disciplinary Chauvinism,” Studies in Science Education7, 1-26 (1980).
7.
ZollerU., and WeissS., “The Issue of 'Sensitive' Interdisciplinary Science-Oriented Curricula in the Social Service,” European Journal of Science Education5, 147-155 (1983).
8.
ZollerU., “Decision-Making in Future Science and Technology Curricula,” European Journal of Science Education4, 11-17 (1982).
9.
ZollerU., and WeissS., “'Hashish and Marijuana'–A Chemistry in the Social Service Curriculum,” Journal of Chemical Education58, 42-43 (1981).
10.
BloomB.S. (Ed.), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1. Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay (1956).
11.
ZollerU., “Innovative Teaching Strategies in Science Teachers Education,” in Preservice and Inservice Education of Science Teachers, TamirP. (Eds.), Balaban International, The Weizman Institute of Science, Israel (1983), pp. 215–221.
12.
ZollerU., “Smoking and Cigarette Smoke,” Journal of Chemical Education56, 518-519 (1979).
13.
ZollerU., “Long-Term Environmental Trade-Offs in Recycling of Irrigation Water in Agriculture,” Water Reuse11 (2), 1058–1064 (1981).
14.
ZollerU., “The Eclectic Examination: A Model for Simultaneous Formative Evaluation of Teacher Training Program sand Consequent Student Performance,” Studies in Educational Evaluation9 (3), 353-360 (1983).
