A modern clustering technique was applied to age-10 and age-13 sociometric data with the purpose of identifying longitudinally stable peer status clusters. The study included 445 girls from a Swedish longitudinal study. The identified temporally stable clusters of rejected, popular, and average girls were essentially larger than corresponding groups identified according to the frequently used Coie, Dodge, and Coppotelli (CDC) classification method. It was further shown that all stably rejected and all (but one) stably popular CDC girls were members in corresponding clusters. Although no stable clusters of neglected or controversial girls were identified, some temporally volatile clusters were found, which were interpreted as largely accidental groupings. Rejected and popular clusters showed similar associations to some childhood adjustment correlates as the CDC groups and also have been documented by earlier sociometric research. The conclusion was that the clustering technique seems to be a promising classification method in longitudinal sociometric research.
Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169-187.
2.
Arnett, J. J. (2001). Conceptions of the transition to adulthood: Perspectives from adolescence through midlife. Journal of Adult Development, 8, 133-143.
3.
Asher, S. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1986). Identifying children who are rejected by their peers. Developmental Psychology, 22, 444-449.
4.
Asher, S. R., & Hymel, S. (1981). Children's social competence in peer relations: Sociometric and behavioral assessment. In J. D. Wine & M. D. Smye (Eds.), Social competence (pp. 125-157). New York: Guilford.
5.
Bergman, L. R. (1998). A pattern-oriented approach to studying individual development: Snapshots and processes. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 83-121). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Bergman, L. R. (2001). A person approach in research on adolescence: Some methodological challenges. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 28-53.
7.
Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291-319.
8.
Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El-Khouri, B. M. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach: Vol. 4. Paths through life. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Bukowski, W. M., Doyle, A. B., & Markiewicz, D. (2001). Developmental profiles of peer social preference over the course of elementary school: Associations with trajectories of externalizing and internalizing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 37, 308-320.
10.
Bukowski, W. M., & Hoza, B. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcomes. In T. Berndt & G. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp. 15-45). New York: Wiley.
11.
Burks, V. S., Dodge, K. A., & Price, J. M. (1995). Models of internalizing outcomes of early rejection. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 683-695.
12.
Busk, P. L., Ford, R. C., & Schulman, J. L. (1973). Stability of sociometric responses in classrooms. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123, 69-84.
13.
Chen, E., Matthews, K. A., & Boyce, W. T. (2002). Socioeconomic differences in children's health: How and why do these relationships change with age?Psychological Bulletin, 128, 295-329.
14.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (2000). Conceptualizing and measuring peer acceptance and rejection. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system: New directions for child development (Vol. 88, pp. 3-10). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Cillessen, A. H. N., Bukowski, W. M., & Haselager, G. J. T. (2000). Stability of sociometric categories. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system: New directions for child development (Vol. 88, pp. 75-93). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Coie, J. D. (1990). Toward a theory of peer rejection. In S. R. Asher, & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 365-401). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities of children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261-282.
18.
Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1988). Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the school: A cross-age comparison. Child Development, 59, 815-829.
19.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-569.
20.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher, & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17-59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Deater-Deckard, K. (2001). Annotation: Recent research examining the role of peer relationships in the development of psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 565-579.
22.
DeRosier, M. E., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Patterson, C. J. (1994). Children's academic and behavioral adjustment as a function of the chronicity and proximity of peer rejection. Child Development, 65, 1799-1813.
23.
Frederickson, N. L., & Furnham, A. F. (1998). Sociometric classification methods in school peer groups: A comparative investigation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 921-933.
24.
Green, K. D., Forehand, R., Beck, S. J., & Vosk, B. (1980). An assessment of the relationship among measures of children's social competence and children's academic achievement. Child Development, 51, 1149-1156.
25.
Hardy, C. L., Bukowski, W. M., & Sippola, L. K. (2002). Stability and change in peer relationships during the transition to middle-level school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, 117-142.
26.
Haselager, G. J. T., Van Lieshout, C. F. M., Riksen-Walraven, J. M. A., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Hartup, W. W. (2002). Heterogeneity among peer-rejected boys across middle childhood: Developmental pathways of social behavior. Developmental Psychology, 38, 446-456.
27.
Hymel, S., Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., & Renshaw P. D. (2002). Peer acceptance and rejection in childhood. In P. K. Smith, & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 265-284). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
28.
Jiang, X. L., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2005). Stability of continuous measures of sociometric status: A meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 25, 1-25.
29.
Kalfus, G. R., & Berger, E. S. (1985). Test-retest reliability of sociometric questionnaires across four grade levels. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 14, 345-347.
30.
Kistner, J., Balthazor, M., Risi, S., & Burton, C. (1999). Predicting dysphoria in adolescence from actual and perceived peer acceptance in childhood. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28, 94-104.
31.
Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1990). The role of poor peer relationships in the development of disorder. In S. R. Asher, & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 274-305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Ladd, G. W. (1999). Peer relationships and social competence during early and middle childhood. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 333-359.
33.
Ladd, G. W., & Kochenderfer, B. J. (1996). Linkages between friendship and adjustment during early school transitions. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 322-345). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Laursen, B., & Hoff, E. (Eds.). (2006). Person and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data [Special issue]. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3).
35.
Lindfors, P. (2004). Questions on women's situation, life satisfaction and health: The 2004 IDA follow-up survey on women. Technical report (Reports from the project Individual development and Adaptation No. 86). Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Psychology.
36.
Lövdén, M., Bergman, L., Adolfsson, R., Lindenberger, U., & Nilsson, L.-G. (2005). Studying individual aging in an interindividual context: Typical paths of age-related, dementia-related, and mortality-related cognitive development in old age. Psychology and Aging, 20, 303-316.
37.
Maccoby, E. E. (2000). Perspectives on gender development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 398-406.
38.
Magnusson, D. (1988). Individual development from an interactional perspective: A longitudinal study: Vol. 1. Paths through life. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Magnusson, D., & Bergman, L. R. (2000). Individual development and adaptation: The IDA program. In C.-G. Janson (Ed.), Seven Swedish longitudinal studies in the behavioral sciences (pp. 115-139). Stockholm: FRN.
40.
Magnusson, D., Dunér, A., & Zetterblom, G. (1975). Adjustment: A longitudinal study. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. New York: Wiley.
41.
Moreno, J. L. (1947). Progress and pitfalls in sociometric theory. Sociometry, 10, 268-272.
42.
Nagin, D. S. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 139-157.
43.
Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1984). A longitudinal study of the utility of social preference and social impact sociometric classification schemes. Child Development, 55, 1434-1447.
44.
Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.
45.
Parke, R. D., O'Neil, R., Spitzer, S., Isley, S.Welsh, M., Wang, S., et al. (1997). A longitudinal assessment of sociometric stability and the behavioral correlates of children's social acceptance. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 635-662.
46.
Parker, J. G., Rubin, K. H., Price, J. M., & DeRosier, M. E. (1995). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental Psychology: Vol. 2. Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 96-161). New York: Wiley.
47.
Peck, S. C., & Roeser, R. W. (Eds.). (2003). Person-centered approaches to studying development in context [Special issue]. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 101. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 610-700). New York: Wiley.
49.
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. (2000). Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 17-24.
50.
Sandstrom, M. J., & Coie, J. D. (1999). A developmental perspective on peer rejection: Mechanisms of stability and change. Child Development, 70, 955-966.
51.
Silbereisen, R. K. (2002). Commentary: At last research on career development in a developmental contextual fashion. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 310-319.
52.
Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system: New directions for child development (Vol. 88, pp. 27-53). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Terry, R., & Coie, J. D. (1991). A comparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 867-880.
54.
Vitaro, F., Larocque, D., Janosz, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Negative social experiences and dropping out of school. Educational Psychology, 21, 401-415.
55.
Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., Gagnon, C., & Boivin, M. (1992). Peer rejection from kindergarten to Grade 2: Outcomes, correlates, and prediction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 382-400.
56.
Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., Gagnon, C., & Pelletier, D. (1994). Predictive accuracy of behavioral and sociometric assessments of high-risk kindergarten children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 272-282.
57.
Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244.
58.
Wasik, B. H. (1987). Sociometric measures and peer descriptions of kindergarten children: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 16, 218-224.
59.
Woodward, L. J., & Fergusson, D. M. (2000). Childhood peer relationship problems and later risks of educational under-achievement and unemployment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 191-201.
60.
Wu, X., Hart, C. H., Draper, T. W., & Olsen, J. A. (2001). Peer and teacher sociometrics for preschool children: Cross-informant concordance, temporal stability, and reliability. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 416-443.
